Circleback vs jamie
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
Still shortlisting? Browse the best in AI Meeting Note Takers for every option we track, with award winners called out.
The short answer
Editorial assessmentjamie compared with Circleback
Circleback is the closest competitor on philosophy: bot-optional, note-quality focused, 100-plus languages, and a deep automation layer with API, webhooks, and MCP at $15 to $25 a seat billed annually. jamie counters with EU hosting, ISO 27001, in-person capture, and unlimited storage on free. If automation depth is the priority, Circleback; if European data governance is, jamie.
Choose Circleback if
Teams of 2 to 50 who care more about note quality and post-meeting automation than about paying nothing, especially multilingual teams and anyone in healthcare or another regulated field who needs HIPAA without buying an enterprise tier.
Choose jamie if
European companies with real GDPR obligations and a requirement for EU data residency, multilingual teams working across many languages, and anyone who needs bot-free capture for both online and in-person meetings.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Circleback | jamie |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Meeting Notes | Meeting Notes |
| Starting price | $0 (Free), then $15 per user per month billed annually (Pro; $18 monthly) | €0 (Free), then €21 per month billed annually (Plus) |
| Pricing model | Freemium per-seat subscription: a free plan with 30 days of history, Pro and Business billed monthly or annually, and a published annual-only Enterprise tier with volume bands. | Freemium subscription in euros, metered by meetings per month and by maximum meeting duration on individual tiers, with per-seat pricing on team plans. |
| Free plan | Free forever: unlimited meetings and members, 30 days of meeting and recording history, limited automations, API, MCP, and CLI access, and 2 teams. | 10 meetings per month with a 30-minute cap per meeting, notes and transcripts in 99-plus languages, unlimited storage, Ask jamie, and Notion, Google Docs, and OneNote integrations. |
| Free trial | Paid plans can be trialled from the pricing page; the trial length is not published | No fixed-length trial is published; the free tier is the evaluation path |
| Best for | Teams of 2 to 50 who care more about note quality and post-meeting automation than about paying nothing, especially multilingual teams and anyone in healthcare or another regulated field who needs HIPAA without buying an enterprise tier. | European companies with real GDPR obligations and a requirement for EU data residency, multilingual teams working across many languages, and anyone who needs bot-free capture for both online and in-person meetings. |
| Setup time | Ten minutes to first notes: connect a calendar, install the desktop app if you want bot-free capture, and take a meeting. Building the automation rules that justify the price is a further afternoon. | Around ten minutes. Install jamie, connect a calendar, grant microphone and system audio permission, and the next meeting is captured. There is no bot to whitelist and no meeting-platform admin approval to obtain. |
| Learning curve | Low for capture and notes. The automation layer rewards someone who thinks in terms of triggers and fields, and the CLI and API assume a technical user, though nothing requires them. | Low. The two things worth configuring early are speaker identities, so speaker memory starts building correctly, and the note language, since jamie will happily produce notes in a different language from the one the meeting was held in. |
| Platforms | Web app, Desktop app for macOS and Windows, Mobile apps, Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Webex, Discord, RingCentral, and Slack huddles, In-person recording | Desktop application, Any online meeting platform via device audio, In-person and hybrid meetings, MCP endpoint on Pro and above |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA (positioned within the Enterprise tier) | ISO 27001 certified, GDPR compliant, DORA compliant, Data processing agreements available on Enterprise |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Rösrath (near Cologne), Germany |
| Ownership | Venture-backed (Y Combinator) | Privately held, venture and angel backed |
Strengths and limitations
Circleback
Strengths
- Note quality is the best-regarded in the category, polished enough to send to a client without editing, which is what most of the 500-plus testimonials on the site are actually about.
- Action items are assigned and organized rather than merely listed, which is the prerequisite that makes the automation layer worth anything.
- More than 1,000 integrations plus an API, webhooks, a CLI, and an MCP endpoint gives it more programmatic surface than any comparably sized vendor here.
