Olark vs tawk.to
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
Still shortlisting? Browse the best in Customer Support Platforms for every option we track, with award winners called out.
The short answer
Both sides assessedOlark compared with tawk.to
tawk.to gives the human chat software away free with unlimited agents and sells AI Assist from $29 a month on a credit balance, which makes it the obvious choice when budget is the constraint. Olark charges $29 per agent for human chat and $400 a month for an AI agent with unlimited conversations, and gives you a stronger lead-qualification agent, proactive campaign triggers and a long-established independent vendor. If cost is the decision, tawk.to; if the chat box is a sales channel worth paying for, Olark.
tawk.to compared with Olark
Olark is what you pay for when the chat box is a sales channel rather than a cost to minimise: $29 per agent for human chat and $400 a month for an AI website agent with unlimited conversations, stronger lead qualification, campaign-aware proactive triggers and an MCP server. tawk.to gives the human software away and starts AI at $29 on credits, which no paid product beats on cost. Choose tawk.to when budget decides; choose Olark when qualified leads do.
Choose Olark if
Small and mid-sized sales-led businesses, service firms and universities whose website chat is mainly about answering pre-sale questions and qualifying leads, who want an AI agent with a fixed annual price instead of a per-resolution meter, or who simply want a reliable human chat box at $29 an agent.
Choose tawk.to if
Solo founders, freelancers, agencies, small ecommerce stores, and any business that needs live chat and basic ticketing on a website and cannot justify a per-seat subscription. It is also the right answer for teams with many part-time or rotating agents, because unlimited free seats make the usual per-agent maths irrelevant.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Olark | tawk.to |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Support | Support |
| Starting price | $29 per agent per month for human live chat; $400 a month billed annually for the AI Website Agent with one seat (14 days trial) | $0 (unlimited agents, unlimited chats, permanently) |
| Pricing model | Two published products. Human-only live chat is priced per agent per month. The Standard AI Website Agent is a flat annual subscription covering unlimited AI conversations and one human seat, with additional human seats per agent per month. Custom packages for volume, multiple teams, SSO and legal review are quoted. | Free core product with unlimited agents and unlimited conversations, monetised through optional add-ons: branding removal, credit-metered AI, and hourly outsourced human agents. There is no per-seat charge at any level. |
| Free plan | No | Live chat, ticketing, knowledge base with custom domain, contacts CRM, messaging channels, triggers, departments, shortcuts, desktop and mobile apps, and 27 languages, with unlimited agents and unlimited conversations. The only restriction is the tawk.to badge on the widget. |
| Free trial | 14 days on Live Chat, and a free trial of the AI agent on your own site, both without a credit card | Not applicable; the full product is free with no time limit and no credit card |
| Best for | Small and mid-sized sales-led businesses, service firms and universities whose website chat is mainly about answering pre-sale questions and qualifying leads, who want an AI agent with a fixed annual price instead of a per-resolution meter, or who simply want a reliable human chat box at $29 an agent. | Solo founders, freelancers, agencies, small ecommerce stores, and any business that needs live chat and basic ticketing on a website and cannot justify a per-seat subscription. It is also the right answer for teams with many part-time or rotating agents, because unlimited free seats make the usual per-agent maths irrelevant. |
| Setup time | The chat box installs in minutes by script tag or CMS plugin. The AI agent trains on the site in about a minute; writing good qualification instructions and testing a draft takes an afternoon to a few days. | Under thirty minutes to a live widget: create a property, paste a snippet or install the WordPress or Shopify plugin, set your greeting and business hours, and you are taking chats. A knowledge base with a custom domain and a set of shortcuts is another afternoon. |
| Learning curve | Low. The human console is simple and has been refined for years, and the agent is configured in plain English rather than with logic trees. | Low for agents, moderate for administrators. The agent view is obvious. The admin area is dense and unfashionably organised, and finding a particular setting is often the hardest part of using tawk.to. |
| Platforms | Web application, Chat box via script tag, Plugins for WordPress, Shopify, BigCommerce, WooCommerce, Squarespace, Webflow, Drupal and Magento | Web dashboard, Windows and macOS desktop apps, iOS and Android apps, JavaScript widget for any website |
| Compliance | GDPR tooling and a Data Processing Agreement, WCAG 2.1 AA certified chat box (Classic), third-party tested, Certified B Corp, No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 attestation listed on the vendor's own pages at the time of review | GDPR, CCPA |
| Founded | 2009 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States | Las Vegas, Nevada, United States |
| Ownership | Bootstrapped and independent; a certified B Corp | Privately held and bootstrapped |
Strengths and limitations
Olark
Strengths
- Flat, unlimited AI pricing: $400 a month with no token limits, no resolution charges and no overages, which no major competitor in this category matches.
