SalesQL logoWiza logo

SalesQL vs Wiza

An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.

The short answer

Editorial assessment

SalesQL compared with Wiza

Wiza is the closer comparison for Sales Navigator list export specifically, with strong bulk extraction and a cleaner list-building workflow. SalesQL covers more LinkedIn surfaces, including Recruiter and RPS, pools phones into the same credit as email, and ships an MCP server. If your work is exporting large Sales Navigator searches, look hard at Wiza; if it spans profiles, Recruiter, and ad hoc lookups, SalesQL covers more ground.

Choose SalesQL if

Salespeople and recruiters who prospect inside LinkedIn across profiles, Sales Navigator, and Recruiter, who need personal email addresses and mobile numbers alongside work emails, and who want a single credit pool with an explicit no-match-no-charge rule.

Choose Wiza if

Recruiters, lean outbound teams, and agencies that prospect from LinkedIn or Sales Navigator at meaningful volume and want verified-at-extraction data with pricing that stops punishing them per record, especially on the unlimited-email annual plans.

Side by side

13 attributes
AttributeSalesQLWiza
CategoryDataData
Starting price$0 (Free, 50 credits), then $39 per month (Basic) (free plan available)$49/user/mo (Starter); unlimited emails from $990/user/yr (free plan available)
Pricing modelFreemium subscription priced by monthly credits drawn from a single pool covering emails and phone numbers alike, with included seats, a separate verification allowance, and roughly 25 percent off for annual billing.Per-user plans with two regimes: monthly plans meter valid emails and phone numbers with overage pricing, while annual plans switch to unlimited email reveals (and unlimited phones on the top tier) bounded by a 2,500 exports/month fair-use cap. Credits are only consumed for valid, verified results.
Free plan50 credits and 100 email verifier credits per month for one user, limited to three folders, with email addresses only and no phone numbers, no CSV enrichment, and no API.20 valid emails and 5 phone numbers per month, with basic prospecting features.
Free trialNo time-limited trial; the permanent free tier is the evaluation pathNo
Best forSalespeople and recruiters who prospect inside LinkedIn across profiles, Sales Navigator, and Recruiter, who need personal email addresses and mobile numbers alongside work emails, and who want a single credit pool with an explicit no-match-no-charge rule.Recruiters, lean outbound teams, and agencies that prospect from LinkedIn or Sales Navigator at meaningful volume and want verified-at-extraction data with pricing that stops punishing them per record, especially on the unlimited-email annual plans.
Setup timeUnder ten minutes. Install the Chrome extension, sign in, open a LinkedIn profile. CRM connection adds fifteen minutes; API integration is a day or two depending on scope.Minutes: install the extension, connect a CRM via OAuth, run a first export. There is no meaningful deployment project even for teams.
Learning curveVery low, and lower than most competitors because there is only one credit type to understand. The one thing to internalise is that the free tier will not return phone numbers, so a free evaluation does not test the capability most buyers care about.Very low. If a rep can run a Sales Navigator search, they can use Wiza; the only concepts to learn are credit mechanics and export destinations.
PlatformsChrome extension, Web application, REST API, MCP serverChrome extension, Web app (Wiza Prospect), API (Team plans)
ComplianceGDPR and CCPA referenced in the vendor's policiesGDPR-aligned processes (self-reported), CCPA opt-out handling
Founded20182019
HeadquartersNot publicly disclosed; the Chrome Web Store publisher is registered as SalesQL LtdToronto, Ontario, Canada
OwnershipPrivately held and independentBootstrapped, founder-led

Strengths and limitations

SalesQL

Strengths

  • An explicit written rule that a non-match costs nothing, applied to the API as well as the interface, which is the most important disclosure a vendor in this category can make.
  • A single credit pool covering work email, personal email, and mobile numbers, which is far simpler and usually cheaper than the multi-meter models used by Kaspr and Tomba.
  • Coverage of all four LinkedIn surfaces including Recruiter and Recruiter Professional Services, which most competing extensions do not handle.
  • Personal email addresses alongside work ones, which Skrapp, GetProspect, and Hunter do not sell at all and which recruiting workflows depend on.

Limitations

  • Entirely dependent on LinkedIn: there is no meaningful standalone database to search, so the product is only as available as your LinkedIn account is.
  • The free tier excludes phone numbers, so the capability most buyers want to evaluate is precisely the one the free plan will not let them test.
  • No API on Free or Basic, so developer evaluation starts at 79 dollars a month.
  • The promised email sequencing feature is announced rather than shipped, and buying on the expectation of it is buying a roadmap.

