GetProspect vs Voila Norbert
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Both sides assessedGetProspect compared with Voila Norbert
Voila Norbert sells the same core deliverable at a higher price, 49 dollars for 1,000 leads against GetProspect's 34 on annual billing, but includes unlimited team members, credit rollover, and separately priced pay-as-you-go verification at 0.003 dollars an email and enrichment from 0.015. GetProspect bundles verification into the find and includes a CRM. Norbert suits a team that wants cheap standalone verification at volume; GetProspect suits one that wants a single subscription covering the whole find-and-organise loop.
Voila Norbert compared with GetProspect
GetProspect is cheaper per verified address, 34 dollars for 1,000 on annual billing against Norbert's 39, and adds a searchable database, a built-in CRM, and a Google Sheets add-on with every feature on every tier. Norbert answers with unlimited seats where GetProspect does not publish a seat policy, and with pay-as-you-go verification at 0.003 dollars that GetProspect does not offer standalone. For a solo user GetProspect is the fuller product; for a team that also needs bulk verification, Norbert.
Choose GetProspect if
Small businesses and solo operators who want a complete email-finding toolkit rather than a feature-gated starter plan, who expect their volume to grow through the middle of a price ladder, and who need work email addresses rather than phone numbers.
Choose Voila Norbert if
Small teams and agencies who want a stable, long-established email finder with unlimited seats on a shared credit pool, and anyone who needs cheap standalone list verification or enrichment without committing to a subscription.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | GetProspect | Voila Norbert |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Data | Data |
| Starting price | $0 (Free, 50 valid emails), then $34 per month on annual billing (Starter, $49 month-to-month) (free plan available) | $0 (50 free finds on signup), then $39 per month on annual billing (Valet, $49 month-to-month) (free plan available) |
| Pricing model | Freemium subscription priced by the number of valid verified email addresses per month, with full feature access on every tier and roughly 30 percent off for annual billing. | Subscription prospecting plans priced by monthly lead allowance with unlimited team members, plus separately priced pay-as-you-go verification and enrichment utilities, plus a distinct per-seat email sequencing product. |
| Free plan | 50 valid email addresses per month with complete access to the database, the LinkedIn extension, the CRM, the bulk finder, the Google Sheets add-on, integrations, and the API. | No permanent free prospecting plan; the 50 signup credits serve as the trial. The separate Email Sequences product does have a free tier of 2,500 emails a month. |
| Free trial | No time-limited trial; the permanent free tier carries the full feature set | 50 complimentary finder credits on account creation, with no time limit stated |
| Best for | Small businesses and solo operators who want a complete email-finding toolkit rather than a feature-gated starter plan, who expect their volume to grow through the middle of a price ladder, and who need work email addresses rather than phone numbers. | Small teams and agencies who want a stable, long-established email finder with unlimited seats on a shared credit pool, and anyone who needs cheap standalone list verification or enrichment without committing to a subscription. |
| Setup time | Under ten minutes. Sign up, run a database search or install the extension, and results are immediate. CRM connection adds fifteen minutes of field mapping. | Ten minutes. Create an account, take the 50 free credits, and run a lookup or upload a CSV. Connecting a CRM adds fifteen minutes; an API integration is a few hours given the four client libraries. |
| Learning curve | Low. Because there is no feature gating, there is also no confusion about what your plan includes: you have everything, and the only variable is how many valid addresses you can pull this month. | Minimal. Norbert does one thing and the interface reflects that. The only thing worth learning is the certainty score, since treating a low-confidence result as verified is how people generate bounces and then blame the tool. |
| Platforms | Web application, Chrome extension, Google Sheets add-on, REST API | Web application, Chrome extension, REST API, Bulk CSV processing |
| Compliance | GDPR referenced in the vendor's policies, CCPA referenced in the vendor's policies | GDPR referenced in the vendor's policies, CCPA referenced in the vendor's policies |
| Founded | 2016 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Kyiv, Ukraine | United States, operated by Ramp Ventures (Austin, Texas) |
| Ownership | Privately held and independent | Owned by Ramp Ventures, the group run by Sujan Patel that also owns Mailshake |
Strengths and limitations
GetProspect
Strengths
- Every feature, including the API, the extension, the CRM, and the integrations, is available on every plan including free, so the free tier is a genuine evaluation rather than a stripped demo.
- Credits are consumed only for valid, verified addresses, making the advertised price close to a true cost per usable contact.
- A properly graded price ladder at 1,000, 5,000, 20,000, and 50,000 valid emails a month, with no cliff for a growing team.
- Both a searchable database and a LinkedIn extension, so losing LinkedIn access does not take the product with it.
Limitations
- No meaningful phone data: five credits a month on two tiers is a rounding error, and no plan makes GetProspect a calling tool.
- No buying signals, intent data, technographics, or org charts, so account research has to happen somewhere else.
- No published API rate limits, which makes building against it a matter of empirical testing rather than reading documentation.
