Boast
A form builder that happens to collect video, run by nine people in Michigan
Boast is a video testimonial and customer feedback platform that collects video, photo, and written responses through a multi-page form builder with conditional logic, runs NPS, CSAT, and CES surveys, automates the ask through email and SMS drip sequences, embeds the results as card, list, carousel, or floating widgets, and routes positive respondents toward a Google or Facebook review; plans run from $59 to $249 a month with a 14-day free trial.
Overview
Boast comes at video testimonials from an unusual direction. Most tools in this space start with the video, build a recording page around it, and add a library and some embeds. Boast starts with a form. Its core object is a multi-page form with conditional logic, where a video field is one field type among several, sitting alongside photo upload, text, ratings, and survey scales. That sounds like a downgrade until you see what it enables: a single flow can ask for a rating, branch based on the answer, ask a happy customer for a video and an unhappy one for private feedback, and push the happy one onward to leave a Google review.
That branching is the product's real differentiator and it is the thing most testimonial tools do badly or not at all. Sentiment-based routing means your public collection flow does not send a frustrated customer to a public review page, and your private feedback loop does not waste a delighted customer's goodwill on an internal form nobody reads.
The company is small and old, in a good way. Boast was founded in 2013 by Ryan Doom, Kevin Southworth, and Matt Hall, is run by a team of about nine near Lansing, Michigan, and has taken no outside funding in thirteen years. It is a going concern rather than a startup, which is a meaningfully different risk profile from a venture-backed tool three funding rounds into a repositioning. What you do not get from a nine-person company is compliance paperwork, SSO, or a procurement relationship.
Pricing is response-metered and starts higher than most of this category. Basic is $59 a month for 50 responses, Team is $119 for 150, Premium is $249 for 500, with annual billing saving two months and converting the meter to an annual pool. Video quality and length scale with the tier: 720p and five minutes on Basic, 1080p and ten minutes on Team, 4K and fifteen minutes on Premium. There is a 14-day trial with no card required and no refunds after that, which the vendor states plainly.
Best for
Small and mid-sized service businesses, multi-location operators, and B2B teams that want video testimonials collected through a structured flow with sentiment branching, NPS and CSAT surveys in the same tool, and SMS as a first-class channel.
Not the right fit for
- Anyone on a tight budget; $59 for 50 responses a month is the most expensive entry point per testimonial in this category, where Senja starts free and Famewall is $12.
- Teams that need high-production video output; there is no teleprompter, no AI editing pipeline, and no branded video assembly, so Vocal Video is a different class of tool for that job.
- Creators and indie founders wanting to recycle testimonials into social content; Senja's reels, image cards, and case study generation have no equivalent here.
- Ecommerce stores wanting product-level reviews and star ratings on SKUs; there is no product review model, so Judge.me or Loox is the right shape at a fifth of the price.
- Buyers who need SSO, SOC 2, or a security questionnaire answered; this is a nine-person bootstrapped company and will not have documentation to send you.
How it works
- 1
You build a form. The form builder is multi-page with conditional logic, so questions can branch on previous answers. A typical flow opens with a rating, splits on the score, and asks high scorers for a video testimonial while routing low scorers into a private feedback path that never reaches a public surface.
- 2
You automate the ask. Email and SMS drip sequences send the initial request and automated reminders, with recurring requests at set intervals and automatic enrolment triggered by customer criteria, so the ask fires from your contact database rather than from someone remembering to send it.
- 3
The customer responds in the browser. Video and photo fields capture directly on phone or desktop with nothing to install, no app, and no account creation. Responses land in a central Responses area alongside a Contacts module that functions as a customer database with import and export.
- 4
You publish and route. Approved responses embed as card, list, carousel, or floating widgets, filterable by tag, location, or staff member, which matters for multi-location businesses where a prospect wants proof from their branch rather than head office. Positive submissions can trigger a Google review request or auto-publish a testimonial to your Facebook page, and Zapier connects the rest of the workflow through more than 1,500 integrations.
