Bubbles
Async video that replies to itself instead of ending in an email
Bubbles is an async video collaboration tool that combines screen and camera recording with threaded video replies, comments anchored to a moment on screen, organized channels, and an AI notetaker that joins live meetings to record, transcribe, and summarize them, so a team can carry a conversation across time zones without booking a call; it runs as a Chrome extension and desktop app with a free tier allowing unlimited screen recordings up to 30 minutes.
Overview
Bubbles was founded in 2018 by Tom Medema, a former CTO who taught himself to code at ten and sold a company in high school, and who built Bubbles out of the specific frustration of running distributed engineering teams. It raised $8.5M led by Khosla Ventures with Craft Ventures, Streamlined Ventures, 468 Ventures, and Bain Capital participating, plus angels including Naval Ravikant and Jeff Morris Jr. The original pitch was fighting Zoom fatigue, and that framing still describes the product accurately.
The design difference from Loom is the reply. In Loom you record, you send a link, and the response comes back as an email or a Slack message somewhere else. In Bubbles the response is another video, threaded under the first, in a channel where the whole exchange lives together. Comments and video replies attach to a specific moment on screen, so a design critique or a code review reads as a conversation rather than a series of disconnected artifacts.
Since 2023 Bubbles has expanded sideways into meeting recording. An AI notetaker joins your calendar meetings, records and transcribes them, produces summaries and action items delivered by email and calendar, and then lets people comment and reply with video on the recording so the follow-up call becomes unnecessary. That makes it two products in one subscription, which is either good value or a loss of focus depending on how you feel about scope.
The pricing is the friendliest in this category for a small team. The free Basic plan allows unlimited screen recordings up to 30 minutes each, five meeting recordings a week, AI summaries, and a notetaker on all meetings, with recordings locking after two weeks. Pro Teams is $12 per member per month billed yearly or $15 monthly for teams of three or more. Pro Personal is $18 yearly or $22 monthly for one or two people, which automatically converts to Pro Teams pricing once a third member joins.
Best for
Distributed teams of three to thirty who want to replace recurring calls with threaded async video conversation, especially engineering, design, and product groups that also want their live meetings recorded and summarized under the same subscription.
Not the right fit for
- Sales prospecting of any kind; there is no dynamic personalization, no per-prospect landing page, no CRM writeback, and no animated GIF thumbnail, so Vidyard, Sendspark, Potion, and Dubb all exist for reasons Bubbles does not address.
- Teams that need embedding everywhere; Loom's player unfurls natively across 400-plus tools and Bubbles' distribution story is far narrower, which matters if your documentation lives in Confluence or Notion.
- Companies with strict rules about bots joining calls; the AI notetaker is a participant in the meeting, and on the free tier it joins all meetings by default with recipient control reserved for Pro.
- Anyone who needs recordings to persist on a free plan; free recordings lock after two weeks, so the archive erodes unless you pay.
- Buyers wanting enterprise compliance documentation on a self-serve tier; advanced security is handled through enterprise conversations rather than published on the pricing page.
How it works
- 1
You record from the Chrome extension or the desktop app: screen, camera, both, or a full-page screenshot. Free users get unlimited screen recordings at up to 30 minutes each, which is a far higher ceiling than most free tiers.
- 2
The recording lands in a channel rather than only in your clipboard. Channels organize by project, team, or topic, so a video is filed where the conversation about it belongs instead of vanishing into a link somebody pasted three weeks ago.
- 3
Teammates respond with video replies and comments anchored to a moment on the screen. That threading is the core mechanic: a five-message video thread replaces a thirty-minute call and preserves the reasoning in a searchable place.
- 4
Separately, the AI notetaker joins your Google Meet or Zoom calls from Google Calendar or Outlook, records and transcribes them, and produces a summary and action items delivered by email and written back to the calendar event. On Pro you control which meetings it joins and who receives the recording.
- 5
Everything is searchable and shareable with teammates or external guests, and integrations flow through native Google Meet and Zoom support, 200-plus Zapier connections, and AI chat connectors for ChatGPT and Claude.
Feature breakdown
22 features in 4 modulesAsync video conversation
The threading model that separates Bubbles from a link-and-hope recorder.- Video replies
- Respond to a recording with another recording, threaded underneath it, so a conversation accumulates in one place instead of scattering across email and Slack.