- The agent reads your live website before answering, so it quotes current prices, hours and policies rather than stale training data.
- Same-thread handoff from AI to a human, with availability checks and an out-of-hours fallback, is the part most DIY chatbots get wrong.
- Seventeen years of operating history as a bootstrapped, B Corp certified company, which is low vendor risk for a chat tool.
Limitations
- It is website chat, not a help desk: no shared email inbox, SLA engine or knowledge base product, so it usually sits beside a help desk rather than replacing one.
- The AI entry price is $400 a month on an annual contract, which is too much for a low-traffic site.
- WhatsApp, SMS, chat ratings and the WCAG-certified chat box are listed against Olark Classic, so check which features apply to the AI product you are buying.
- No security certifications are listed on the vendor's own pages; the security page is a responsible-disclosure policy.
tawk.to
Strengths
- Unlimited agents and unlimited conversations at no cost, permanently, with no contact cap and no conversation meter, which removes the pricing question entirely for small teams.
- The free tier includes things competitors charge for: a knowledge base on a custom domain, WhatsApp and Messenger channels, triggers, departments, a contacts CRM, and desktop and mobile apps.
- AI is credit-metered with a perpetual free allowance rather than charged per resolution, so you can measure your real deflection rate before committing any budget.
- The Hired Agents service at $1 an hour is a genuinely differentiated offer: nobody else in this category will simply staff your chat widget for you at that price.
Limitations
- The ticketing and email side is the weakest part of the product; if most of your support arrives by email rather than chat, this is the wrong tool and Help Scout or Zoho Desk is the right one.
- Reporting is thin: there is no meaningful SLA attainment reporting, and nothing you could put in front of an enterprise customer during procurement.
- The interface is dense and dated, with a settings structure that has not been meaningfully rethought in years.
- The free widget advertises tawk.to on your site until you pay $29 a month per property, which is the deliberate mechanism of the business model rather than an oversight.
Pricing compared
Olark
Two published products. Human-only live chat is priced per agent per month. The Standard AI Website Agent is a flat annual subscription covering unlimited AI conversations and one human seat, with additional human seats per agent per month. Custom packages for volume, multiple teams, SSO and legal review are quoted.
- Live Chat$29
- Standard AI Website Agent$400
- CustomCustom
Olark is priced for a specific buyer and is excellent value for that buyer. A sales-led business with steady website traffic and a small team gets an AI agent with unlimited conversations for $400 a month, which beats per-outcome pricing comfortably once the agent handles more than about 400 conversations a month, and it never punishes a busy month. The human product at $29 an agent is fairly priced against LiveChat's $19 to $79 and Tidio's conversation bundles, and more honest than either about what you will pay. Where the value breaks down is at the extremes: a site with little traffic pays $4,800 a year for a handful of AI conversations, and a support team that needs email ticketing, SLAs or a knowledge base is buying the wrong category of product.
tawk.to
Free core product with unlimited agents and unlimited conversations, monetised through optional add-ons: branding removal, credit-metered AI, and hourly outsourced human agents. There is no per-seat charge at any level.
- Free$0
- Remove Branding$29
- AI AssistFrom $29
- Hired Agents$1
Model the same four-agent team used elsewhere in this category. At 500 tickets a month, tawk.to costs $29 for branding removal plus roughly $29 for AI Assist, so about $58. At 2,000 tickets a month it costs the same $58 plus whatever additional AI credits the extra volume consumes, because seats and conversations are free and only AI usage scales. The comparable four-agent bills are roughly $1,106 on Intercom and roughly $1,420 on Zendesk once AI resolutions are counted, and $92 on Zoho Desk Professional. Nothing else in this directory is within an order of magnitude. The honest caveat is that you are comparing unequal products: tawk.to has no serious SLA engine, thin reporting, weak email handling, and no compliance story, so a business that needs those things is not really choosing between tawk.to and Zendesk at all. But for chat-led support on a website, the capability you get for zero dollars is not merely good value, it is a category anomaly.