Feature breakdown
29 features in 5 modulesThe form builder
The core object, and the reason Boast behaves differently from every other video testimonial tool.- Multi-page forms
- Questions can be segmented across pages rather than dumped on one screen, which raises completion on anything longer than a rating and a comment.
- Conditional logic
- Different questions display based on previous answers, most usefully on rating sentiment, so a happy customer and an unhappy one take different paths through the same form.
- Video and photo collection fields
- Video is a field type within the form rather than the entire product, which means you can collect a rating, a written quote, a photo, and a video in one flow.
- Form allowances by tier
- Five forms on Basic, 20 on Team, 50 on Premium, which is enough for per-service or per-location flows on the middle tier.
- Staff and location tagging
- Responses can be attributed to a staff member or location, and displayed filtered accordingly. Basic covers one location, Team five, Premium 20.
- Custom branding on forms
- Forms carry your identity rather than the vendor's, which matters when the link goes to a client.
Video capture and hosting
Browser-based, with quality and length rationed by tier.- In-browser recording with nothing to install
- Customers record directly on a phone or desktop browser from the link. No app, no download, no account. This is the single largest determinant of whether video testimonials ever get collected.
- Video quality tiered by plan
- 720p on Basic, 1080p on Team, 4K on Premium. Paying for resolution is unusual in this category and worth noting if the clip is destined for a paid ad.
- Video length tiered by plan
- Five minutes on Basic, ten on Team, fifteen on Premium. A five-minute ceiling is ample for a testimonial and tight for a case study interview.
- Response metering rather than storage metering
- The meter is responses per month, 50 on Basic, 150 on Team, 500 on Premium, rather than gigabytes of stored video, which makes the bill predictable.
- Annual pooling of responses
- Annual billing converts the monthly meter into an annual pool, 600 on Basic, 1,800 on Team, 6,000 on Premium, which suits businesses with seasonal spikes.
- Photo collection alongside video
- Image fields in the same form, so a customer can send a photo of the finished work as well as speaking about it.
Surveys and feedback
A genuine second product bundled in, and one Senja and Famewall do not have at all.- NPS survey templates
- Built-in Net Promoter Score collection, so the same tool measures loyalty and captures the testimonial from the promoters it identifies.
- CSAT and CES templates
- Customer satisfaction and customer effort score formats alongside NPS, covering the standard measurement vocabulary.
- Sentiment-based routing
- Conditional logic on the score means detractors go into a private feedback loop and promoters go toward a public review, which is both more effective and more honest than sending everyone to the same place.
- Contacts database
- A customer record store with import and export, so requests are sent from a maintained list rather than a spreadsheet paste.
- Consolidated responses view
- Video, photo, text, and survey answers in one place rather than split across separate modules.
Automation and review routing
Email and SMS sequences that push positive feedback outward to Google.- Email drip sequences
- Automated request sequences on all plans, with reminders that recover the majority of non-responders.
- SMS sequences
- Available on Team and Premium only; Basic is email-only, which is a real limitation for consumer service audiences who ignore email entirely.
- Recurring requests
- Ask the same customer again at a set interval, which suits recurring services and annual contracts.
- Automatic enrolment
- Contacts matching defined criteria are enrolled into sequences without manual selection.
- Google review requests on positive feedback
- A high rating in the form can trigger a Google review ask, turning private satisfaction into public local search value. This is the same mechanic NiceJob is built around.
- Auto-publish to Facebook
- Approved testimonials posted to a Facebook page automatically rather than copied across by hand.
Display and integrations
Competent embeds and Zapier, without the marketing distribution layer Senja has.- Card, list, carousel, and floating widgets
- Four embed formats, mobile-friendly, dropped into any site as a script tag rather than a platform plugin.
- Filtered widget display
- Widgets can filter by tag, location, or staff member, so a multi-location business shows the right proof on the right page.
