Cornersight vs PredictLeads
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
Still shortlisting? Browse the best in Buying Signals & Intent for every option we track, with award winners called out.
The short answer
Both sides assessedCornersight compared with PredictLeads
PredictLeads sells company-level facts, job openings, technologies, funding and news, through an API from a $40 monthly minimum. Cornersight sells person-level engagement from LinkedIn. PredictLeads tells you a company is doing something; Cornersight tells you which people there are paying attention. A technical team often runs both and joins them on the company domain.
PredictLeads compared with Cornersight
Cornersight captures person-level LinkedIn engagement and delivers enriched leads by webhook, API, MCP or a HeyReach push from $99 a month. PredictLeads crawls company websites, news, and filings for company-level facts and delivers them through an API for $40 a month plus usage. The signal types barely overlap: Cornersight tells you which people are paying attention, PredictLeads tells you a company is doing something. A technical team frequently runs both.
Choose Cornersight if
Outbound teams and GTM agencies selling into markets where buyers are active on LinkedIn, who want a steady list of people engaging with competitors, industry voices or relevant topics delivered into their own sequencer or CRM, and technical operators who want those leads available to scripts or AI agents through an API or MCP.
Choose PredictLeads if
Technical go-to-market teams and developers building their own signal engine, Clay users who want dated source-linked signals inside their tables, and product teams embedding company intelligence into their own application, all of whom want data rather than another dashboard.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Cornersight | PredictLeads |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Signals | Signals |
| Starting price | $99 per month (Starter, 15,000 credits) (free trial) | $0 for the first 100 API calls per month, then a $40 monthly minimum |
| Pricing model | Self-serve monthly plans metered in credits, where one credit is one unique person per monitor, with a free trial on every plan and spend caps per source, per search, per team and for the Engagement Agent. | Self-serve pay as you go metered by API call, with volume-tiered per-credit rates and a monthly minimum, plus a quoted Enterprise flat-file plan. |
| Free plan | No | Up to 100 free API calls per month, self-serve, with no card required to start building against the API. |
| Free trial | Free trial on every plan; length not published. Trial teams get up to 2 keyword searches of 250 leads each and 1,000 Agent checks | A free tier rather than a time-limited trial, available at sign-up |
| Best for | Outbound teams and GTM agencies selling into markets where buyers are active on LinkedIn, who want a steady list of people engaging with competitors, industry voices or relevant topics delivered into their own sequencer or CRM, and technical operators who want those leads available to scripts or AI agents through an API or MCP. | Technical go-to-market teams and developers building their own signal engine, Clay users who want dated source-linked signals inside their tables, and product teams embedding company intelligence into their own application, all of whom want data rather than another dashboard. |
| Setup time | Minutes to the first source: sign in with Google, paste a LinkedIn profile, company page or post URL, or enter keywords, and leads appear progressively during the first sync. Tuning ICP filters and caps takes a few days of watching what comes in. | An hour to a first API response, since the free tier requires no card and the endpoints are conventional REST. Getting to a production motion where signals create tasks is a genuine engineering project of one to three weeks, or an afternoon if you are consuming it inside Clay. |
| Learning curve | Low. Most of the value comes from choosing sources whose audience matches your ICP, and the Engagement Agent can set those up from a list of topics. | Low for a developer and high for everyone else. The API is straightforward and the documentation covers the datasets clearly, but the hard part is not technical: deciding which combinations of signals actually mean something for your business is judgement work that the product deliberately leaves to you. |
| Platforms | Web application, REST API, MCP server, Command line interface | REST API, Real-time webhooks, Flat files via AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, and SFTP, MCP endpoint for AI agents |
| Compliance | GDPR obligations apply to enriched personal data, No publicly advertised SOC 2 attestation | Data is sourced from public company web pages, news, and filings rather than personal data brokers, European operating base subject to GDPR |
| Founded | 2026 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Ljubljana, Slovenia |
| Ownership | Bootstrapped | Venture-backed, lightly funded |
Strengths and limitations
Cornersight
Strengths
- Engagement-based lists reach people who are active on LinkedIn right now, which a filter on recent posters misses because most users react far more than they post.