Editorial verdict on each
Olark
Olark has done the one thing the rest of this category will not: it put a price on its AI agent that does not move with usage. For a sales-led business with steady website traffic, $400 a month for unlimited AI conversations, live-site answers, lead qualification and a clean handoff to a human is better value than any per-resolution model once volume passes a few hundred conversations a month, and it comes from a bootstrapped, B Corp vendor that has been doing this since 2009. The human product at $29 an agent remains a solid, simple chat box. Be clear about the edges: this is website chat, not a help desk, the AI entry price is an annual commitment that a small site will not earn back, and several channels and the certified-accessible chat box belong to the Classic product. Buy Olark if your chat is a sales channel; pair it with a help desk, or choose one instead, if your chat is a support queue.
Read the full Olark profiletawk.to
Best Valuetawk.to is the most generous free product in business software and the only sensible starting point for a company that cannot yet justify a support subscription. Unlimited agents, unlimited conversations, a knowledge base on your own domain, WhatsApp and Messenger channels, visitor monitoring, and credit-metered AI with a free allowance, for nothing, funded by a profitable thirteen-year-old company that sells outsourced chat labour at a dollar an hour. It is also unmistakably free software: the email side is weak, reporting is thin, there is no SLA engine, the compliance story is slim, and nobody owes you anything if it breaks. Install it if support is chat-led and the budget is zero or close to it, keep the $29 branding removal in mind as the real price of looking professional, and understand that the day you need SLA reporting or serious email workflow you will be shopping again. That day may be years away, and until then nothing else comes close on cost.
Read the full tawk.to profileOlark profile last reviewed 2026-10-01; tawk.to last reviewed 2026-10-01. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.
The best in Customer Support Platforms
27 trackedCustomer support platforms consolidate email, live chat, and help-center content into shared inboxes and ticket queues, so a small team can answer customers without dropping conversations.
The shared inbox that never makes customers feel like ticket numbers, matured into the small-business support standard.
A complete help desk with unlimited agents for nothing, permanently, funded by services rather than seats.
A $15M Series A in February 2025 and a customer list spanning Vercel, Cursor, and Raycast mark Plain as the breakout support desk for developer tools.
Fin answered the pricing question AI support created: 99 cents per resolved conversation, with humans only where the agent fails.
Hiver deploys in under an hour with no new interface to roll out, and agents work inside Gmail so the learning curve is close to zero.
Frequently asked questions
6 questionsWhat is the difference between Olark and tawk.to?
tawk.to gives the human chat software away free with unlimited agents and sells AI Assist from $29 a month on a credit balance, which makes it the obvious choice when budget is the constraint. Olark charges $29 per agent for human chat and $400 a month for an AI agent with unlimited conversations, and gives you a stronger lead-qualification agent, proactive campaign triggers and a long-established independent vendor. If cost is the decision, tawk.to; if the chat box is a sales channel worth paying for, Olark.
Is Olark or tawk.to cheaper?
Olark starts at $29 per agent per month for human live chat; $400 a month billed annually for the AI Website Agent with one seat (14 days trial). tawk.to starts at $0 (unlimited agents, unlimited chats, permanently). The billing models differ, so the entry price is rarely the whole cost. Olark pricing model: Two published products. Human-only live chat is priced per agent per month. tawk.to pricing model: Free core product with unlimited agents and unlimited conversations, monetised through optional add-ons: branding removal, credit-metered AI, and hourly outsourced human agents. There is no per-seat charge at any level.
Does Olark or tawk.to have a free plan?
Olark has no free plan. Trial terms: 14 days on Live Chat, and a free trial of the AI agent on your own site, both without a credit card. tawk.to has a free plan. Live chat, ticketing, knowledge base with custom domain, contacts CRM, messaging channels, triggers, departments, shortcuts, desktop and mobile apps, and 27 languages, with unlimited agents and unlimited conversations. Trial terms: Not applicable; the full product is free with no time limit and no credit card.
Who should choose Olark?
Small and mid-sized sales-led businesses, service firms and universities whose website chat is mainly about answering pre-sale questions and qualifying leads, who want an AI agent with a fixed annual price instead of a per-resolution meter, or who simply want a reliable human chat box at $29 an agent.
Who should choose tawk.to?
Solo founders, freelancers, agencies, small ecommerce stores, and any business that needs live chat and basic ticketing on a website and cannot justify a per-seat subscription. It is also the right answer for teams with many part-time or rotating agents, because unlimited free seats make the usual per-agent maths irrelevant.
What are the best alternatives to Olark and tawk.to?
SaaSTracker profiles 27 products in Customer Support Platforms. The Summer 2026 awards in the category went to Help Scout (Category Leader), Plain (Momentum), Intercom (Innovation). Every profile is compiled from primary sources, so a shortlist can be built from pricing, limitations, and fit rather than from star ratings.