- Comments anchored on screen
- Tag anything on the screen and discuss it in context, which is the original product idea and still what makes design and code review work well here.
- Channels
- Organize recordings by project, team, or topic. Free is limited to two channels; Pro removes the limit, which is the practical reason most teams upgrade.
- Unlimited screen recordings on free
- The free Basic plan does not cap how many screen recordings you make, only their length at 30 minutes, which is a dramatically more usable free tier than Loom's 25 videos at five minutes.
- Full-page screenshots
- Capture an entire page rather than only the viewport, for cases where a still with annotation communicates faster than a recording.
- Guest sharing
- Share recordings and threads with people outside the workspace, so a client or contractor can join a conversation without a seat.
AI notetaker and meeting recording
The second product, folded into the same subscription.- Automatic calendar joining
- The notetaker joins meetings from Google Calendar or Outlook, records, and transcribes. On free it joins all meetings; Pro adds control over which meetings it attends.
- AI summaries and action items
- Instant summaries and extracted action items delivered by email and written into the corresponding calendar event.
- AI transcripts
- Full transcripts on Pro, with basic AI summaries available even on the free plan.
- Five meeting recordings a week on free
- The free meter is weekly rather than monthly, and Pro makes meetings unlimited alongside unlimited recording length.
- Comment and reply on meeting recordings
- The async layer applies to live meetings too, so the follow-up call about what was said in the last call becomes a video thread instead.
- Recipient control
- Pro lets you choose who receives a recording rather than defaulting to everyone who was invited, which matters for sensitive conversations.
Organization and search
Making a growing archive usable rather than an unsorted pile of links.- Unified workspace
- Async recordings and meeting recordings live in the same searchable place rather than in two separate tools.
- Search across recordings
- Find the moment something was said across the library using transcripts rather than scrubbing through videos.
- Video hubs
- Centralized collections so a project's recordings can be handed to a new joiner as a single reference rather than a list of links.
- Two-week lock on free recordings
- Free recordings lock after two weeks. This is the free tier's real constraint and it is an honest one: generous while you are working, not a permanent archive.
Branding, integrations, and platform
Adequate rather than expansive.- Chrome extension
- Record live meetings or your screen and voice from the browser in one click, which is where most Bubbles usage starts.
- Desktop applications
- Recording across multiple meeting platforms from the desktop rather than only inside a browser tab.
- Native Google Meet and Zoom support
- First-party meeting platform integration rather than screen capture as a workaround.
- 200-plus Zapier integrations
- Automation reach into the rest of the stack, which is how Bubbles connects to tools it does not natively support.
- ChatGPT and Claude connectors
- AI chat connectors let external assistants read your recordings and notes, so meeting context becomes queryable from the assistant you already use.
- Custom branding options
- Pro adds branding controls so recordings shared with clients look like they came from your company.
Use cases
4 documentedDistributed engineering team across four time zones
Standup exists so three people can hear one update, and the real technical discussion happens in a Slack thread that nobody can follow a week later.
Recorded updates land in a channel, technical disagreements resolve in video threads with comments anchored to the code on screen, and the reasoning stays searchable instead of scrolling away.
Design team running critique
Written feedback on a mockup reads harsher than intended and a live critique means finding a slot that works for six people.
A recorded walkthrough with comments tagged on specific elements, answered by video replies in the same thread, carries tone and context without a calendar negotiation.
Startup that wants meeting notes without a separate subscription
The team already wants async video and is separately evaluating an AI notetaker, which means two tools and two bills for a five-person company.
Pro Teams at $12 per member covers unlimited async recording and unlimited meeting recording with transcripts and summaries in one subscription.
Agency collaborating with external clients
Client feedback arrives as vague emails referencing things the account manager has to guess at.
Guest sharing lets the client comment directly on the screen and reply with video, custom branding keeps the experience on-brand, and the whole exchange stays in one channel per project.
Pricing
from $0 (Basic), then $12 per member per month billed yearly (Pro Teams)Freemium per-member subscription with pricing that adjusts automatically based on team size, discounted for yearly billing.
