Apify vs Zenrows
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Editorial assessmentZenrows compared with Apify
Different layers of the same job. Apify is a platform: a marketplace of prebuilt scrapers, a scheduler, storage, and a runtime you deploy code into. Zenrows is the access layer only, one endpoint that returns a page. If you want a working LinkedIn or Google Maps scraper today with somewhere to put the results, Apify is the shorter path. If you already have a pipeline and the only failing part is getting the HTML back, Zenrows is the cheaper and more focused fix, and plenty of teams run an Apify actor that calls Zenrows underneath.
Choose Apify if
Growth, RevOps, and data teams that need custom web data at a scale a manual list build cannot reach, and that want ready-made scrapers for the common sources with an escape hatch into custom code when a target is unusual. Also strong for anyone wiring web data into an AI agent through MCP.
Choose Zenrows if
Technical go-to-market operators, data teams, and AI agent builders who need live content from sites that block ordinary requests, and who would rather pay per successful page than run and maintain their own proxy and headless browser infrastructure.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Apify | Zenrows |
|---|---|---|
| Category | GTM Engineering | GTM Engineering |
| Starting price | Free with $5 of monthly platform credit; paid plans from $29 per month ($26 billed annually) (free plan available) | Free (5,000 credits per month); paid plans from $19 per month, or about $16 per month billed annually (free plan available) |
| Pricing model | Prepaid platform credit with usage metered against it. Each plan includes a monthly credit allowance equal to its price, consumed by compute units (memory multiplied by run time), proxy bandwidth, storage operations, and data transfer. Rented or paid Store Actors carry their own fees on top, set by the Actor's developer as a monthly rental, a per-event charge, or a per-result charge. Seats are not the pricing axis; usage is. | Credit-based subscription with one shared balance across Fetch, Extract, Browser Sessions, and Batch. Credit cost varies by difficulty: one credit for a plain request, five with JavaScript rendering, ten with premium proxies, twenty-five for a protected page needing both, and 25,000 credits per gigabyte of residential proxy traffic. Plans also step up concurrency, which is often the binding constraint before credits are. |
| Free plan | $5 of platform credit per month, community support, limited trial access to rented Actors, and access blocked rather than billed once credit is spent | 5,000 credits per month, 5 concurrent requests, every feature unlocked, community support only, no rollover |
| Free trial | Free plan with no credit card required, plus limited trials on most paid Store Actors | No time-limited trial; the free plan is permanent and requires no card |
| Best for | Growth, RevOps, and data teams that need custom web data at a scale a manual list build cannot reach, and that want ready-made scrapers for the common sources with an escape hatch into custom code when a target is unusual. Also strong for anyone wiring web data into an AI agent through MCP. | Technical go-to-market operators, data teams, and AI agent builders who need live content from sites that block ordinary requests, and who would rather pay per successful page than run and maintain their own proxy and headless browser infrastructure. |
| Setup time | Minutes for a first Store Actor run: sign up, pick an Actor, fill the form, export a CSV. A scheduled pipeline with proxy configuration, webhooks, and a downstream destination is a half day. A custom Actor is a normal software project, measured in days, and its length depends on how hard the target defends itself rather than on Apify. | Minutes for a first successful request: sign up, copy the API key, paste the sample call. Getting a specific hard target working reliably takes longer, usually a session of testing which combination of JavaScript rendering, premium proxies, country, and wait conditions that particular site requires. |
| Learning curve | Low to run existing Actors, moderate to operate the platform well. The two things that take time are understanding the cost model well enough to predict a bill, and learning which proxy and browser settings a given target requires. Writing Actors requires working JavaScript or Python. | Low for anyone comfortable with an HTTP client, meaningful for anyone who is not. The concepts that take longest are not the API but the domain: why a request needs residential IPs, what a fingerprint check is doing, and how to write backoff logic that does not trip the abuse protection. |
| Platforms | Web console, REST API, JavaScript and Python API clients, Apify CLI, Docker-based Actor runtime, Hosted MCP server | REST API, Python, Node.js, and Go SDKs, Command line client, Proxy endpoint (username and password), Chrome DevTools Protocol for Browser Sessions, MCP server for Claude Code, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Zed, and JetBrains |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, CCPA | GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Founded | 2015 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Prague, Czech Republic | Getxo, Spain |
| Ownership | Independent, venture-backed | Independent, venture-backed |
Strengths and limitations
Apify
Strengths
- The Store is the moat: for most common data sources, someone has already built, debugged, and now maintains the scraper, which collapses a two-week project into an afternoon of configuration.
- Real infrastructure underneath, with proxies, headless browsers, storage, scheduling, and retries handled rather than left as an exercise.
- Genuinely usable free tier with $5 of monthly credit, no credit card, and full API and MCP access, so evaluation costs nothing.
- Crawlee is open source and runs anywhere, which meaningfully limits lock-in for teams writing their own crawlers.
Limitations
- Compute-unit billing is hard to predict before you run a job, because cost is memory multiplied by time and both depend on how the target site behaves that day.
- Included platform credit expires monthly with no rollover, so buying a tier for occasional heavy months means paying for unused capacity in the quiet ones.
- Store Actor quality is uneven; some are abandoned, some break silently when a target site changes markup, and the run-success statistics on the Actor page are the only pre-purchase signal.
