SalesQL vs Wiza
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
Still shortlisting? Browse the best in B2B Data Providers for every option we track, with award winners called out.
The short answer
Editorial assessmentSalesQL compared with Wiza
Wiza is the closer comparison for Sales Navigator list export specifically, with strong bulk extraction and a cleaner list-building workflow. SalesQL covers more LinkedIn surfaces, including Recruiter and RPS, pools phones into the same credit as email, and ships an MCP server. If your work is exporting large Sales Navigator searches, look hard at Wiza; if it spans profiles, Recruiter, and ad hoc lookups, SalesQL covers more ground.
Choose SalesQL if
Salespeople and recruiters who prospect inside LinkedIn across profiles, Sales Navigator, and Recruiter, who need personal email addresses and mobile numbers alongside work emails, and who want a single credit pool with an explicit no-match-no-charge rule.
Choose Wiza if
Recruiters, lean outbound teams, and agencies that prospect from LinkedIn or Sales Navigator at meaningful volume and want verified-at-extraction data with pricing that stops punishing them per record, especially on the unlimited-email annual plans.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | SalesQL | Wiza |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Data | Data |
| Starting price | $0 (Free, 50 credits), then $39 per month (Basic) | $49/user/mo (Starter); unlimited emails from $990/user/yr (free plan available) |
| Pricing model | Freemium subscription priced by monthly credits drawn from a single pool covering emails and phone numbers alike, with included seats, a separate verification allowance, and roughly 25 percent off for annual billing. | Per-user plans with two regimes: monthly plans meter valid emails and phone numbers with overage pricing, while annual plans switch to unlimited email reveals (and unlimited phones on the top tier) bounded by a 2,500 exports/month fair-use cap. Credits are only consumed for valid, verified results. |
| Free plan | 50 credits and 100 email verifier credits per month for one user, limited to three folders, with email addresses only and no phone numbers, no CSV enrichment, and no API. | 20 valid emails and 5 phone numbers per month, with basic prospecting features. |
| Free trial | No time-limited trial; the permanent free tier is the evaluation path | No |
| Best for | Salespeople and recruiters who prospect inside LinkedIn across profiles, Sales Navigator, and Recruiter, who need personal email addresses and mobile numbers alongside work emails, and who want a single credit pool with an explicit no-match-no-charge rule. | Recruiters, lean outbound teams, and agencies that prospect from LinkedIn or Sales Navigator at meaningful volume and want verified-at-extraction data with pricing that stops punishing them per record, especially on the unlimited-email annual plans. |
| Setup time | Under ten minutes. Install the Chrome extension, sign in, open a LinkedIn profile. CRM connection adds fifteen minutes; API integration is a day or two depending on scope. | Minutes: install the extension, connect a CRM via OAuth, run a first export. There is no meaningful deployment project even for teams. |
| Learning curve | Very low, and lower than most competitors because there is only one credit type to understand. The one thing to internalise is that the free tier will not return phone numbers, so a free evaluation does not test the capability most buyers care about. | Very low. If a rep can run a Sales Navigator search, they can use Wiza; the only concepts to learn are credit mechanics and export destinations. |
| Platforms | Chrome extension, Web application, REST API, MCP server | Chrome extension, Web app (Wiza Prospect), API (Team plans) |
| Compliance | GDPR and CCPA referenced in the vendor's policies | SOC 2 Type 2 (Security criteria, Prescient Assurance, August 2026), GDPR-aligned processes (self-reported), CCPA opt-out handling |
| Founded | 2018 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Not publicly disclosed; the Chrome Web Store publisher is registered as SalesQL Ltd | Toronto, Ontario, Canada |
| Ownership | Privately held and independent | Bootstrapped, founder-led |
Strengths and limitations
SalesQL
Strengths
- An explicit written rule that a non-match costs nothing, applied to the API as well as the interface, which is the most important disclosure a vendor in this category can make.
- A single credit pool covering work email, personal email, and mobile numbers, which is far simpler and usually cheaper than the multi-meter models used by Kaspr and Tomba.
- Coverage of all four LinkedIn surfaces including Recruiter and Recruiter Professional Services, which most competing extensions do not handle.
- Personal email addresses alongside work ones, which Skrapp, GetProspect, and Hunter do not sell at all and which recruiting workflows depend on.
