# EmailListVerify

> EmailListVerify is a bulk email verification service from Slovak company CyberPanda that sells non-expiring pay-as-you-go credits from $5 per thousand down to $0.00186 each at 100,000, plus monthly subscriptions about 10 percent cheaper, and bundles an unusually large set of adjacent free tools including an inbox placement test, a blacklist checker, DMARC and SPF generators, an email finder, and an MCP server. It runs syntax, MX, SMTP, spam trap, disposable, role, and catch-all detection, claims 97 percent accuracy and processing of more than 100,000 addresses an hour per customer, and gives every new account 100 free verifications.

- Category: Email Verification (https://saastracker.org/categories/email-verification)
- Website: https://www.emaillistverify.com
- Starting price: $5 for 1,000 verifications pay-as-you-go, with 100 free on signup
- Free plan: 100 free verifications on account creation, no credit card. There is no recurring free allowance.
- Free trial: No time-limited trial; 100 free verifications on registration
- Founded: 2003, HQ: Bratislava, Slovakia, Ownership: Privately held, operated by CyberPanda
- Profile last reviewed: 2026-08-22
- Canonical profile: https://saastracker.org/products/emaillistverify

## Overview

EmailListVerify's entire pitch is in its own headline: full-featured email verification, but half the price. It is not the cheapest verifier in the category, and it is not the most technically distinctive, but it occupies a specific and useful position. At $186 for 100,000 pay-as-you-go credits it costs about a third of Kickbox and about half of ZeroBounce, while offering essentially the same checks, an API on every tier, ESP integrations, and non-expiring credits. For a marketing team that wants a competent bulk verifier without a procurement conversation, that is the whole value proposition and it is a coherent one.

The company behind it is CyberPanda, a small Slovak operation in Bratislava that public directories date to 2003 and that runs the service as a lean, self-serve product with almost no sales apparatus. It claims more than five billion addresses checked and reports that about 23 percent of addresses in a typical list come back bad, which is the number it uses to justify the purchase. Accuracy is claimed at 97 percent and deliverability at 99 percent, both vendor-reported without published methodology.

What you notice using it is the sprawl of adjacent free tools. Alongside verification sit an inbox placement test, an IP blacklist checker, a DMARC record generator and checker, an SPF generator, flattening tool, and checker, an MX lookup, an email extractor, an ESP finder, an email health checker, a list growth calculator, and an AI email writer. Most of these are lead magnets rather than products, but several are genuinely useful, and the effect is that a small team gets a rough deliverability toolkit thrown in with the credits rather than needing a second vendor.

The limitation is the one shared by most of the affordable field. EmailListVerify detects catch-all domains and tells you to skip them. It does not attempt to work out which mailboxes exist behind an accept-all server, so on a B2B list heavy with such domains the risky bucket comes back intact and you are back to guessing. It also publishes no policy on whether unknown and catch-all results consume credits, which for a vendor competing on price is a conspicuous omission.

## How it works

1. You register for a free account, which comes with 100 verifications, and upload a list as TXT, CSV, or XLSX. The vendor says results are typically back within a few minutes and that throughput exceeds 100,000 addresses per hour per customer.

2. Each address passes through domain and SMTP validation to remove invalid, inactive, and parked domains and confirm the mailbox exists, an MTA validator that checks whether a mail server is actually responsible for accepting mail for the domain, and a syntax checker.

3. Alongside those, classification layers flag spam traps, disposable and temporary providers, role accounts, and catch-all domains, and a duplicate remover strips repeated addresses so you do not spend credits twice on the same person. The vendor describes its hard bounce checking as sending undetectable verifications to establish whether the mailbox can actually receive mail.

4. For ongoing use, the real-time API drops into registration forms, newsletter signups, and anywhere else you collect an address, and ESP integrations let you clean a list inside the tool you already send from rather than round-tripping a CSV. An MCP server and a Chrome extension extend the same capability into AI assistants and the browser.

## Best for

Small and mid-sized marketing teams cleaning permission-based lists who want a competent, cheap, self-serve verifier with an API, ESP integrations, non-expiring credits, and a bag of free deliverability tools thrown in, and who do not need catch-all resolution or audited certifications.