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Basic | $0 per member per month |
Unlimited screen recordings at 30 minutes is six times Loom's free length cap with no count limit; the two-week lock is the catch. |
| Pro Teams | $12 per member per month billed yearly, $15 billed monthly |
For teams of three or more. Includes a 14-day free trial and pro-rata credits when changing tiers. |
| Pro Personal | $18 per member per month billed yearly, $22 billed monthly |
Paying more per seat for a smaller team is unusual but honest: the automatic downgrade to $12 when a third person joins means you are never stuck on it. |
Billing notes
- Yearly billing takes Pro Teams from $15 to $12 and Pro Personal from $22 to $18 per member per month.
- Pricing adjusts automatically with team size: a Pro Personal workspace moves to Pro Teams rates once it reaches three members, which is the correct direction for that adjustment to run.
- Pro-rata credits apply when changing tiers, so growing or shrinking mid-cycle does not waste money.
- The free plan's binding constraint is the two-week lock on recordings rather than a count or length cap, which is a friendlier structure while you are working and useless as an archive.
- Enterprise customers are supported with advanced security features but there is no published enterprise tier on the pricing page.
Value assessment: Bubbles at $12 per member per month billed yearly is the cheapest capable team tier in this category and it bundles two products. You get unlimited async recording with threaded video replies plus unlimited AI-notetaken meetings with transcripts and summaries, for less than Loom Business at $15 which does only the first and less than most standalone meeting notetakers which do only the second. The free tier is genuinely usable, with unlimited screen recordings at 30 minutes and a notetaker on every meeting, constrained only by a two-week lock. The value case fails for exactly one reason: none of this helps you sell anything. Judged as internal team infrastructure it is the best price-to-capability ratio here; judged as a sales tool it scores zero because it is not one.
Strengths & limitations
Strengths
- Threaded video replies and on-screen anchored comments make async video a conversation rather than a broadcast, which is a structurally better model for replacing meetings than a link and an email.
- The most usable free tier in this category for real work: unlimited screen recordings at 30 minutes each plus five AI-notetaken meetings a week.
- Two products in one subscription, async video collaboration and meeting recording with transcripts and summaries, at $12 per member per month billed yearly.
- Channels give recordings a home, which is why Bubbles archives stay navigable while collections of Loom links generally do not.
- Pricing that adjusts automatically with team size, with pro-rata credits on tier changes and an honest downgrade from Pro Personal to Pro Teams rates as the team grows.
- ChatGPT and Claude connectors make meeting and recording context queryable from the assistant a team already uses rather than trapping it in another dashboard.
- Backed by $8.5M from Khosla Ventures, Craft Ventures, and Bain Capital with angels including Naval Ravikant, so the company is properly funded for its size.
Limitations
- Nothing here serves sales: no dynamic personalization, no per-prospect landing pages, no CRM writeback, no animated GIF thumbnails, and no view-based follow-up automation.
- Free recordings lock after two weeks, so the free tier is a working surface rather than an archive and the value of your library depends on paying.
- Embedding and distribution are much narrower than Loom's 400-plus tool coverage, which matters if your documentation lives in Confluence or Notion.
- The AI notetaker is a bot that joins the call, which some organizations and some clients will not accept, and on the free tier it joins every meeting by default.
- Editing is minimal compared with Loom's trim, stitch, annotate, and filler-word removal, so a recording is largely what you recorded.
- Enterprise security features exist but are not published on the pricing page, so a formal security review means a conversation rather than a document.
- Scope has broadened from async collaboration into meeting notes, which puts Bubbles into competition with a crowded notetaker market it does not obviously win.
Head-to-head comparisons
3 alternativesBubbles vs Loom
from $0 (Starter), then $18 per user per month billed monthly (Business)Loom is the better recorder with better editing, transcription in 50-plus languages, embedding across 400-plus tools, and Atlassian's security behind it, at $15 to $20 a seat. Bubbles is cheaper at $12, has a far more generous free tier, threads video replies into channels, and throws in an AI meeting notetaker. Take Loom if embedding and reliability decide it; take Bubbles if you want the conversation around the recording and a second product in the same bill.
Full Bubbles vs Loom comparisonBubbles vs Vidyard
from $0 (Free), then $59 per user per month billed annually (Starter)Vidyard exists to put video in front of prospects and log the engagement against a CRM record, at $59 per seat annually with CRM behind a quote. Bubbles has no prospect-facing machinery at all and costs $12 per member. They are not really alternatives: buy Bubbles for how your team talks to itself and Vidyard for how your reps talk to buyers, and expect some companies to run both.
