DMARCLY vs Red Sift OnDMARC
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Both sides assessedDMARCLY compared with Red Sift OnDMARC
OnDMARC Express is cheaper than anything DMARCLY offers, $9 a month for four domains with hosted record services, but it stops dead there: the next Red Sift tier is quoted by sales and built for twenty-five sender domains. DMARCLY publishes the whole ladder to two hundred. Start on OnDMARC Express if you are small and staying small; choose DMARCLY if you expect to grow past four domains.
Red Sift OnDMARC compared with DMARCLY
DMARCLY publishes a complete self-serve ladder to two hundred domains, which is exactly what OnDMARC lacks above Express. OnDMARC is cheaper and more capable at four domains or fewer. Start on OnDMARC Express if you are small, and move to DMARCLY rather than into Red Sift's quote process when your domain count grows past four.
Choose DMARCLY if
Companies and agencies with several domains that want published, predictable, self-serve pricing for DMARC monitoring, plus SPF lookup remediation, without a sales conversation or an enterprise contract.
Choose Red Sift OnDMARC if
Small businesses with up to four domains that want a very cheap, capable, self-serve DMARC entry point with hosted record management, and larger organizations already buying into Red Sift's wider email security platform.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | DMARCLY | Red Sift OnDMARC |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Deliverability | Deliverability |
| Starting price | $17.99 per month (Professional) (14 days trial) | $9 per month billed annually (Express) (free trial) |
| Pricing model | Flat-rate subscription tiered by number of domains, monthly DMARC-compliant message volume, data history, user seats, and Safe SPF domain count. | Subscription tiered by active sender domains, monthly email volume, and data history, with one published self-serve entry price and three custom-quoted tiers above it. |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | 14 days on every paid tier | Free trial available with no credit card required |
| Best for | Companies and agencies with several domains that want published, predictable, self-serve pricing for DMARC monitoring, plus SPF lookup remediation, without a sales conversation or an enterprise contract. | Small businesses with up to four domains that want a very cheap, capable, self-serve DMARC entry point with hosted record management, and larger organizations already buying into Red Sift's wider email security platform. |
| Setup time | Thirty minutes to add domains and publish records. Reaching a defensible p=reject takes four to eight weeks of calendar time for a typical small business, governed by how long it takes every legitimate sender to appear in a report and be fixed. | Under an hour to add domains, publish records, and start collecting. Reaching a defensible p=reject takes four to eight weeks of calendar time, driven by how long it takes every legitimate sender to appear in a report and be fixed. Hosted records make each subsequent change a matter of minutes. |
| Learning curve | Moderate to high depending on your background. The dashboards are clear if you already understand alignment; if you do not, DMARCLY will not teach you as thoroughly as dmarcian's documentation would. | Moderate. The reporting is legible and the Investigate tool shortens diagnosis, but the delegation model and the enterprise framing both assume a slightly more technical reader than EasyDMARC does. |
| Platforms | Web application | Web application, Dynamic hosted record services, Investigate diagnostic tool |
| Compliance | GDPR | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Founded | 2018 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Not publicly disclosed | London, United Kingdom |
| Ownership | Privately held, independent | Venture-backed |
Strengths and limitations
DMARCLY
Strengths
- The clearest and cheapest published multi-domain ladder in the category, with two hundred domains available self-serve at $199 a month.
- Forensic reports included on the entry tier, where most competitors reserve them for mid or upper plans.
- Safe SPF handles the ten DNS lookup overflow, the silent failure mode most established domains suffer from without knowing.
- BIMI, MTA-STS, and TLS-RPT support on every paid tier rather than reserved for enterprise contracts.
Limitations
- Documentation and in-product guidance are competent but thin next to dmarcian or EasyDMARC; a non-technical owner will find themselves reading elsewhere.
- Safe SPF domain counts are capped separately at one, two, and four, so multi-domain buyers with widespread SPF overflow may need a higher tier than the domain count alone suggests.
- Short data history on the lower tiers, two months on Professional and four on Growth, which is not enough to diagnose quarterly sending patterns.
- No free plan at all, so evaluation is limited to the fourteen-day trial.
Red Sift OnDMARC
Strengths
- Express at $9 a month for four domains with full hosted record services is the cheapest capable published DMARC plan in the category.