## Not the right fit for

- B2B outbound teams whose lists are thick with accept-all domains, since EmailListVerify detects those domains and advises skipping them rather than resolving them.
- Buyers who require SOC 2, ISO 27001, or a named security contact in the vendor file; the compliance story here stops at a GDPR statement.
- Anyone verifying more than 250,000 addresses a month on a subscription, because the published subscription ladder stops there and larger volumes require contact rather than a self-serve purchase.
- Teams that need certainty about whether unknown and catch-all results consume credits, which the vendor does not publish, unlike Kickbox, MillionVerifier, Reoon, and Emailable.
- Organisations that want deep integration into a specific marketing platform with scheduled automated cleaning; the integration list here is a set of connectors, not the automation layer Kickbox or Mailfloss provide.

## Features

### Core verification checks

The standard battery, priced well below the market leaders.

- **Domain and SMTP validation**: Removes addresses with invalid, inactive, or parked domains and confirms mailbox existence against the receiving server, which is the layer that does most of the work on a decayed list.
- **MTA validator**: Confirms there is a mail transfer agent actually responsible for accepting mail on the domain, using advanced MX record checks rather than a simple DNS lookup.
- **Syntax error validation**: Catches malformed addresses cheaply before network work begins, and is exposed through the API so you can warn a user in real time on a form.
- **Hard bounce checker**: The vendor describes sending undetectable verifications to establish whether an address genuinely exists and can receive mail, without a visible message arriving for the recipient.
- **Spam trap checker**: Detects addresses planted to identify senders with poor list hygiene, which is the single most consequential thing to remove because hitting one can cost an entire sending reputation.
- **Disposable email cleaner**: Identifies short-lived throwaway addresses used to farm trials and discounts, which are deliverable today and worthless tomorrow.
- **Catch-all domain checker**: Spots domains that return valid for every address. EmailListVerify's stated advice is to skip them to improve open rates, not to resolve which mailboxes actually exist.
- **Duplicate remover**: Strips repeated addresses before verification so a messy export does not cost you credits twice for the same contact.

### Ways to use it

Bulk, API, browser, and agent, on one credit balance.

- **Bulk list verification**: Upload TXT, CSV, or XLSX files, with the vendor claiming throughput above 100,000 addresses per hour per customer and results typically returned within minutes.
- **Real-time verification API**: A REST API included on every plan, including the cheapest, aimed at registration and signup forms so bad addresses never reach the database in the first place.
- **MCP server**: A Model Context Protocol endpoint so AI assistants and agentic pipelines can verify addresses directly rather than through a bespoke integration.
- **Chrome extension**: Browser-side verification for ad hoc checks without opening the web app.
- **Email finder and enrichment APIs**: Separate email search, email finder, domain search, and enrichment APIs sit alongside verification, so a prospecting workflow can source and verify from the same vendor.

### The free tools bundle

An unusually large set of adjacent utilities, several of them genuinely useful.

- **Inbox placement test**: A seed-based placement check showing whether mail lands in inbox, promotions, or spam, which is a capability normally reserved for paid deliverability suites.
- **IP and email blacklist checkers**: Check whether your sending IP or domain has been listed on a blocklist, which is the first diagnostic when open rates collapse without warning.
- **DMARC generator and checker**: Build and validate a DMARC record, which alongside the SPF tools covers the authentication basics that Gmail and Yahoo now enforce on bulk senders.
- **SPF record generator, checker, and flattening tool**: The flattening tool in particular solves a real and annoying problem, the ten-lookup DNS limit that quietly breaks SPF for companies with many sending services.
- **MX lookup and DNS lookup**: Basic mail infrastructure diagnostics available without an account, useful when investigating why a particular domain rejects your mail.
- **Email health checker and list growth calculator**: Lightweight planning and diagnostic tools aimed at marketers rather than administrators.
- **Email extractor and ESP finder**: Pull addresses out of text and identify which email service provider a domain sends through, which is prospecting rather than hygiene but is included anyway.

### Integrations

Direct connections to the tools most small senders actually use.

- **ESP connectors**: Named integrations with Mailchimp, AWeber, MailerLite, Gist, Sendloop, SparkPost, and Mailgun among others, so a list can be verified inside the sending tool.
- **API on every plan**: Unlike vendors that gate programmatic access behind a higher tier, the API is included from the smallest package upward.
- **Verification at point of capture**: The real-time API is explicitly positioned for website registration and newsletter signup forms rather than only for periodic bulk cleaning.
- **Multiple file formats**: TXT, CSV, and XLSX inputs, which covers how small teams actually store lists rather than assuming a clean export.

