Aomni logoRegie.ai logo

Aomni vs Regie.ai

An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.

The short answer

Both sides assessed

Aomni compared with Regie.ai

Regie is a full prospecting workspace at $49 a month with sourcing, sequencing, a dialer, and signals, aimed at pipeline volume. Aomni does none of that and instead goes deep on the accounts you have already chosen. A team running hundreds of prospects a month wants Regie; a team running twenty strategic accounts wants Aomni, and some teams reasonably run both.

Regie.ai compared with Aomni

Aomni goes far deeper on a single account, aggregating a thousand data points and producing account plans for enterprise sellers at $300 a month. Regie goes wider and cheaper, ranking many accounts and running the outreach itself at $49. Pick Aomni for a handful of large strategic deals; pick Regie for a pipeline of small ones.

Choose Aomni if

Founders and sellers working a small list of high-value named accounts, where a two-hour research pass per company is the actual bottleneck and each deal is worth more than the entire annual subscription.

Choose Regie.ai if

Small sales teams and founders who already have deliverable mailboxes and want the research, ranking, drafting, and sequencing work handled cheaply, and who will edit the output rather than expecting to let it run unattended.

Side by side

13 attributes
AttributeAomniRegie.ai
CategoryAI SDRAI SDR
Starting price$0 (Starter), then $300 per month (Pro) (free plan available)$0 (Free), then $49 per month (Pro) (free plan available)
Pricing modelFreemium with a flat Pro subscription covering three members plus per-seat expansion. Enterprise is quoted after a demo.Freemium credit-metered subscription. Free and Pro are self-serve; Enterprise is quoted per team after a demo.
Free planBasic AI research, AI strategy, AI chat, and customizable deliverables at no cost with no credit card required.250 one-time credits with full workspace access: research, enrichment, drafting, dialer, and agents, sending from your own Gmail or Outlook, single user.
Free trialThe free Starter tier is the trial; the vendor describes it as zero commitment with self-serve signupThe free plan is the trial; no credit card is required and no expiry is imposed.
Best forFounders and sellers working a small list of high-value named accounts, where a two-hour research pass per company is the actual bottleneck and each deal is worth more than the entire annual subscription.Small sales teams and founders who already have deliverable mailboxes and want the research, ranking, drafting, and sequencing work handled cheaply, and who will edit the output rather than expecting to let it run unattended.
Setup timeMinutes on the free tier: point it at an account and read what comes back. Pro adds mailbox and LinkedIn connections, which take an afternoon. There is no warmup phase because there is no cold-sending infrastructure.Under an hour on the free tier. Connect Gmail or Outlook, describe the ICP, and the workspace starts sourcing. Because there is no vendor-provisioned domain, there is no warmup wait, which is the fastest time to first send in this category.
Learning curveLow to start, moderate to get full value. The default research output is immediately useful; building custom research workflows that encode your qualification criteria is where the product becomes genuinely differentiated, and that takes deliberate effort.Moderate. The workspace has a lot of surface: agents, signals, sequences, dialer, content. The skill that matters is knowing how much of the AI draft to rewrite, which reviewers suggest is most of it early on.
PlatformsWeb application, Gmail and Outlook connections, LinkedIn, Calendar integrationsWeb application, Gmail and Outlook sending, Built-in dialer, LinkedIn touches, Chrome workflows
ComplianceNot publicly detailed on the marketing site; enterprise customers are served through the Enterprise tierSOC 2 referenced as part of the Enterprise security package, GDPR handling described in vendor materials
Founded20232022
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesSan Francisco, California, United States
OwnershipVenture-backedVenture-backed

Strengths and limitations

Aomni

Strengths

  • The best research layer in this batch: waterfall enrichment across twenty-plus sources with its own deep-research pass rather than a single database lookup.
  • Output is strategy rather than data, with account plans, stakeholder maps, and value propositions a seller can actually use in a conversation.
  • A free tier with real capability makes it the cheapest way in the category to test whether AI research meets your standard.
  • Pro at $300 covers three people flat, which beats per-seat pricing for a small AE team and includes unlimited research.