- Zapier with 1,500-plus integrations
- The main automation surface, connecting Boast to CRMs and internal systems in the absence of a large native connector list.
- Widget page-speed cost
- Video widgets are the heaviest embed type in this category because they load a player alongside the script. Keep video walls below the fold and prefer a poster-image-first widget above it.
- Social sharing of responses
- Individual responses can be shared outward rather than only embedded, though there is no reel or image card generation.
- Staff account allowances
- Five staff accounts on Basic, 20 on Team, 100 on Premium, which is generous seat provisioning for the price.
Use cases
4 documentedMulti-location service business proving itself locally
Head office has a testimonial page, but a prospect in one city does not care what a customer three states away said.
Responses are tagged by location and staff member, widgets filter accordingly, and each branch page carries proof from its own customers. The Team tier covers five locations at $119.
B2B firm that wants NPS and testimonials from one flow
The NPS survey lives in one tool, the testimonial request in another, and the promoters identified by the first are never asked by the second.
A single Boast form runs the NPS question, branches on the score, asks promoters for a video on the spot, and routes detractors into private feedback that never reaches a public page.
Home services company wanting Google reviews and video
Google reviews matter for local search, and video testimonials matter for the website, and asking twice annoys customers.
One request, one form. A high rating triggers a Google review ask and captures a video testimonial in the same flow, with SMS sequences on the Team tier reaching customers who never open email.
Agency collecting client video without production overhead
Clients agree to a testimonial then never find time for a scheduled recording session.
A form link records in the browser at whatever moment suits them, with automated reminders chasing non-responders and 1080p output on the Team tier good enough for the website.
Pricing
from $59 per month (Basic), or $50 per month billed annuallyMonthly subscription metered by responses per month, with video quality, video length, form count, staff accounts, locations, and SMS availability all scaling by tier. Annual billing converts the meter into an annual pool.
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Basic | $59 per month, or $50 billed annually |
Email-only automation is the real constraint here, not the response count. |
| Team | $119 per month, or $100 billed annually |
The tier most buyers actually need, because SMS and 1080p both matter in practice. |
| Premium | $249 per month, or $208 billed annually |
|
| Enterprise | Custom contact sales |
|
Billing notes
- Annual billing saves two months of fees and converts the monthly response meter into a larger annual pool, which suits seasonal businesses better than a strict monthly cap.
- The 14-day free trial requires no credit card, and the vendor states plainly that no refunds are offered afterwards because the trial exists.
- Upgrades, downgrades, and cancellation are available at any time with no contract.
- Video resolution is a paid feature, with 720p on Basic and 4K only at $249, which is an unusual thing to meter.
- SMS sequences are unavailable on Basic entirely, so a consumer-facing business should budget for Team at $119 from the start.
Value assessment: Boast is the most expensive entry point in this category per testimonial collected, and the case for it rests entirely on the form builder and the survey layer. At $59 for 50 responses you are paying more than Senja charges for unlimited testimonials at $29 and roughly five times Famewall's $12, and neither of those competitors meters you at all. What neither of them has is conditional logic, NPS and CSAT templates, sentiment routing, SMS sequences, or staff and location attribution. If your collection problem is genuinely a workflow problem, asking the right customers the right questions and routing them to the right destination, Boast solves something the cheaper tools do not attempt. If your problem is simply that you have twenty happy customers and no testimonials on your site, you are overpaying substantially. The Team tier at $119 is the honest recommendation, because Basic's email-only automation removes the channel that makes the ask work for consumer audiences, which means the real entry price is double the headline.
Strengths & limitations
Strengths
- Conditional logic and sentiment routing, so detractors go into private feedback and promoters go toward a public review, which almost no testimonial tool does properly.
- NPS, CSAT, and CES survey templates in the same product as testimonial collection, replacing a second subscription.
- In-browser video and photo capture with nothing for the customer to install, no app, and no account creation.