- Bot-free desktop capture works across Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, Webex, Discord, and RingCentral, and bot-based joining is still available when you need to send it somewhere you are not.
Limitations
- The free plan's 30-day history window is short for a tool whose value compounds with archive size, and the trial length for paid plans is not published.
- The company is roughly ten people with $2.5M raised, which makes vendor risk a legitimate concern for anyone standardizing a whole organization on it.
- No sales coaching layer: no call scoring, no playbook adherence, no rep analytics, so revenue teams will need a second tool.
- HIPAA is positioned within Enterprise rather than the self-serve tiers, so the regulated-industry pitch requires a sales conversation after all.
jamie
Strengths
- Complete EU hosting for both storage and processing, which resolves the data transfer question that blocks most American tools in European procurement.
- ISO 27001 certification plus a clear, unambiguous statement that customer data is never used to train models.
- More than 99 languages for both transcripts and notes, the broadest coverage among the bot-free tools in this category.
- Device-level capture handles in-person and hybrid meetings as well as online calls, which browser-extension rivals cannot do at all.
Limitations
- Expensive: Pro at €39 a month is roughly triple Granola Business for a comparable individual, and the euro pricing adds currency risk for non-eurozone buyers.
- Hard meeting-duration caps at 30 minutes, 2 hours, and 5 hours by tier, which is an unusual constraint and a genuine problem for workshops and all-day sessions.
- The cheap tiers are not viable plans: 10 meetings at 30 minutes on Free and 20 meetings on Plus rule out anyone with a normal calendar.
- No audio or video retention means no playback for coaching, demo review, or checking how something was said.
Pricing compared
Circleback
Freemium per-seat subscription: a free plan with 30 days of history, Pro and Business billed monthly or annually, and a published annual-only Enterprise tier with volume bands.
- Free$0
- Pro$15
- Business$25
- Enterprise$35
Circleback is priced like a premium tool and mostly earns it, and the 2026 repackaging made it easier to try. The free plan has no meeting cap and keeps 30 days of history; at $15 a seat billed annually ($18 monthly) Pro adds 100-plus languages, bot-free capture, unlimited history, and a full automation layer with API, webhooks, CLI, and MCP, which Fireflies charges $19 a seat for and Fathom gates behind a $25 Business tier. Where it loses is the free floor: Fathom gives away unlimited recording, so a cost-driven founder who never needs history beyond a month has cheaper options. Buy Circleback when note quality and post-meeting automation are the point.
jamie
Freemium subscription in euros, metered by meetings per month and by maximum meeting duration on individual tiers, with per-seat pricing on team plans.
- Free€0
- Plus€21
- Pro€39
- Team€33
- EnterpriseCustom
jamie is priced as a compliance product, and if you have the compliance requirement it is worth it. If you do not, it is hard to defend. Model 20 meetings a week: roughly 80 a month, which immediately eliminates Free and Plus and puts you on Pro at €39 a month, about €468 a year, or Team at €33 a seat. Granola Business gives an equivalent user unlimited notes, unlimited history, CRM connectors, API, and MCP for $14. Tactiq Team gives unlimited AI generation for $16.67. On raw capability per euro jamie is roughly two to three times the market. What the premium buys is complete EU hosting, ISO 27001, 99-plus languages, in-person capture, and a vendor that answers to European regulators. For a Berlin or Munich buyer with a data protection officer to satisfy, that is a rational purchase. For a US startup that has never been asked where its data lives, it is an expensive way to get notes.
Editorial verdict on each
Circleback
MomentumCircleback is the connoisseur's pick in this category: the notes read better than anything else here, the action items are assigned rather than listed, and the automation surface, with 1,000-plus integrations plus API, webhooks, a CLI, and MCP, is deeper than companies twenty times its size ship. The two honest objections are the absence of a free plan, which puts it out of reach for a founder with no budget when Fathom and Granola exist, and the fact that ten people and $2.5M is a thin foundation for an organization-wide standard. Buy it if meetings generate real downstream admin you want automated away, if you work across languages, or if you need notes polished enough to forward to a client. If you just want decent notes for free, this is not the tool to argue yourself into.