- Paid Actors add a second billing layer on top of platform credit, and the total cost of a workflow is not visible from any single number on the pricing page.
Zenrows
Strengths
- Genuinely high success rates on Cloudflare, DataDome, and PerimeterX protected pages, which is the one thing this category is bought for.
- One shared credit balance across retrieval, extraction, browser sessions, and batch jobs, so you are not forecasting four separate meters.
- A permanent free tier with every feature unlocked, which lets you measure real credit consumption against your actual targets before paying.
- Markdown output and an official MCP server make it usable by AI agents without a parsing or integration layer of your own.
Limitations
- Credit multipliers make budgeting genuinely difficult: the same 45,000 credit plan is 45,000 plain pages or 1,800 protected ones, and most people discover the difference after their first month.
- Extract is still in beta and only covers supported site patterns; on anything else you fall back to parsing HTML yourself, which is the maintenance burden the feature exists to remove.
- Premium and JavaScript-rendered calls do not automatically fall back to a cheaper mode when they fail, so your client has to implement the escalation logic itself.
- Sending too many failing requests in a short window can get your API key temporarily blocked by the platform's own abuse protection, which surprises teams that ship without backoff.
Pricing compared
Apify
Prepaid platform credit with usage metered against it. Each plan includes a monthly credit allowance equal to its price, consumed by compute units (memory multiplied by run time), proxy bandwidth, storage operations, and data transfer. Rented or paid Store Actors carry their own fees on top, set by the Actor's developer as a monthly rental, a per-event charge, or a per-result charge. Seats are not the pricing axis; usage is.
- Free$0
- Starter$29
- Scale$199
- Business$999
Judged against building the same thing yourself, Apify is inexpensive: a residential proxy pool, headless browser fleet, retry logic, and storage would cost more than $29 a month in engineering attention alone, before any infrastructure. Judged against a fixed-price scraping tool, it is harder to compare, because you are buying capacity rather than a defined output, and the honest answer for month one is that you cannot forecast the bill precisely. The mitigation is straightforward: run the job once at a small limit, read the usage breakdown, multiply. Teams that do this usually find the real cost of a recurring list build lands in the tens of dollars a month, and teams that skip it are the ones who write reviews about unpredictable pricing.
Zenrows
Credit-based subscription with one shared balance across Fetch, Extract, Browser Sessions, and Batch. Credit cost varies by difficulty: one credit for a plain request, five with JavaScript rendering, ten with premium proxies, twenty-five for a protected page needing both, and 25,000 credits per gigabyte of residential proxy traffic. Plans also step up concurrency, which is often the binding constraint before credits are.
- Free$0
- BuildFrom $19
- LaunchFrom $69
- GrowthFrom $199
- ScaleFrom $549
Priced against the alternative, which is running your own residential proxy contract plus a headless browser fleet plus the engineer who maintains both, Zenrows is straightforwardly cheap at the low end. A team spending nineteen dollars a month to keep an enrichment workflow alive is making an obvious trade. The economics get harder to defend in two places: high-volume crawling of plain HTML, where you are paying an anti-bot premium you do not need, and heavy protected-page work, where the twenty-five credit multiplier compounds fast enough that Scale tier bills arrive sooner than the credit headline suggests. The single shared balance across all four products is a real advantage over vendors that meter each separately, and the permanent free tier makes it possible to measure your own credit burn on your own targets before committing to anything.
Editorial verdict on each
Apify
Apify is the most complete web scraping platform a small team can buy without a sales call, and its real asset is the Store: for the sources most go-to-market teams need, someone has already written and is still maintaining the scraper, which is the difference between a two-week engineering project and an afternoon. Underneath it, the proxy pool, browser fleet, storage, and scheduling are the parts people underestimate until they have tried to build them, and Crawlee being open source keeps the lock-in honest. The MCP server has made it one of the more useful data sources to hand an AI agent. The cost of all this is a billing model you have to learn: compute metered by memory times time, credit that expires monthly, and a second layer of fees on paid Actors that no headline price reflects. Budget an hour to measure one representative job before committing, set a spending limit on day one, and check an Actor's success rate before you depend on it. Do those three things and it is very good value; skip them and you will write one of the reviews about unpredictable pricing.
Read the full Apify profileZenrows
Zenrows does one thing that is hard and does it well: it gets the page back. For a go-to-market team whose differentiating data lives on sites that reject plain HTTP requests, that is worth far more than the nineteen dollars the first paid tier costs, and the permanent free plan means you can prove it against your own targets before spending anything. The 2026 restructuring into Fetch, Extract, Browser Sessions, and Batch on a single shared credit balance is a real improvement in both clarity and budgeting, and the MCP server makes it one of the more practical ways to give an AI agent honest access to the live web. The reservations are specific rather than generic. Credit multipliers mean the headline allowance tells you almost nothing until you know your target mix, Extract is still beta and falls back to hand parsing on unsupported sites, and there is no scheduling or storage layer, so Zenrows is a component and not a pipeline. Buy it as infrastructure, benchmark it on the free tier against the sites you actually care about, and keep a fallback plan for the targets where nothing reaches one hundred percent.
Read the full Zenrows profileApify profile last reviewed 2026-08-23; Zenrows last reviewed 2026-08-23. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.