- SMS sequences on the Team tier and above, a channel most testimonial tools ignore entirely.
- Staff and location tagging with filtered widget display, which multi-location businesses need and single-brand tools cannot provide.
- Response-metered rather than storage-metered, with annual pooling, so the bill is predictable and seasonal spikes do not break the plan.
- Google review request routing on positive feedback, giving local search value from the same flow that produces the website testimonial.
- Thirteen years old, bootstrapped, nine people, no funding rounds and no repositioning history, which is a quietly reassuring risk profile.
Limitations
- The most expensive starting price in this category at $59 for 50 responses, against Senja's free tier and Famewall's $12.
- Basic has no SMS at all, which makes the real entry price $119 for most consumer-facing businesses.
- Video resolution is metered by tier, with 720p on the entry plan and 4K reserved for $249, which is an odd thing to charge for in 2026.
- No marketing distribution layer: no social image cards, no captioned reels, no case study generation, so the testimonial stays a testimonial.
- No teleprompter, AI editing, or produced-video pipeline, so it is not a substitute for Vocal Video if production quality is the goal.
- Integration surface is thin natively and leans almost entirely on Zapier.
- No SSO, no SOC 2, no published trust center; a nine-person company has nothing to send a security reviewer.
- No free plan, and no refunds after the trial, which the vendor states openly but which leaves no margin for a mistaken annual purchase.
Head-to-head comparisons
5 alternativesBoast vs Vocal Video
from $0 (free), then $99 per month billed yearly (Essential)Vocal Video is a video production platform starting around $99 a month, with teleprompters, AI editing, subtitles in over 100 languages, and ad-free hosting, built to make testimonials look produced. Boast is a form and survey platform where video is one field type, starting at $59 with 720p on the entry tier. Choose Vocal Video when the finished video is the marketing asset; choose Boast when the collection workflow, the branching, and the surveys are the actual problem.
Full Boast vs Vocal Video comparisonBoast vs Testimonial.to
from $0 (free), then $25 per month (Starter)Testimonial.to serves tens of thousands of businesses with testimonial collection, walls of love, NPS, brand monitoring, and case study interviews, at a much lower price and with a free tier. Boast is more structured, with multi-page conditional forms, CSAT and CES alongside NPS, SMS sequences, and staff and location attribution. Testimonial.to is the better default; Boast earns the premium only if you need branching logic and multi-location filtering.
Full Boast vs Testimonial.to comparisonBoast vs Senja
from $0 (free for 15 testimonials), then $29 per month (Starter)Senja costs $29 for unlimited testimonials with imports from around 30 platforms and turns each quote into social cards, captioned reels, and case study drafts. Boast starts at $59 for 50 responses and has none of that distribution layer, but has conditional forms, surveys, SMS, and Google review routing that Senja does not attempt. If you want testimonials recycled into ongoing marketing, take Senja. If you want a structured feedback workflow that also produces testimonials, take Boast.
Full Boast vs Senja comparisonBoast vs Famewall
from $0 (free), then $12 per month (Standard)Famewall is $12 a month with review schema included, a proper agency tier, and audio testimonials, aimed at getting a wall of love live cheaply. Boast is five times the price and does a fundamentally different job: forms with logic, NPS and CSAT, SMS drips, and review routing. For a small business that simply needs testimonials on a page, Famewall is the correct purchase and Boast is a large overspend.
Full Boast vs Famewall comparisonBoast vs NiceJob
from $75 per month (Reviews)Both route positive feedback toward a Google review, and both target service businesses. NiceJob at $75 does review generation more thoroughly, with monitoring, AI replies, multi-location handling, and more than a thousand field service integrations, but collects no video testimonials for your website. Boast at $59 collects the video and the survey data but does less to drive and manage the Google rating itself. A service business that wants both usually starts with whichever surface matters more: Maps or the website.
