DMARCLY vs EasyDMARC
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Both sides assessedDMARCLY compared with EasyDMARC
EasyDMARC is the better-explained product with stronger vendor naming and a useful free tier, but it caps at four domains on a $71.99 plan where DMARCLY covers fifteen at $69. Take EasyDMARC if a non-technical owner is running this alone and you have one or two domains; take DMARCLY the moment your domain count passes three and you have someone technical to drive it.
EasyDMARC compared with DMARCLY
DMARCLY is the value play: $69 a month covers fifteen domains against EasyDMARC's four at $71.99, and Safe SPF handles the lookup limit the way EasySPF does. EasyDMARC has better vendor identification, a stronger free tier, and a more developed MSP program. Any buyer with more than four domains should price DMARCLY first.
Choose DMARCLY if
Companies and agencies with several domains that want published, predictable, self-serve pricing for DMARC monitoring, plus SPF lookup remediation, without a sales conversation or an enterprise contract.
Choose EasyDMARC if
Small businesses and MSPs that need to satisfy the Google and Yahoo bulk sender requirements, see who is sending as their domain, and get to an enforced p=reject policy without hiring a deliverability consultant, especially those managing one to four domains.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | DMARCLY | EasyDMARC |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Deliverability | Deliverability |
| Starting price | $17.99 per month (Professional) (14 days trial) | $0 (Free, one domain), then $35.99 per month billed annually (Plus) (free plan available) |
| Pricing model | Flat-rate subscription tiered by number of domains, monthly DMARC-compliant message volume, data history, user seats, and Safe SPF domain count. | Freemium subscription tiered by number of domains, monthly DMARC-reported email volume, and data history length, with the top tier quoted by sales. |
| Free plan | No | One domain, 1,000 DMARC-reported emails a month, fourteen days of data history, one user, basic reports and the full set of SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and BIMI lookup tools. |
| Free trial | 14 days on every paid tier | No separate trial; the free plan is the evaluation path |
| Best for | Companies and agencies with several domains that want published, predictable, self-serve pricing for DMARC monitoring, plus SPF lookup remediation, without a sales conversation or an enterprise contract. | Small businesses and MSPs that need to satisfy the Google and Yahoo bulk sender requirements, see who is sending as their domain, and get to an enforced p=reject policy without hiring a deliverability consultant, especially those managing one to four domains. |
| Setup time | Thirty minutes to add domains and publish records. Reaching a defensible p=reject takes four to eight weeks of calendar time for a typical small business, governed by how long it takes every legitimate sender to appear in a report and be fixed. | Under an hour to publish a record and start collecting, then two to eight weeks of real elapsed time before you have enough data to move to enforcement safely. The clock, not the configuration, is the constraint. |
| Learning curve | Moderate to high depending on your background. The dashboards are clear if you already understand alignment; if you do not, DMARCLY will not teach you as thoroughly as dmarcian's documentation would. | Moderate, and lower than the category average. You still have to understand the difference between SPF authentication and SPF alignment to make good decisions, but vendor identification removes most of the interpretive work that stalls first-time deployments. |
| Platforms | Web application | Web application, Public DNS lookup and record generator tools, MSP multi-tenant console |
| Compliance | GDPR | SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001 |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Not publicly disclosed | United States, with engineering roots in Yerevan, Armenia |
| Ownership | Privately held, independent | Venture-backed |
Strengths and limitations
DMARCLY
Strengths
- The clearest and cheapest published multi-domain ladder in the category, with two hundred domains available self-serve at $199 a month.
- Forensic reports included on the entry tier, where most competitors reserve them for mid or upper plans.
- Safe SPF handles the ten DNS lookup overflow, the silent failure mode most established domains suffer from without knowing.
- BIMI, MTA-STS, and TLS-RPT support on every paid tier rather than reserved for enterprise contracts.
Limitations
- Documentation and in-product guidance are competent but thin next to dmarcian or EasyDMARC; a non-technical owner will find themselves reading elsewhere.
- Safe SPF domain counts are capped separately at one, two, and four, so multi-domain buyers with widespread SPF overflow may need a higher tier than the domain count alone suggests.
- Short data history on the lower tiers, two months on Professional and four on Growth, which is not enough to diagnose quarterly sending patterns.