### Commercial terms

Cheap, non-expiring, and simple, with two published ladders.

- **Non-expiring pay-as-you-go credits**: Pay-as-you-go credits remain valid until used, with no time limit, which removes the pressure that makes annual verifier contracts a bad deal.
- **Two published ladders**: A pay-as-you-go table and a monthly subscription table, both published in full on the pricing page, with subscriptions running roughly 10 percent cheaper per credit at each volume.
- **100 free verifications**: Every new account gets 100 free checks with no card, which is enough to test accuracy against a known control sample.
- **No monthly commitment required**: The pay-as-you-go path has no subscription at all, and subscriptions can be cancelled at any time.
- **Accuracy claim**: The vendor advertises 97 percent accuracy and 99 percent deliverability. Neither figure is backed by published methodology, a third-party audit, or contractual remedy.

## Use cases

- **Small business cleaning a Mailchimp list before a big send**: Two years of accumulated signups, an approaching campaign, and a bounce rate the ESP has started to warn about, with no budget for a $500 clean. Outcome: 10,000 addresses cost $27 pay-as-you-go, the Mailchimp integration handles the round trip, and the free inbox placement test confirms whether the underlying problem was list quality or authentication.
- **Developer adding verification to a signup form**: Fake and mistyped registrations are polluting the database, and the team does not want to pay a premium vendor for what is a simple API call. Outcome: The REST API is included on the cheapest package, syntax and disposable checks run at the point of capture, and non-expiring credits mean a low-traffic product is not paying a monthly subscription for idle capacity.
- **Freelancer or agency handling several small clients**: Each client needs an occasional clean of a few thousand addresses, and buying a monthly subscription per client is absurd. Outcome: One non-expiring pay-as-you-go balance covers all of them, drawn down as needed, with the free DMARC, SPF, and blacklist tools covering the deliverability questions clients inevitably ask.
- **Marketer whose open rates dropped without explanation**: Deliverability collapsed and it is unclear whether the cause is list decay, an authentication failure, or a blocklist entry. Outcome: The free IP blacklist checker, SPF checker, and DMARC checker isolate the authentication and reputation questions, and a verification pass settles the list-quality question, all from one vendor at low cost.

## Pricing

Two published ladders on the same platform: prepaid pay-as-you-go credits that never expire, and monthly subscriptions roughly 10 percent cheaper per credit that renew each month. One credit per address, API included on every plan.

- **Free credits**: $0 100 verifications, one time. Full verification result set; No credit card required; API access included; Does not renew.
- **Pay as you go**: $5 to $186 one-time, by volume, credits never expire. 1,000 for $5, so $0.005 each; 5,000 for $17, so $0.0034 each; 10,000 for $27, so $0.0027 each; 25,000 for $54 and 50,000 for $98; 100,000 for $186, so $0.00186 each. The right choice for project work and agencies, because unused balance never lapses.
- **Monthly subscription**: $16 to $346 per month, by monthly volume. 5,000 per month for $16, so $0.0032 each; 10,000 for $25, so $0.0025 each; 25,000 for $49 and 50,000 for $89; 100,000 for $168, so $0.00168 each; 250,000 for $346, so $0.00138 each. About 10 percent cheaper than pay-as-you-go at matching volumes, and cancellable at any time.
- **Higher volumes**: On request custom. The published subscription ladder stops at 250,000 per month; The published pay-as-you-go ladder stops at 100,000; Larger volumes are quoted rather than purchased self-serve. This is the main practical ceiling on self-serve use.

Billing notes:

- At the reference volumes, pay-as-you-go costs $27 at 10,000 addresses and $186 at 100,000, which is $0.0027 and $0.00186 per address. Subscription pricing is $25 and $168 at the same volumes, or $0.0025 and $0.00168.
- One million is not published on either ladder. At the best published subscription rate of $0.00138 per credit at 250,000 a month, a million addresses would notionally cost about $1,380 if that rate held, but the vendor quotes larger volumes individually and the actual number is likely lower. Treat that figure as an extrapolation, not a published price.
- For comparison at 100,000 addresses, EmailListVerify at $168 to $186 sits between MyEmailVerifier at $89 to $99 and BounceBan at $255 to $300, and well under Kickbox at $500.
- Pay-as-you-go credits never expire, which is the right structure for lumpy agency work. Subscription credits are a monthly allowance and the vendor does not publish a rollover policy.
- The vendor does not publish whether unknown or catch-all results consume a credit, which matters more here than at a premium vendor because the value proposition is price. Assume you pay for the attempt until support tells you otherwise.
- The API is included on every tier including the smallest, which is genuinely unusual and worth weighting in a comparison against vendors that gate it.