Limitations
- Still built around LinkedIn: the new in-app database search covers 200M+ professionals, but the extraction workflow the product is known for depends on your LinkedIn account staying in good standing.
- The free tier excludes phone numbers, so the capability most buyers want to evaluate is precisely the one the free plan will not let them test.
- No API on Free or Basic, so developer evaluation starts at 79 dollars a month.
- No published match-rate commitment, so the attractive per-credit price is not backed by any statement about how often a lookup actually returns something.
Wiza
Strengths
- Verify-at-extraction architecture genuinely delivers on low bounce claims; reviewers routinely place Wiza's valid-email rates at or near the top of the category.
- Only charging for valid results makes advertised volumes map to usable contacts, not attempts.
- Unlimited-email annual pricing ($990/user/year) is the aggressive move in the category and decisively undercuts credit models at volume.
- Recruiting is a first-class use case: Recruiter support plus personal emails and cell numbers serve a segment most B2B data tools treat as an afterthought.
Limitations
- The workflow still assumes LinkedIn (ideally Sales Navigator, a separate cost) as the primary search surface; Wiza Prospect is younger and shallower than dedicated databases as a standalone tool.
- No intent data, no technographics, and thin firmographic filtering compared with UpLead or the enterprise databases.
- Enterprise readiness is still early: the first SOC 2 Type 2 report (August 2026) covers the Security criteria over a three-month window, and SSO is not advertised on the marketing site.
- Per-user pricing with a 3-seat Team minimum compounds quickly for larger teams even though per-record cost is low.
Pricing compared
SalesQL
Freemium subscription priced by monthly credits drawn from a single pool covering emails and phone numbers alike, with included seats, a separate verification allowance, and roughly 25 percent off for annual billing.
- Free$0
- Basic$39
- Professional$79
- Organization$119
SalesQL is priced very well for what it does, and the single credit pool is why. At 1,000 lookups a month, Basic's 2,000 credits for 39 dollars is 0.0195 dollars per contact whether that contact is an email or a mobile number, and because misses are free that is a real figure. Compare it to a mobile number bought on Kaspr Business at roughly 0.40 euros or on Tomba at five credits, about 0.0445 dollars, and SalesQL is dramatically cheaper for phone-heavy work. At 10,000 a month, Organization's 12,000 credits for 119 dollars is roughly 0.0099 per contact, which is close to the cheapest credible per-mobile price published anywhere self-serve, and it comes with fifteen seats. The caveat is coverage rather than price: a cheap credit is only cheap if it matches, and SalesQL publishes no match-rate commitment, so a low unit price with poor hit rates on your particular segment is a worse deal than it looks. Test the free tier against your own list, remembering that the free tier withholds the phone numbers you most want to test.
Wiza
Per-user plans with two regimes: monthly plans meter valid emails and phone numbers with overage pricing, while annual plans switch to unlimited email reveals (and unlimited phones on the top tier) bounded by a 2,500 exports/month fair-use cap. Credits are only consumed for valid, verified results.
- Free$0
- Starter$49
- Email$99/mo monthly, or $990/year for unlimited
- Email + Phone$199/mo monthly, or $1,990/year for unlimited
- TeamCustom
On annual billing, Wiza's per-record economics are close to unbeatable for LinkedIn-based prospecting: $990 a year for up to 2,500 verified-email exports a month works out to about 3.3 cents per valid email at full utilization, an order of magnitude below UpLead-class credit pricing, with phones-included at double that. Monthly plans are far less interesting, essentially standard per-credit pricing with overage. The costs to weigh are per-seat multiplication across teams, the missing intent and technographic layers, and the dependence on LinkedIn's tolerance of extraction workflows, a structural risk every tool in this niche shares.
Editorial verdict on each
SalesQL
SalesQL is the best-structured LinkedIn extraction tool in this batch, and the reason is two decisions rather than any single feature. One credit buys any data type, so a phone-heavy month costs the same as an email-heavy one, and misses cost nothing, which SalesQL states in writing where five of the biggest names in this category will not. Add coverage of Recruiter and RPS, personal email addresses, fifteen seats on a 119 dollar plan, and an MCP server, and the value per dollar is genuinely hard to beat, particularly for anyone who needs mobile numbers. The reservations are about disclosure rather than product. Almost nothing is published about who runs the company, where the data comes from, or what legal basis supports it, there is no match-rate commitment behind the attractive unit price, and the free tier withholds phones so you cannot test the thing you are buying. Take it if LinkedIn is already your list and you want the cheapest honest credit in the category. Do not take it if a procurement questionnaire is coming, or if you need to build lists when LinkedIn is not available.