- No LinkedIn account connection, so there is no session to hand over and no restriction risk on the buyer's own profile.
- A credit model tied to unique people per source, with free fetching and free failed lookups, keeps the bill tied to prospects rather than activity.
- Daily re-syncs capture engagement that arrives days after a post goes live, not just a snapshot at the moment of tracking.
Limitations
- LinkedIn only; buyers who are quiet there, or active elsewhere, produce no signal.
- No job-change, funding, hiring or website-visitor signals, so it covers one slice of the intent landscape.
- Launched in January 2026 and rebuilt in May, so the track record is months long and the product is still changing quickly.
- No published SOC 2, SSO or data-residency options, which rules it out for formal enterprise procurement.
PredictLeads
Strengths
- Every record carries a primary source URL, which is the single most useful quality property in signal data and something most vendors cannot offer.
- Published crawl cadences rather than vague freshness claims: news as often as every eight minutes, job data at least every 36 hours, company sites daily on average.
- Coverage genuinely at scale, including 120 million companies, 270 million historical job records since 2016, and 1.4 billion technology detections.
- Data is crawled first-party rather than licensed from brokers, so errors are fixable at source and the provenance chain is short.
Limitations
- There is no application. No dashboard, no alerts, no inbox, and nothing that tells a salesperson what to do this morning without you building it.
- Company-level only. Nothing about individual people, so champion job changes and person-level intent are outside the product entirely.
- No first-party signals at all: PredictLeads cannot see your website traffic, your product usage, or your email engagement.
- No scoring or prioritisation. Deciding that a funding round plus five engineering hires means an account is in market is logic you write and maintain.
Pricing compared
Cornersight
Self-serve monthly plans metered in credits, where one credit is one unique person per monitor, with a free trial on every plan and spend caps per source, per search, per team and for the Engagement Agent.
- Starter$99
- Growth$169
- Pro$329
- Scale$599
Cornersight is good value for a team whose buyers live on LinkedIn. $99 a month buys 15,000 unique, enriched engagers, with every delivery route included on every plan, and the per-person credit definition means heavy repeat engagement does not inflate the bill. Against a manual workflow of exporting post engagers and enriching them separately, it pays for itself in hours saved within the first week. The limits are scope and maturity rather than price: one network, no company-level events, and a product less than a year old.
PredictLeads
Self-serve pay as you go metered by API call, with volume-tiered per-credit rates and a monthly minimum, plus a quoted Enterprise flat-file plan.
- Free$0
- Pay as you go, 101 to 5,000 calls$40 minimum plus $0.04 per credit
- Pay as you go, 5,001 to 100,000 calls$0.02 falling to $0.01 per credit
- Pay as you go, above 100,000 calls$0.004 falling to $0.002 per credit
- EnterpriseCustom
For a team that can write code or drive a Clay table, PredictLeads is the cheapest credible signal data on the market by a wide margin. A hundred free calls a month to prototype, a $40 floor to go live, and per-call rates that fall to fractions of a cent at scale, against a category where packaged platforms start at thousands of dollars a month for signals they source from providers like this one. The value collapses entirely if you cannot build: there is no interface, no alerting, and no scoring, so a non-technical buyer will spend $40 and get nothing. Judged as a data purchase rather than a software purchase, the coverage numbers, the published crawl cadences, and the source URL on every record make this unusually good value.
Editorial verdict on each
Cornersight
Best ValueCornersight is the tool to buy if your buyers are active on LinkedIn and you want the people engaging with your competitors, your category voices or your own content as enriched leads every morning. It does one signal thoroughly, re-syncs daily so late engagement is not lost, charges per unique person rather than per interaction, never touches your LinkedIn account, and delivers into HeyReach, a CRM or an AI agent on every plan from $99 a month. Its limits are clear: one network, no company-level events, and a product less than a year old with no compliance paperwork. With Trigify closing, it is the most direct replacement in this category for a LinkedIn engagement motion, and the free trial makes testing it on a handful of competitor profiles a low-risk afternoon.