Value assessment: EmailListVerify is priced exactly where it should be for what it does. It is not the cheapest, MyEmailVerifier and Reoon both undercut it by roughly half, and it is not the most capable, since it makes no attempt at catch-all resolution and publishes no certifications. What it offers is a well-rounded, competent product at roughly a third of what the establishment vendors charge, with the API included at every tier, non-expiring credits, ESP connectors, and a surprisingly useful pile of free deliverability tools attached. For a small marketing team cleaning a permission-based list, that combination is better value than either the budget floor or the premium ceiling. The unpublished credit policy on unknowns is the one thing that undermines a price-led pitch, and it is worth an email to support before you buy a large package.

## Strengths

- Roughly a third the price of Kickbox and half the price of ZeroBounce for substantially the same core checks, with two fully published price ladders and no sales gate.
- The API is included on every plan including the smallest package, rather than gated behind an upgrade.
- Pay-as-you-go credits never expire, which suits agencies and project work far better than a subscription with a monthly allowance.
- An unusually broad set of free adjacent tools including inbox placement testing, blacklist checking, DMARC and SPF generation and validation, and an SPF flattening tool that solves a real DNS problem.
- Direct ESP integrations with Mailchimp, AWeber, MailerLite, Gist, Sendloop, SparkPost, and Mailgun, plus an MCP server and a Chrome extension.
- Claimed throughput above 100,000 addresses per hour per customer, with results typically returned within minutes, which is fast for the price band.
- Duplicate removal happens before verification so you do not spend credits on the same address twice.

## Limitations

- No catch-all resolution at all. The vendor detects accept-all domains and explicitly recommends skipping them, which leaves the risky bucket exactly where it was.
- No published policy on whether unknown or catch-all results consume credits, which is a meaningful gap for a vendor competing on price.
- Compliance stops at a GDPR statement. No SOC 2, no ISO 27001, no published data residency, retention window, or security contact.
- The published ladders stop at 100,000 pay-as-you-go and 250,000 per month on subscription, so genuinely high volume is not self-serve.
- Accuracy of 97 percent and deliverability of 99 percent are vendor claims with no methodology, audit, or contractual remedy behind them.
- The company publishes very little about itself: no team page, no named leadership on the site, and no funding or ownership disclosure.
- The proliferation of free tools, roughly twenty of them, reads as a search-traffic strategy as much as a product strategy, and several are thin.

## Comparisons

- **EmailListVerify vs Kickbox**: Kickbox costs $500 for 100,000 addresses where EmailListVerify costs $168 to $186 for essentially the same checks. Kickbox adds a Ziff Davis parent, a SOC 2 posture, EU processing, roughly thirty native ESP connectors, scheduled automated cleaning, and a published refund on unknown results. Neither resolves catch-alls. If you need a vendor your security team will sign off on, pay the multiple; if you just need the list cleaned, EmailListVerify does the job for a third of the money.
- **EmailListVerify vs MyEmailVerifier**: MyEmailVerifier is roughly half the price again, at $99 pay-as-you-go for 100,000 against $186, and it offers 100 free credits every day rather than 100 once, plus a Deep Catch-All Check that EmailListVerify does not attempt. EmailListVerify counters with the wider free tool set, more named ESP integrations, and an inbox placement test. On price and catch-all capability MyEmailVerifier wins; on breadth around the verifier EmailListVerify does.
- **EmailListVerify vs ListWise**: ListWise charges $185 for a prepaid 100,000-address clean, almost identical to EmailListVerify's $186, and adds auto typo fixing, anti-greylisting technology, and explicit spam-trap and no-reply detection from a New Zealand company operating since the 2010s. EmailListVerify has a far broader tool set, an API on every tier, and more integrations. ListWise is the more focused cleaner; EmailListVerify is the better all-rounder at the same price.
- **EmailListVerify vs MailboxValidator**: MailboxValidator is a similar small, long-lived, developer-friendly vendor, and its bulk table is cheaper at high volume, $199.95 for 100,000 and $699.95 for a million. But its bulk credits expire after 30 days and it cannot validate Yahoo addresses at all, which is a serious functional gap on consumer lists. EmailListVerify's non-expiring credits and complete provider coverage make it the safer default; MailboxValidator wins on the published million-address price.
- **EmailListVerify vs MillionVerifier**: MillionVerifier is the closest budget competitor and undercuts EmailListVerify on price while explicitly not charging for risky results and claiming to resolve a portion of catch-alls at no extra cost. EmailListVerify answers with the free deliverability toolkit, more ESP connectors, and an inbox placement test. If price per credit and the unknown-charging policy are what you care about, MillionVerifier is the better buy; if you want the surrounding tools, EmailListVerify is.