Full Bubbles vs Vidyard comparisonBubbles vs Bonjoro
from $0 (Free), then $15 per month billed annually (Starter)Bonjoro is external one-to-one video fired by CRM lifecycle triggers, unlimited from $15 a month, aimed at onboarding and retention. Bubbles is internal async conversation with threaded replies at $12 per member. Neither can do the other's job, and a small company that cares about both async collaboration and customer relationship video will end up buying both without much overlap in spend.
Full Bubbles vs Bonjoro comparisonImplementation & onboarding
- Setup time
- Fifteen minutes. Install the Chrome extension or desktop app, connect Google Calendar or Outlook if you want the notetaker, create a channel, and record. The free tier means the first month costs nothing and proves whether the habit forms.
- Learning curve
- Low mechanically, moderate culturally. Recording and replying are obvious. The change that has to be agreed explicitly is that a video reply is an acceptable answer, because if half the team responds by asking for a call the threading model never engages and you have bought an expensive recorder.
- Onboarding
- Fully self-serve on Basic and both Pro tiers, with a 14-day trial and pro-rata credits when changing tier. Enterprise arrangements exist for advanced security but are handled through conversation rather than a published plan.
- Migration notes
- There is no bulk importer from another recorder, so historical Loom archives stay where they are. Coming out of Bubbles, recordings can be downloaded but the threaded conversation structure has no equivalent elsewhere, so the discussion context is what you lose rather than the video. Free-tier users should note the two-week lock applies while you are evaluating.
Platform, API & security
- Platforms
- Chrome extensionDesktop applicationWeb
- API
- 200-plus integrations via Zapier plus AI chat connectors for ChatGPT and Claude; native Google Meet and Zoom support. No general-purpose public API is published on self-serve tiers.
- Compliance
- GDPRAdvanced security features available for enterprise customers on request
- Data residency
- Not published as a self-serve option.
- SSO
- Not published on self-serve tiers; handled as part of enterprise arrangements.
- Security notes
- Pro adds control over which meetings the notetaker joins and who receives a recording, which is the most meaningful privacy control in the product given that the notetaker is a participant in live calls. Enterprise security features are available on request rather than documented on the pricing page.
Support & resources
- Channels
- Email and in-app supportHelp centerEnterprise support arrangements on request
- Documentation
- Help documentation covering recording, channels, video replies, the AI notetaker, calendar connection, and integrations.
- Community
- Founder-led content presence around async work and Zoom fatigue; no large standalone user forum.
Company
- Founded
- 2018
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, California, United States
- Ownership
- Venture-backed, private
- Founders
- Tom Medema
- Employees
- Small team, not disclosed
- Funding
- $8.5M raised in a round led by Khosla Ventures with Craft Ventures, Streamlined Ventures, 468 Ventures, and Bain Capital participating, plus angels including Naval Ravikant and Jeff Morris Jr.
Funding history
| Round | Amount | Year | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seed and Series A | $8.5M | 2022 | Led by Khosla Ventures with Craft Ventures, Streamlined Ventures, 468 Ventures, and Bain Capital; angel participation from Naval Ravikant, Jeff Morris Jr, and Brianne Kimmel. |
Timeline
- 2018Founded in San Francisco by Tom Medema, a former CTO, out of the frustration of running distributed engineering teams across time zones.
- 2020Launches the core mechanic of tagging anything on screen and discussing it in context, positioning against synchronous meeting overload.
- 2022Raises $8.5M led by Khosla Ventures with Craft Ventures and Bain Capital participating, and pitches async video messaging as the answer to Zoom fatigue.
- 2023Expands into meeting recording with an AI notetaker that joins calendar meetings, transcribes them, and produces summaries and action items.
- 2025Adds ChatGPT and Claude connectors so meeting and recording context is queryable from external AI assistants.
- 2026Prices Pro Teams at $12 per member per month billed yearly and keeps a free tier with unlimited 30-minute screen recordings and five AI-notetaken meetings a week.
Integrations
- Google Meet
- Zoom
- Google Calendar
- Outlook
- Slack
- ChatGPT connector
- Claude connector
- 200-plus integrations via Zapier
Frequently asked questions
10 questionsWhat is Bubbles?