Read the full Cornersight profilePredictLeads
PredictLeads is what you buy when you have decided to build the signal engine yourself. The coverage is real, the crawl cadences are published rather than implied, and the primary source URL on every record is a quality property almost nobody else in this category offers. Pricing starts free, floors at $40 a month, and falls to fractions of a cent per call, which makes it dramatically cheaper than any packaged platform running on comparable data. The catch is unambiguous and you should not talk yourself past it: there is no dashboard, no alert, and no scoring, so the value only exists if you or your Clay table can turn API responses into something a person acts on. Technical go-to-market teams should treat this as a default component of their stack. Everyone else should buy a tool with an interface and let it worry about where the data came from.
Read the full PredictLeads profileCornersight profile last reviewed 2026-10-11; PredictLeads last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.
The best in Buying Signals & Intent
18 trackedBuying signal platforms watch public and first-party events, job changes, hiring, funding, technology adoption, community activity, and product usage, then surface the accounts that just became worth contacting.
The funding round is the buying signal, and Crunchbase is where it gets recorded first.
Starter at $99 a month captures and enriches 15,000 LinkedIn engagers, charged once per person per source, with HeyReach, webhook, API and MCP delivery on every plan.
Signal fires, agent researches, sequence sends: Unify collapsed the intent stack into one product and grew like it.
Write the signal in plain English and get the answer every morning with the quote attached, turning monitoring into a language interface.
Follow your accounts, pick from 25 alert categories, and the first digest arrives next morning; Owler has no query language and nothing to configure.
Frequently asked questions
6 questionsWhat is the difference between Cornersight and PredictLeads?
PredictLeads sells company-level facts, job openings, technologies, funding and news, through an API from a $40 monthly minimum. Cornersight sells person-level engagement from LinkedIn. PredictLeads tells you a company is doing something; Cornersight tells you which people there are paying attention. A technical team often runs both and joins them on the company domain.
Is Cornersight or PredictLeads cheaper?
Cornersight starts at $99 per month (Starter, 15,000 credits) (free trial). PredictLeads starts at $0 for the first 100 API calls per month, then a $40 monthly minimum. The billing models differ, so the entry price is rarely the whole cost. Cornersight pricing model: Self-serve monthly plans metered in credits, where one credit is one unique person per monitor, with a free trial on every plan and spend caps per source, per search, per team and for the Engagement Agent. PredictLeads pricing model: Self-serve pay as you go metered by API call, with volume-tiered per-credit rates and a monthly minimum, plus a quoted Enterprise flat-file plan.
Does Cornersight or PredictLeads have a free plan?
Cornersight has no free plan. Trial terms: Free trial on every plan; length not published. Trial teams get up to 2 keyword searches of 250 leads each and 1,000 Agent checks. PredictLeads has a free plan. Up to 100 free API calls per month, self-serve, with no card required to start building against the API. Trial terms: A free tier rather than a time-limited trial, available at sign-up.
Who should choose Cornersight?
Outbound teams and GTM agencies selling into markets where buyers are active on LinkedIn, who want a steady list of people engaging with competitors, industry voices or relevant topics delivered into their own sequencer or CRM, and technical operators who want those leads available to scripts or AI agents through an API or MCP.
Who should choose PredictLeads?
Technical go-to-market teams and developers building their own signal engine, Clay users who want dated source-linked signals inside their tables, and product teams embedding company intelligence into their own application, all of whom want data rather than another dashboard.
What are the best alternatives to Cornersight and PredictLeads?
SaaSTracker profiles 18 products in Buying Signals & Intent. The Summer 2026 awards in the category went to Crunchbase (Category Leader), Unify (Momentum), WhiteWhale (Innovation). Every profile is compiled from primary sources, so a shortlist can be built from pricing, limitations, and fit rather than from star ratings.