Wiza

Strengths

  • Verify-at-extraction architecture genuinely delivers on low bounce claims; reviewers routinely place Wiza's valid-email rates at or near the top of the category.
  • Only charging for valid results makes advertised volumes map to usable contacts, not attempts.
  • Unlimited-email annual pricing ($990/user/year) is the aggressive move in the category and decisively undercuts credit models at volume.
  • Recruiting is a first-class use case: Recruiter support plus personal emails and cell numbers serve a segment most B2B data tools treat as an afterthought.

Limitations

  • The workflow still assumes LinkedIn (ideally Sales Navigator, a separate cost) as the primary search surface; Wiza Prospect is younger and shallower than dedicated databases as a standalone tool.
  • No intent data, no technographics, and thin firmographic filtering compared with UpLead or the enterprise databases.
  • Enterprise readiness is limited: no published SOC 2 report or SSO on the marketing site, which stalls security reviews at larger buyers.
  • Per-user pricing with a 3-seat Team minimum compounds quickly for larger teams even though per-record cost is low.

Pricing compared

SalesQL

Freemium subscription priced by monthly credits drawn from a single pool covering emails and phone numbers alike, with included seats, a separate verification allowance, and roughly 25 percent off for annual billing.

  • Free$0
  • Basic$39
  • Professional$79
  • Organization$119

SalesQL is priced very well for what it does, and the single credit pool is why. At 1,000 lookups a month, Basic's 2,000 credits for 39 dollars is 0.0195 dollars per contact whether that contact is an email or a mobile number, and because misses are free that is a real figure. Compare it to a mobile number bought on Kaspr Business at roughly 0.40 euros or on Tomba at five credits, about 0.0445 dollars, and SalesQL is dramatically cheaper for phone-heavy work. At 10,000 a month, Organization's 12,000 credits for 119 dollars is roughly 0.0099 per contact, which is close to the cheapest credible per-mobile price published anywhere self-serve, and it comes with fifteen seats. The caveat is coverage rather than price: a cheap credit is only cheap if it matches, and SalesQL publishes no match-rate commitment, so a low unit price with poor hit rates on your particular segment is a worse deal than it looks. Test the free tier against your own list, remembering that the free tier withholds the phone numbers you most want to test.

Wiza

Per-user plans with two regimes: monthly plans meter valid emails and phone numbers with overage pricing, while annual plans switch to unlimited email reveals (and unlimited phones on the top tier) bounded by a 2,500 exports/month fair-use cap. Credits are only consumed for valid, verified results.

  • Free$0
  • Starter$49
  • Email$99/mo monthly, or $990/year for unlimited
  • Email + Phone$199/mo monthly, or $1,990/year for unlimited
  • TeamCustom

On annual billing, Wiza's per-record economics are close to unbeatable for LinkedIn-based prospecting: $990 a year for up to 2,500 verified-email exports a month works out to about 3.3 cents per valid email at full utilization, an order of magnitude below UpLead-class credit pricing, with phones-included at double that. Monthly plans are far less interesting, essentially standard per-credit pricing with overage. The costs to weigh are per-seat multiplication across teams, the missing intent and technographic layers, and the dependence on LinkedIn's tolerance of extraction workflows, a structural risk every tool in this niche shares.

Editorial verdict on each

SalesQL

SalesQL is the best-structured LinkedIn extraction tool in this batch, and the reason is two decisions rather than any single feature. One credit buys any data type, so a phone-heavy month costs the same as an email-heavy one, and misses cost nothing, which SalesQL states in writing where five of the biggest names in this category will not. Add coverage of Recruiter and RPS, personal email addresses, fifteen seats on a 119 dollar plan, and an MCP server, and the value per dollar is genuinely hard to beat, particularly for anyone who needs mobile numbers. The reservations are about disclosure rather than product. Almost nothing is published about who runs the company, where the data comes from, or what legal basis supports it, there is no match-rate commitment behind the attractive unit price, and the free tier withholds phones so you cannot test the thing you are buying. Take it if LinkedIn is already your list and you want the cheapest honest credit in the category. Do not take it if a procurement questionnaire is coming, or if you need to build lists when LinkedIn is not available.

Read the full SalesQL profile

Wiza

Wiza is the best pure converter of LinkedIn attention into sendable, verified contact data, and its annual unlimited-email pricing is the sharpest offer in the category for volume prospectors and recruiters. The architecture bet, verify live at extraction and charge only for valid results, delivers exactly the accuracy the marketing claims, and the bootstrapped economics suggest the pricing is durable rather than promotional. What Wiza is not is a full data platform: no intent, no technographics, thin enterprise posture, and a workflow that inherits LinkedIn's platform risk. If your prospecting starts in Sales Navigator, buy it; if it starts with a firmographic query, start elsewhere.

Read the full Wiza profile

SalesQL profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; Wiza last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.