Full Boast vs NiceJob comparisonImplementation & onboarding
- Setup time
- Half a day. Build the first form, decide the branching logic on the rating question, import contacts, configure the email sequence with reminders, and place one widget. The branching design is the part that deserves real thought, because it determines whether unhappy customers ever reach a public page.
- Learning curve
- Moderate by the standards of this category, which is otherwise full of tools you can configure in ten minutes. Conditional logic, sequence enrolment criteria, and tag-based widget filtering all reward deliberate setup, and the survey layer is a separate mental model from testimonial collection.
- Onboarding
- Fully self-serve on all three published tiers with a 14-day trial and no credit card required. Enterprise adds a dedicated account manager. There is no implementation fee and no demo gate on the standard plans.
- Migration notes
- The Contacts module supports import and export, so bringing a customer list in and taking it out again is straightforward. Responses including video can be exported, so the testimonials are yours rather than trapped in a hosted profile. Widgets are script tags, so switching display vendors means swapping embed codes on each page. There is no direct importer from another testimonial tool, so existing quotes come across by hand or by CSV rather than automatically.
Platform, API & security
- Platforms
- Web applicationHosted collection formsBrowser-based video and photo capture on desktop and mobileJavaScript embed widgetsEmail and SMS delivery
- API
- Zapier is the primary automation surface, with more than 1,500 connected apps. There is no large native integration catalogue and no prominent public REST API on the published plans.
- Compliance
- GDPR-facing privacy policyNo SOC 2 or ISO 27001 published
- Data residency
- Not published.
- SSO
- Not offered.
- Security notes
- Boast is a nine-person bootstrapped company with no published trust center or certification. The data held is customer contact information plus video and photo content submitted by customers, which is more sensitive than a text testimonial because it contains identifiable faces and voices. Confirm your own consent and release process for video, since the platform records the submission but the permission to publish is your responsibility.
Support & resources
- Channels
- Email supportIn-app helpDedicated account manager on Enterprise
- Documentation
- Documentation covering the form builder, conditional logic, sequences, widgets, survey templates, and Zapier connections.
- Community
- No formal user community; support runs through the small team directly.
Company
- Founded
- 2013
- Headquarters
- Lansing, Michigan, United States
- Ownership
- Bootstrapped
- Founders
- Ryan Doom, Kevin Southworth, Matt Hall
- Employees
- Approximately 9
- Funding
- No funding rounds raised in thirteen years of operation. The company is founder-owned and run by a team of roughly nine including the three co-founders.
Timeline
- 2013Founded by Ryan Doom, Kevin Southworth, and Matt Hall after Doom's agency work surfaced the need for a simple way to collect video testimonials.
- 2017Expands from video testimonials into online reviews and customer surveys, establishing the form-first architecture that still defines the product.
- 2020Adds NPS, CSAT, and CES survey templates plus conditional logic, enabling sentiment-based routing between public testimonials and private feedback.
- 2023Adds SMS drip sequences on the higher tiers alongside email, and Google review request routing from positive form responses.
- 2026Runs four tiers from $59 to Enterprise, metered by monthly responses with video quality and length scaling by plan, still bootstrapped with roughly nine staff.
Integrations
- Zapier with more than 1,500 connected apps
- Google Business Profile review requests
- Facebook auto-publishing
- Email delivery
- SMS delivery on Team and Premium
- CSV contact import and export
- JavaScript widget embeds for any website
Frequently asked questions
10 questionsWhat is Boast?
Boast is a video testimonial and customer feedback platform built around a multi-page form builder with conditional logic. Video, photo, text, ratings, and survey scales are all field types in the same form, so one flow can measure NPS, branch on the score, collect a video from a happy customer, and route them to leave a Google review. Results embed on your site as card, list, carousel, or floating widgets.
How much does Boast cost?
Basic is $59 a month for 50 responses with 720p video up to five minutes and email sequences only. Team is $119 for 150 responses with 1080p video up to ten minutes and SMS sequences. Premium is $249 for 500 responses with 4K video up to fifteen minutes. Annual billing saves two months and pools the responses annually. There is a 14-day free trial with no card required and no refunds afterwards.