Limitations

  • No sending infrastructure, no warmup, and no deliverability tooling, so this cannot be your outbound engine.
  • CRM integration sits on the demo-gated Enterprise tier, which is a significant gap for a $300 a month product.
  • Bulk research is Enterprise-only, so the self-serve plans are account-by-account by design.
  • The vendor's claims of saving three hours per prospect and improving close rates by forty percent are marketing figures with no published methodology.

Regie.ai

Strengths

  • The only serious AI SDR platform with a genuinely free tier and a published $49 self-serve plan, which removes the category's usual $2,500 evaluation tax.
  • A dialer, LinkedIn steps, and email sequencing in one workspace, with calling available even on the free plan.
  • Why-now signal tracking and account ranking give the outreach a defensible reason to exist rather than a firmographic filter.
  • Failed enrichment does not consume credits on paid plans, which is a fairer meter than the industry norm.

Limitations

  • The persistent review complaint is that AI copy reads robotically and reps rewrite most of it, which undercuts the autonomy story.
  • Data accuracy friction shows up in reviews as wrong phone numbers and prospect mismatches, so verification remains a manual habit.
  • Auto-Pilot targeting runs on ICP filters and basic intent signals, not deep triggers like competitor contract timing or technology evaluations.
  • No sending infrastructure: if your domain is unwarmed or your mailbox is not configured for cold outreach, Regie will happily help you burn it.

Pricing compared

Aomni

Freemium with a flat Pro subscription covering three members plus per-seat expansion. Enterprise is quoted after a demo.

  • Starter$0
  • Pro$300
  • EnterpriseCustom

Aomni is priced per unit of thinking, not per unit of volume, and that is the correct way to judge it. At $300 a month for three people, it costs less than a day of an AE's fully loaded time and replaces the two-hour research pass that would otherwise precede every serious account. For a team selling deals worth five figures or more, that is trivially good value. For a team selling $200 a month subscriptions to thousands of small businesses, it is an expensive way to write emails, because there is no sending engine and no volume mechanism to amortize the cost. The dividing line is deal size, and it is unusually sharp.

Regie.ai

Freemium credit-metered subscription. Free and Pro are self-serve; Enterprise is quoted per team after a demo.

  • Free$0
  • Pro$49
  • EnterpriseCustom

At $49 a month for 5,000 credits, Regie is the cheapest way to find out whether AI-assisted prospecting helps your business, and the free tier means the first answer costs nothing. Judged against AiSDR at $250 to $2,500 a month or Artisan's demo-only contracts, the capability per dollar is extraordinary, with the dialer included even on free. The honest caveats are that credits are consumed quickly by enrichment, that unused credits vanish at reset, and that the price excludes the sending infrastructure competitors bundle. Read Pro as an excellent research, drafting, and orchestration workspace for a team that already has deliverable mailboxes, and price the mailboxes separately.

Editorial verdict on each

Aomni

Aomni is the most intellectually honest product in this category because it refuses the part everyone else oversells. There is no autonomous digital rep here, no sending engine, and no meeting-booking claim. There is a research agent that does two hours of account preparation in a few minutes, across a waterfall of twenty-plus sources, and turns it into an account plan a seller can use in a real conversation. For a founder or a small AE team working named accounts worth five figures and up, $300 a month for three seats is close to a rounding error against the time it returns, and the free tier makes the decision empirical rather than theoretical. Two things to check before buying: CRM sync is an Enterprise feature, so at Pro the research may live outside the system your team works in, and the economics collapse if your deals are small. Ignore the forty percent close-rate claim entirely and judge it on three accounts you already know well.

Read the full Aomni profile

Regie.ai

Best Value

Regie.ai is the most buyable product in a category that mostly refuses to publish prices. The free tier is a real evaluation, the $49 Pro plan is priced below single-purpose data tools, and the workspace covers sourcing, signals, enrichment, drafting, sequencing, and dialing without a contract or a seat minimum. What you should not buy is the autonomy story: Auto-Pilot runs on ICP filters and ordinary intent signals, the copy reads like AI copy until a human rewrites it, and the data occasionally sends you to the wrong person. Also remember what the $49 excludes, which is the entire sending infrastructure problem, since Regie ships mail through your own Gmail or Outlook. For a founder or a two-rep team with a healthy mailbox and someone willing to edit, this is the correct first purchase in the AI SDR category, and the free tier means finding out costs nothing.

Read the full Regie.ai profile

Aomni profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; Regie.ai last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.