Read the full SalesQL profileWiza
Wiza is the best pure converter of LinkedIn attention into sendable, verified contact data, and its annual unlimited-email pricing is the sharpest offer in the category for volume prospectors and recruiters. The architecture bet, verify live at extraction and charge only for valid results, delivers exactly the accuracy the marketing claims, and the bootstrapped economics suggest the pricing is durable rather than promotional. What Wiza is not is a full data platform: no intent, no technographics, thin enterprise posture, and a workflow that inherits LinkedIn's platform risk. If your prospecting starts in Sales Navigator, buy it; if it starts with a firmographic query, start elsewhere.
Read the full Wiza profileSalesQL profile last reviewed 2026-09-26; Wiza last reviewed 2026-09-27. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.
The best in B2B Data Providers
26 trackedB2B data providers supply the contact and company information (emails, phone numbers, firmographics, and buying signals) that feeds prospecting lists and enrichment workflows.
The largest self-serve contact database in the category, fused with sequencing, data and execution in one product.
Accurate direct dials and a genuinely usable free tier make Lusha the lowest-friction entry point into paid B2B data.
Founded in 2022 and already at 40,000 users, Prospeo shipped AI Search, lookalikes, and an MCP server in 2025 as its database passed 280M leads.
Semantic search over the live web with contact data attached made prospecting a language problem rather than a database subscription.
Signup to verified emails in five minutes with zero configuration, and failed searches cost nothing, so nobody needs training to get value from Anymailfinder.
Frequently asked questions
6 questionsWhat is the difference between SalesQL and Wiza?
Wiza is the closer comparison for Sales Navigator list export specifically, with strong bulk extraction and a cleaner list-building workflow. SalesQL covers more LinkedIn surfaces, including Recruiter and RPS, pools phones into the same credit as email, and ships an MCP server. If your work is exporting large Sales Navigator searches, look hard at Wiza; if it spans profiles, Recruiter, and ad hoc lookups, SalesQL covers more ground.
Is SalesQL or Wiza cheaper?
SalesQL starts at $0 (Free, 50 credits), then $39 per month (Basic). Wiza starts at $49/user/mo (Starter); unlimited emails from $990/user/yr (free plan available). The billing models differ, so the entry price is rarely the whole cost. SalesQL pricing model: Freemium subscription priced by monthly credits drawn from a single pool covering emails and phone numbers alike, with included seats, a separate verification allowance, and roughly 25 percent off for annual billing. Wiza pricing model: Per-user plans with two regimes: monthly plans meter valid emails and phone numbers with overage pricing, while annual plans switch to unlimited email reveals (and unlimited phones on the top tier) bounded by a 2,500 exports/month fair-use cap.
Does SalesQL or Wiza have a free plan?
SalesQL has a free plan. 50 credits and 100 email verifier credits per month for one user, limited to three folders, with email addresses only and no phone numbers, no CSV enrichment, and no API. Trial terms: No time-limited trial; the permanent free tier is the evaluation path. Wiza has a free plan. 20 valid emails and 5 phone numbers per month, with basic prospecting features.
Who should choose SalesQL?
Salespeople and recruiters who prospect inside LinkedIn across profiles, Sales Navigator, and Recruiter, who need personal email addresses and mobile numbers alongside work emails, and who want a single credit pool with an explicit no-match-no-charge rule.
Who should choose Wiza?
Recruiters, lean outbound teams, and agencies that prospect from LinkedIn or Sales Navigator at meaningful volume and want verified-at-extraction data with pricing that stops punishing them per record, especially on the unlimited-email annual plans.
What are the best alternatives to SalesQL and Wiza?
SaaSTracker profiles 26 products in B2B Data Providers. The Summer 2026 awards in the category went to Apollo.io (Category Leader), Lusha (Best Value), Prospeo (Momentum). Every profile is compiled from primary sources, so a shortlist can be built from pricing, limitations, and fit rather than from star ratings.