- Sources disagree on whether the API is genuinely available on every tier or gated to the upper plans, and the vendor's own materials are inconsistent enough that it needs confirming per account.
Voila Norbert
Strengths
- Unlimited team members on every prospecting plan on a shared credit pool, which makes team economics far better than any per-seat competitor in this category.
- Credits are charged only for successful finds and roll over rather than expiring, so the allowance maps to results.
- Standalone pay-as-you-go verification at 0.003 dollars an email, dropping to 0.001 above 500,000, is a genuine commodity price that needs no subscription.
- Standalone enrichment priced per email with volume tapering, also with no subscription, which suits a one-off CRM cleanup.
Limitations
- No phone numbers at all, on any plan, at any price, which removes Norbert from consideration for any team that calls.
- Per-lead pricing is high: roughly 0.049 dollars at the entry tier against Tomba's 0.0089 and Skrapp's 0.0145, and the gap does not close at volume.
- No searchable people database, so Norbert cannot help you decide who to contact, only how to reach someone you can already name.
- The 98 percent success claim is a marketing figure with no contractual guarantee behind it, unlike Anymail Finder's written commitment.
Pricing compared
GetProspect
Freemium subscription priced by the number of valid verified email addresses per month, with full feature access on every tier and roughly 30 percent off for annual billing.
- Free$0
- Starter$34
- Growth 5K$69
- Growth 20K$199
- Growth 50K$399
At 1,000 verified emails a month, Starter at 34 dollars on annual billing is about 0.034 dollars each, which is more expensive per unit than Skrapp or Icypeas but comes with the whole product rather than a trimmed one. At 5,000, the 69 dollar tier is roughly 0.014 dollars each and is the sweet spot of the ladder. At 10,000 you buy the 20,000-email tier at 199 dollars and pay about 0.02 dollars per address at your real volume, which is competitive with Hunter's Growth plan and considerably better than being forced up to Skrapp's 50,000-credit tier. The valid-only billing rule means all of these figures are close to true costs per usable contact rather than per attempt. Set against that, there are no phone numbers and no enrichment depth, so GetProspect is cheap for exactly one deliverable and useless for the others.
Voila Norbert
Subscription prospecting plans priced by monthly lead allowance with unlimited team members, plus separately priced pay-as-you-go verification and enrichment utilities, plus a distinct per-seat email sequencing product.
- Valet$49
- Butler$99
- Advisor$249
- Counselor$499
Per lead, Norbert is expensive: 1,000 finds for 49 dollars is about 0.049 each, five times Tomba's 0.0089 and more than three times Skrapp's 0.0145. At 10,000 you are on the 249 dollar Advisor tier paying about 0.025 per found address at your real volume, still well above the field. The case for Norbert therefore does not rest on unit price at all. It rests on unlimited seats, which for a five-person team turns a nominally expensive plan into a cheaper one than any per-seat competitor, and on the standalone verification price of 0.003 dollars per email, which is a genuine commodity rate that undercuts most dedicated verifiers and requires no subscription whatsoever. Buy the prospecting plan for the seat structure and the stability; buy the verification for the price. If you are a single user optimising cost per email, Norbert is simply the wrong choice and Tomba is the right one.
Editorial verdict on each
GetProspect
GetProspect is the most sensibly structured product in this part of the category, and the reason is a decision most vendors will not make: it sells volume rather than features. Everything, including the extension, the CRM, the Sheets add-on, and the integrations, is on the free plan, so evaluation is honest and upgrading is a single simple choice. Add a properly graded ladder from 1,000 to 50,000 valid emails a month and a billing rule that charges only for addresses its verifier will stand behind, and a small business gets something it can actually grow on rather than something it outgrows. The limits are real and worth stating plainly. There are no phone numbers, no intent data, no enrichment depth, no published API rate limits, no SSO, and thin public documentation on sourcing and legal basis. Buy it as a well-priced, well-structured email finder for a team that will send rather than call, and do not expect it to answer any question larger than what this person's work address is.
Read the full GetProspect profileVoila Norbert
Voila Norbert is the least exciting product in this batch and, for a particular kind of buyer, the correct one. Per lead it is expensive, several times Tomba's rate and well above Skrapp or GetProspect, and it sells no phone numbers, has no searchable database, and publishes almost nothing about how its data is sourced. What it does have is a set of structural choices that quietly matter more than unit price for a small team: unlimited seats on every plan, credits that roll over and are charged only on success, bulk and API access included rather than gated, and standalone verification at 0.003 dollars an email that undercuts most dedicated verifiers and needs no subscription. Behind that is twelve years of trading and seven under stable profitable ownership without a single repositioning. Buy it if you are a team rather than an individual, if you value a vendor that will still be here in three years, or if you simply need to clean a very large list cheaply. Do not buy it if you are one person optimising cost per address, because in that comparison it loses to almost everything.
Read the full Voila Norbert profileGetProspect profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; Voila Norbert last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.