Bubbles is an async video collaboration tool. You record your screen or camera, the recording lands in a channel, and teammates respond with threaded video replies and comments anchored to a specific moment on screen. It also includes an AI notetaker that joins your calendar meetings to record, transcribe, and summarize them. It runs as a Chrome extension and a desktop app.
How much does Bubbles cost?
The free Basic plan is $0. Pro Teams is $12 per member per month billed yearly or $15 monthly, for teams of three or more. Pro Personal is $18 yearly or $22 monthly for one or two people, and converts automatically to Pro Teams pricing once a third member joins. Pro plans include a 14-day free trial and pro-rata credits when changing tiers.
What does the free plan actually allow?
Unlimited screen recordings at up to 30 minutes each, five meeting recordings per week, AI summaries, a notetaker that joins all your meetings, and two channels. The binding constraint is that recordings lock after two weeks, so it works as a live working surface and not as an archive. It is still the most usable free tier in this category for real day-to-day work.
How is Bubbles different from Loom?
The reply. In Loom you record, send a link, and the response arrives somewhere else as an email or a Slack message. In Bubbles the response is another video threaded under the first, in a channel where the whole exchange lives together, with comments anchored to specific moments on screen. Loom is the better recorder with far better embedding; Bubbles is the better conversation.
Can Bubbles be used for sales prospecting?
No, and it does not try. There is no dynamic personalization, no per-prospect landing page, no CRM writeback, no animated GIF thumbnail, and no view-triggered follow-up automation. Everything in Bubbles is built for people who already work together. For prospect-facing video look at Vidyard, Sendspark, Potion, Hippo Video, or Dubb.
How does the AI notetaker work?
It joins meetings from your Google Calendar or Outlook, records and transcribes them, and produces a summary and action items delivered by email and written into the calendar event. Google Meet and Zoom are natively supported. On the free plan it joins all meetings and you get five recordings a week; Pro makes meetings unlimited, adds full transcripts, and lets you control which meetings it joins and who receives the recording.
Does a bot appear in my meetings?
Yes. The notetaker is a participant that joins the call, which is visible to everyone in the room. On the free plan it joins every meeting by default, and choosing which meetings it attends is a Pro feature. If your organization or your clients object to recording bots, this is a real consideration, and a bot-free notetaker in a different category would suit you better.
Do Bubbles recordings expire?
On the free Basic plan, recordings lock after two weeks. They are not deleted, but you lose access without upgrading. Pro plans have no such lock and add unlimited recording length and unlimited meetings. This is an honest free-tier design: generous while you are actively working, and not a permanent library.
What integrations does Bubbles have?
Native Google Meet and Zoom support, Google Calendar and Outlook for the notetaker, Slack, ChatGPT and Claude connectors so external assistants can read your recordings and notes, and more than 200 integrations through Zapier. There is no general-purpose public API published on the self-serve tiers, and embedding coverage is far narrower than Loom's.
Who owns Bubbles and how stable is it?
Bubbles is a private venture-backed company founded in 2018 in San Francisco by Tom Medema, a former CTO. It has raised $8.5M led by Khosla Ventures with Craft Ventures, Streamlined Ventures, 468 Ventures, and Bain Capital participating, plus angels including Naval Ravikant and Jeff Morris Jr. It is a small company, so vendor risk is higher than with Atlassian-owned Loom.
Editorial verdict
Bubbles is the best value in async video for a team that talks to itself, and the threading is the reason. When the reply to a recording is another recording in the same channel, async video stops being a broadcast and starts actually replacing meetings, which is the thing every tool in this category claims and few structurally support. At $12 per member per month billed yearly you also get an AI notetaker with transcripts and summaries, which is a second product most teams would otherwise buy separately, and the free tier with unlimited 30-minute screen recordings is the most usable one here. Two caveats. Free recordings lock after two weeks, so the archive is not free, and the notetaker is a bot that shows up in your calls whether or not everyone is comfortable with that. And understand what you are not buying: Bubbles does nothing for sales, has no CRM writeback, and embeds in far fewer places than Loom. For a distributed team of three to thirty that wants fewer calls, it is the first thing to try.
Written by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Awards, when shown, are judged against the published criteria in our methodology.