- Dynamic hosted DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI on every tier, including the entry plan, where competitors reserve record hosting for enterprise contracts.
- Forensic reporting included as standard rather than gated to mid or upper tiers.
- Dynamic SPF resolves the ten DNS lookup overflow without manual flattening, a failure mode most established domains have.
Limitations
- Only one tier has a published price; Essentials, Enterprise, and Premier are all custom-quoted, so the upgrade path is a sales conversation rather than a click.
- Thirty days of data history on Express is the shortest working window among comparable plans and makes periodic sending patterns hard to diagnose.
- The jump from four domains to twenty-five is enormous, with nothing published in between, which strands a company that grows to six or eight domains.
- The product is fundamentally built for organizations with security teams, so a small business is buying an entry tier of an enterprise product rather than a product designed for it.
Pricing compared
DMARCLY
Flat-rate subscription tiered by number of domains, monthly DMARC-compliant message volume, data history, user seats, and Safe SPF domain count.
- Professional$17.99
- Growth$39.99
- Business$69
- Enterprise$199
DMARCLY has the best price-per-domain curve in self-serve DMARC monitoring, and the curve stays legible all the way up. Fifteen domains for $69 against dmarcian's $600 for the same count is not a close comparison, and two hundred domains at $199 with API access included is a figure no competitor publishes at all. What you give up is guidance: the interface and documentation assume competence rather than building it, and the Safe SPF domain caps are a real gate at the lower tiers. For a technically capable buyer with three or more domains, this is the correct default. For a single-domain business with a non-technical owner, EasyDMARC or dmarcian will produce a better outcome despite costing more per domain.
Red Sift OnDMARC
Subscription tiered by active sender domains, monthly email volume, and data history, with one published self-serve entry price and three custom-quoted tiers above it.
- ExpressFrom $9
- EssentialsCustom
- EnterpriseCustom
- PremierCustom
Express is one of the best value propositions in this entire category, and it exists because Red Sift makes its money elsewhere. Four domains, a million monthly emails, forensic reporting, and full dynamic hosted services for SPF, DKIM, DMARC, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI at $9 a month is capability that EasyDMARC charges $71.99 for and dmarcian would price at $240. The catch is the ceiling. Thirty days of history is genuinely limiting, and the moment four domains is not enough you are in a quote process aimed at organizations with twenty-five sender domains. Take Express for what it is, an exceptional entry tier, and have DMARCLY or URIports in mind as the destination if you outgrow it.
Editorial verdict on each
DMARCLY
DMARCLY is the multi-domain value pick in DMARC monitoring, and the reason is simply arithmetic: fifteen domains for $69 a month against dmarcian's $600 for the same count, and a published two-hundred-domain self-serve tier at $199 with API access that nobody else in this field advertises. Forensic reports on the entry plan, Safe SPF for the DNS lookup overflow, and BIMI and MTA-STS support across all tiers make the feature set complete rather than merely cheap. What you are not buying is education. The documentation is adequate rather than definitive, the Safe SPF domain caps are an easy trap, and the company discloses very little about itself. Buy it if you have three or more domains and someone technical to drive the deployment. If one non-technical person is doing this alone on a single domain, pay more elsewhere for the hand-holding, and in either case do not expect it to say anything about whether your mail reaches the inbox.
Read the full DMARCLY profileRed Sift OnDMARC
OnDMARC Express is the best cheap DMARC plan available, and it exists because Red Sift makes its money from enterprise contracts. Nine dollars a month for four domains, a million monthly emails, forensic reporting, and dynamic hosted services across DMARC, SPF, DKIM, MTA-STS, TLS-RPT, and BIMI is capability that EasyDMARC prices at $71.99 and dmarcian at $240, from a vendor with roughly $70M in funding behind it. Two things keep it from being the automatic choice. Thirty days of history is genuinely short, and there is nothing published between four domains and the twenty-five-domain quoted tier, so growth means a sales process rather than an upgrade button. Buy Express if you have four domains or fewer and want hosted record management at the lowest possible price, and plan to move to DMARCLY or URIports rather than up the Red Sift ladder if you outgrow it. As with every product here, it says nothing about whether your mail reaches the inbox.
Read the full Red Sift OnDMARC profileDMARCLY profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; Red Sift OnDMARC last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.