Read the full Circleback profilejamie
jamie is what you buy when the answer to where does the data live has to be Europe. Complete EU hosting, ISO 27001, no model training on your conversations, audio deleted after transcription, and 99-plus languages add up to a product that clears European procurement in a way that most of this category cannot, and the bot-free local capture means it clears the client-relationship test too. The cost of that position is real: Pro at €39 a month is around triple Granola Business for a comparable individual, the meeting-duration caps are an odd and genuinely limiting constraint, and the cheap tiers are demonstrations rather than plans. If you have a data protection officer to satisfy or a genuinely multilingual European operation, jamie is the right choice and the premium is defensible. If you do not, you are paying two to three times the market rate for a compliance property nobody will ever ask you about.
Read the full jamie profileCircleback profile last reviewed 2026-09-27; jamie last reviewed 2026-09-27. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.
The best in AI Meeting Note Takers
23 trackedAI meeting note takers join calls to record, transcribe, and summarize them, turning conversations into searchable notes, action items, and CRM updates without anyone typing.
The broadest platform in meeting AI: transcription, search, AI apps, and integrations that reach every corner of the small-business stack.
A free plan with unlimited recording and transcription that forced every paid notetaker in the category to justify its price.
A ten-person team out-writing the funded competition on note quality, then automating what the notes say.
Abandoned the meeting bot entirely for a local notepad that finishes what you type, a mechanism the rest of the category is now copying.
A five minute Chrome extension install with no bot to whitelist, and notes open automatically in a post-call tab the moment you hang up.
Frequently asked questions
6 questionsWhat is the difference between Circleback and jamie?
Circleback is the closest competitor on philosophy: bot-optional, note-quality focused, 100-plus languages, and a deep automation layer with API, webhooks, and MCP at $15 to $25 a seat billed annually. jamie counters with EU hosting, ISO 27001, in-person capture, and unlimited storage on free. If automation depth is the priority, Circleback; if European data governance is, jamie.
Is Circleback or jamie cheaper?
Circleback starts at $0 (Free), then $15 per user per month billed annually (Pro; $18 monthly). jamie starts at €0 (Free), then €21 per month billed annually (Plus). The billing models differ, so the entry price is rarely the whole cost. Circleback pricing model: Freemium per-seat subscription: a free plan with 30 days of history, Pro and Business billed monthly or annually, and a published annual-only Enterprise tier with volume bands. jamie pricing model: Freemium subscription in euros, metered by meetings per month and by maximum meeting duration on individual tiers, with per-seat pricing on team plans.
Does Circleback or jamie have a free plan?
Circleback has a free plan. Free forever: unlimited meetings and members, 30 days of meeting and recording history, limited automations, API, MCP, and CLI access, and 2 teams. Trial terms: Paid plans can be trialled from the pricing page; the trial length is not published. jamie has a free plan. 10 meetings per month with a 30-minute cap per meeting, notes and transcripts in 99-plus languages, unlimited storage, Ask jamie, and Notion, Google Docs, and OneNote integrations. Trial terms: No fixed-length trial is published; the free tier is the evaluation path.
Who should choose Circleback?
Teams of 2 to 50 who care more about note quality and post-meeting automation than about paying nothing, especially multilingual teams and anyone in healthcare or another regulated field who needs HIPAA without buying an enterprise tier.
Who should choose jamie?
European companies with real GDPR obligations and a requirement for EU data residency, multilingual teams working across many languages, and anyone who needs bot-free capture for both online and in-person meetings.
What are the best alternatives to Circleback and jamie?
SaaSTracker profiles 23 products in AI Meeting Note Takers. The Summer 2026 awards in the category went to Fireflies.ai (Category Leader), Fathom (Best Value), Granola (Innovation). Every profile is compiled from primary sources, so a shortlist can be built from pricing, limitations, and fit rather than from star ratings.