Do customers need to install anything to record a video testimonial?
No. Video and photo capture happen directly in the browser on a phone or desktop from the form link. There is no app to download, no account to create, and no meeting to join. Every step you remove from that flow measurably raises completion, which is why in-browser capture is the standard across every serious tool in this category.
What is sentiment-based routing and why does it matter?
Conditional logic lets the form branch on a rating. A high scorer is asked for a video testimonial and pushed toward a Google review; a low scorer is routed into a private feedback path that never reaches a public page. This is both more effective and more honest than sending everyone to the same destination, and it is the feature that most distinguishes Boast from cheaper testimonial widgets.
Does Boast emit Review or AggregateRating structured data?
Structured data is not a headline feature here, and Boast is not positioned on SEO the way the ecommerce review apps are. If rich snippets are your objective, Judge.me emits them free, Loox at $14.99, and Famewall at $12, all of which are cheaper than Boast's entry tier. Buy Boast for the collection workflow and the surveys, not for schema markup.
How is video stored and metered?
The meter is responses per month rather than gigabytes of storage, which makes the bill predictable: 50 responses on Basic, 150 on Team, 500 on Premium. Annual billing converts this into a yearly pool of 600, 1,800, or 6,000, which suits seasonal businesses. What does scale by tier is video quality and maximum length, from 720p and five minutes up to 4K and fifteen minutes.
Can I import my existing testimonials or reviews from other platforms?
Not automatically. Boast has a Contacts module with CSV import and export, but there is no direct importer pulling in reviews from G2, Trustpilot, Google, or social posts the way Senja and Famewall offer. Existing praise comes across by hand. If importing an existing corpus is a large part of your job, that is a real argument for a different tool.
Will the video widgets slow down my site?
Video widgets are the heaviest embed type in this category, because they load a player as well as the widget script. The mitigation is placement and format: use a poster-image-first widget or a compact carousel near the top of a page and keep a full video wall below the fold. Test on a real page rather than assuming, because the difference between a text testimonial grid and a video wall is substantial.
Who runs Boast and how stable is it?
Boast was founded in 2013 by Ryan Doom, Kevin Southworth, and Matt Hall, is based near Lansing, Michigan, and is run by a team of about nine. It has raised no outside funding in thirteen years. That means no repositioning history, no investor pressure to reprice, and direct access to the people building it, but also no SSO, no SOC 2, and no documentation to send a security reviewer.
Should I choose Boast over a cheaper testimonial tool?
Only if the workflow is the problem. Senja gives unlimited testimonials at $29 and turns them into social content; Famewall gives you a wall of love with review schema at $12. Neither has conditional logic, NPS and CSAT templates, SMS sequences, staff and location attribution, or Google review routing. If you need those, Boast is worth the premium. If you just need testimonials on a page, it is a substantial overspend and the cheaper tools do that job better.
Editorial verdict
Boast is a workflow tool wearing a testimonial tool's clothes, and it should be judged on that basis. The multi-page conditional form builder, the NPS and CSAT templates, the SMS sequences, the staff and location tagging, and the Google review routing add up to something the cheap testimonial widgets do not attempt: a structured feedback process where the right customers get the right ask and unhappy ones never reach a public page. For a multi-location service business or a B2B team that wants surveys and testimonials from one flow, that is genuinely worth paying for. The price is the problem everywhere else. At $59 for 50 responses it is the most expensive entry point in this category, and because Basic has no SMS at all the real starting price for most buyers is $119. Against Senja at $29 for unlimited or Famewall at $12 with review schema, that gap only closes if you use the branching. Thirteen years, nine people, no funding, and no repositioning is a reassuring foundation. Buy it for the logic, not for the video.
Written by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Awards, when shown, are judged against the published criteria in our methodology.