## Implementation

- Setup time: Minutes. Register, use the 100 free credits on a sample, buy a package, upload a file. An ESP integration is a short OAuth flow. The API takes an hour or two to wire into a signup form and is available on the smallest plan.
- Learning curve: Very low. The result vocabulary is standard, the interface is plain, and there are no configurable quality levels or credit multipliers to reason about. The only judgement call is what to do with the catch-all segment, and the vendor's advice, skip it, is at least unambiguous.
- Onboarding: Fully self-serve on both ladders. There is a request-a-demo path for larger buyers but nothing about the published tiers requires it.
- Migration: Verification is stateless so there is nothing to move. Because credits never expire on the pay-as-you-go path, the cheapest sensible test is to buy the $5 thousand-credit package and run a sample your incumbent has already scored, then compare the risky and unknown buckets directly. If you are coming from a vendor that resolved catch-alls, expect the mailable list to shrink here, because EmailListVerify will hand those addresses back untouched.

## Platform, API & security

- Platforms: Web application, REST API, MCP server, Chrome extension, ESP integrations
- API: REST API for real-time and bulk verification, included on every plan including the smallest package, alongside separate email search, email finder, domain search, and enrichment APIs. The vendor claims throughput above 100,000 addresses per hour per customer with results typically in minutes. No public rate limits or latency SLA are published.
- Compliance: GDPR (vendor statement)
- Data residency: Not published. The operating company is based in Bratislava, Slovakia.
- SSO: Not advertised.
- Security notes: The vendor states GDPR compliance and describes its hard bounce checking as using undetectable verifications, meaning no visible message reaches the recipient. There is no published SOC 2 report, ISO certification, data retention window, penetration test summary, or trust centre, which is the standard gap across the affordable end of this category.

## Support

- Channels: Email support, Contact form, Demo request for larger buyers
- Documentation: Public API documentation, integration guides, an FAQ covering verification concepts, and an extensive blog aimed at deliverability topics.
- Community: No user forum or community programme.

## Company

- Founded: 2003
- Headquarters: Bratislava, Slovakia
- Ownership: Privately held, operated by CyberPanda
- Employees: Not disclosed; small team
- Funding: No funding disclosed.

Timeline:

- 2003: The operating company behind EmailListVerify is founded in Bratislava, Slovakia, according to public company directories, later trading as CyberPanda.
- 2016: EmailListVerify establishes itself as a low-cost bulk verifier with published pay-as-you-go and subscription ladders, an API on every tier, and direct ESP integrations.
- 2021: Expands sideways into free deliverability utilities including blacklist checking, DMARC and SPF tooling, MX lookup, and an inbox placement test.
- 2024: Adds email finder, domain search, and enrichment APIs, positioning the service for prospecting workflows rather than list hygiene alone.
- 2026: Ships an MCP server and a Chrome extension, and cites more than five billion addresses checked with about 23 percent of a typical list found to be bad.

## Integrations

Mailchimp, AWeber, MailerLite, Gist, Sendloop, SparkPost, Mailgun, REST verification API, Email finder, domain search, and enrichment APIs, MCP server, Chrome extension

## FAQ

### What is EmailListVerify?

EmailListVerify is a bulk email verification service operated by the Slovak company CyberPanda. It runs syntax, domain, MX, and SMTP checks alongside spam trap, disposable, role account, and catch-all detection, and sells the result as non-expiring pay-as-you-go credits or as a monthly subscription. It includes an API on every tier and bundles a large set of free deliverability tools such as an inbox placement test, blacklist checkers, and DMARC and SPF utilities.