- No free plan at all, so evaluation is limited to the fourteen-day trial.
EasyDMARC
Strengths
- Vendor identification turns aggregate reports from an IP address puzzle into a readable list of the services sending as your domain, which is the difference between a tool a generalist can use and one they abandon.
- EasySPF solves the ten DNS lookup overflow, an extremely common silent failure that most small domains have and nobody notices.
- The free tier is a real product rather than a teaser: one domain, working reports, and the full record tooling is enough to get a first DMARC policy published.
- Clear guided path from p=none through quarantine to reject, with the pass-rate evidence needed to know when each step is safe.
Limitations
- Domain allowances are stingy relative to price: four domains on a $71.99 plan compares poorly with DMARCLY's fifteen at $69 or URIports' twenty-five at $30.
- Additional domains have no published price, which breaks the self-serve promise exactly at the moment a growing buyer needs it.
- API access and SSO are Enterprise-only, so there is no supported way to automate at a published price.
- Managed DMARC, BIMI, and MTA-STS record hosting is Enterprise-only; self-serve customers maintain their own DNS.
Pricing compared
DMARCLY
Flat-rate subscription tiered by number of domains, monthly DMARC-compliant message volume, data history, user seats, and Safe SPF domain count.
- Professional$17.99
- Growth$39.99
- Business$69
- Enterprise$199
DMARCLY has the best price-per-domain curve in self-serve DMARC monitoring, and the curve stays legible all the way up. Fifteen domains for $69 against dmarcian's $600 for the same count is not a close comparison, and two hundred domains at $199 with API access included is a figure no competitor publishes at all. What you give up is guidance: the interface and documentation assume competence rather than building it, and the Safe SPF domain caps are a real gate at the lower tiers. For a technically capable buyer with three or more domains, this is the correct default. For a single-domain business with a non-technical owner, EasyDMARC or dmarcian will produce a better outcome despite costing more per domain.
EasyDMARC
Freemium subscription tiered by number of domains, monthly DMARC-reported email volume, and data history length, with the top tier quoted by sales.
- Free$0
- Plus$35.99
- Premium$71.99
- EnterpriseCustom
For one to four domains, EasyDMARC is priced sensibly against the alternative of paying a deliverability consultant a few thousand dollars to do the same deployment once and leave no monitoring behind. Plus at $35.99 buys the two features that decide whether a generalist succeeds here, vendor identification and EasySPF, and Premium's unlimited users is worth the step up for any team where marketing and IT both need to look. The value falls off sharply above four domains, where DMARCLY and URIports offer far more domains for less money, and it falls off again if you need an API. Judged as a guided path to p=reject for a small business, it is good value; judged per domain at scale, it is expensive.
Editorial verdict on each
DMARCLY
DMARCLY is the multi-domain value pick in DMARC monitoring, and the reason is simply arithmetic: fifteen domains for $69 a month against dmarcian's $600 for the same count, and a published two-hundred-domain self-serve tier at $199 with API access that nobody else in this field advertises. Forensic reports on the entry plan, Safe SPF for the DNS lookup overflow, and BIMI and MTA-STS support across all tiers make the feature set complete rather than merely cheap. What you are not buying is education. The documentation is adequate rather than definitive, the Safe SPF domain caps are an easy trap, and the company discloses very little about itself. Buy it if you have three or more domains and someone technical to drive the deployment. If one non-technical person is doing this alone on a single domain, pay more elsewhere for the hand-holding, and in either case do not expect it to say anything about whether your mail reaches the inbox.
Read the full DMARCLY profileEasyDMARC
EasyDMARC is the DMARC platform to pick when the person running it does not want to become an email authentication expert. Vendor identification and EasySPF remove the two obstacles that most often stall a first deployment, the free tier is genuinely enough to publish a policy and start collecting evidence, and the guided ladder to p=reject is honest about how long it takes. The pricing is where it stops being obviously correct: four domains for $71.99 is poor value beside DMARCLY or URIports, extra domains have no published price, and API access is locked behind a sales conversation. Buy it for one to four domains and a non-specialist owner. Do not buy it expecting help with inbox placement or cold email reputation, because it does neither.
Read the full EasyDMARC profileDMARCLY profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; EasyDMARC last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.