### How much does EmailListVerify cost?

Pay-as-you-go runs $5 for 1,000, $17 for 5,000, $27 for 10,000, $54 for 25,000, $98 for 50,000, and $186 for 100,000, with credits that never expire. Monthly subscriptions are about 10 percent cheaper at matching volumes: $16 for 5,000 a month, $25 for 10,000, $49 for 25,000, $89 for 50,000, $168 for 100,000, and $346 for 250,000. Every new account gets 100 free verifications.

### How does EmailListVerify handle catch-all and accept-all addresses?

It detects them and recommends skipping them. The catch-all domain checker spots servers that return valid for every address, and the vendor's published advice is that excluding them improves open rates. There is no attempt to resolve which mailboxes actually exist behind an accept-all server, so if your list is B2B and that bucket is large, you will need a specialist such as Truelist, Scrubby, or BounceBan alongside or instead.

### Do EmailListVerify credits expire?

Pay-as-you-go credits do not expire and remain available until you use them, which is the main reason to prefer that ladder for project or agency work. Subscription plans grant a monthly allowance and the vendor does not publish a rollover policy, so treat subscription credits as use-it-or-lose-it unless support confirms otherwise.

### Does EmailListVerify charge for unknown or catch-all results?

The vendor does not publish an answer, which is a notable omission for a service competing on price. Kickbox refunds credits on risky and unknown results, and MillionVerifier, Reoon, Bouncer, and Emailable all publish some version of not charging for non-answers. Ask support before buying a large package, because on a list with a high accept-all share the difference is material.

### What accuracy or bounce-rate guarantee does EmailListVerify offer?

The site advertises 97 percent accuracy and 99 percent deliverability, based on its own data across more than five billion addresses checked. No methodology, third-party audit, or contractual remedy is published, so these should be read as marketing claims rather than as service levels. The 100 free verifications are the practical way to test them on addresses whose status you already know.

### Does EmailListVerify detect role accounts, disposable addresses, and spam traps?

Yes to all three. Role accounts, disposable and temporary providers, and spam traps are each explicitly detected, alongside catch-all servers, free providers, and duplicates. The spam trap check is the most valuable of these, because a single trap hit can damage a sending reputation far more than a hundred ordinary bounces.

### What free tools does EmailListVerify include?

An unusually long list: an inbox placement test, an IP blacklist checker and an email blacklist checker, a DMARC record generator and checker, an SPF record generator, checker, and flattening tool, an MX lookup, a DNS lookup, an email extractor, an ESP finder, an email health checker, a list growth calculator, a disposable checker, an email tester, and an AI email writer. Several are lead magnets, but the placement test, the blacklist checkers, and the SPF flattening tool are genuinely useful.

### Is EmailListVerify GDPR compliant and where is my data held?

The vendor states GDPR compliance and the operating company is based in Bratislava, Slovakia, so the counterparty is inside the EU. Beyond that statement there is no published data residency commitment, retention window, SOC 2 report, ISO certification, or trust centre. Buyers with a formal vendor security process should expect to ask questions the website does not answer.

### Who should not use EmailListVerify?

B2B outbound teams whose value sits in the accept-all bucket, since it will not be resolved here. Buyers who need audited certifications. Anyone verifying well above 250,000 addresses a month, where the published ladders run out. And price-sensitive high-volume buyers, who will do better with MyEmailVerifier, Reoon, or MillionVerifier at roughly half the rate.

## Editorial verdict

EmailListVerify is the competent middle of this category, and there is more merit in that than the description suggests. It runs every check a permission-based marketing list needs, includes the API on the cheapest plan, sells non-expiring credits, connects to the ESPs small senders actually use, and costs about a third of what the establishment vendors charge for the same work. The free tools around it, particularly the inbox placement test, the blacklist checkers, and the SPF flattening utility, give a small team a rough deliverability toolkit they would otherwise buy separately. Two things keep it from being a default recommendation. It will not touch a catch-all domain, so B2B outbound teams should look elsewhere, and it does not publish whether unresolved results cost you a credit, which is a strange gap for a vendor whose entire pitch is price. Buy the $5 thousand-credit package, run a list you already know the answers to, and ask support the credit question. If both check out, this is a sensible, unglamorous purchase.

---

Source: SaaSTracker (https://saastracker.org), an independent editorial project. This profile is compiled from public information, carries no peer reviews or paid placement, and was last reviewed 2026-08-22. Awards are judged on published criteria: https://saastracker.org/methodology