EasyDMARC vs URIports
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Both sides assessedEasyDMARC compared with URIports
URIports is the cheapest serious option in this group at $6 a month for five domains and $30 for twenty-five, and it monitors browser-side CSP and certificate health alongside DMARC. EasyDMARC is far more hand-holding for someone who does not know what DKIM alignment is. Technical operators should take URIports; non-technical owners should take EasyDMARC and pay the difference for guidance.
URIports compared with EasyDMARC
EasyDMARC costs roughly six times more for fewer domains and earns the difference through vendor naming, SPF flattening, and guided remediation aimed at people with no email background. URIports gives you accurate reports across far more domains and expects you to know what to do. Non-technical owners with one to four domains should take EasyDMARC; technical operators with more domains should take URIports.
Choose EasyDMARC if
Small businesses and MSPs that need to satisfy the Google and Yahoo bulk sender requirements, see who is sending as their domain, and get to an enforced p=reject policy without hiring a deliverability consultant, especially those managing one to four domains.
Choose URIports if
Technical operators, sysadmins, and agencies monitoring authentication across many domains on a small budget, particularly those who also own the websites and want CSP, DNS, and certificate monitoring in the same console.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | EasyDMARC | URIports |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Deliverability | Deliverability |
| Starting price | $0 (Free, one domain), then $35.99 per month billed annually (Plus) (free plan available) | $1.25 per month (Sand, personal), $6 per month billed annually (Pebble) (free trial) |
| Pricing model | Freemium subscription tiered by number of domains, monthly DMARC-reported email volume, and data history length, with the top tier quoted by sales. | Flat-rate subscription tiered by number of domains, monthly report volume, and retention length, with add-on domain packs and a personal-use plan. |
| Free plan | One domain, 1,000 DMARC-reported emails a month, fourteen days of data history, one user, basic reports and the full set of SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and BIMI lookup tools. | No |
| Free trial | No separate trial; the free plan is the evaluation path | One month, no credit card required |
| Best for | Small businesses and MSPs that need to satisfy the Google and Yahoo bulk sender requirements, see who is sending as their domain, and get to an enforced p=reject policy without hiring a deliverability consultant, especially those managing one to four domains. | Technical operators, sysadmins, and agencies monitoring authentication across many domains on a small budget, particularly those who also own the websites and want CSP, DNS, and certificate monitoring in the same console. |
| Setup time | Under an hour to publish a record and start collecting, then two to eight weeks of real elapsed time before you have enough data to move to enforcement safely. The clock, not the configuration, is the constraint. | Fifteen to thirty minutes to add domains and publish reporting records, and about the same again to point CSP and TLS-RPT at it if you want the wider coverage. Reaching p=reject still takes weeks of calendar time regardless of the tool. |
| Learning curve | Moderate, and lower than the category average. You still have to understand the difference between SPF authentication and SPF alignment to make good decisions, but vendor identification removes most of the interpretive work that stalls first-time deployments. | High relative to the guided competitors, and that is the deliberate trade for the price. URIports assumes you understand SPF alignment, DKIM selectors, and CSP directives, and will not walk you through any of them. |
| Platforms | Web application, Public DNS lookup and record generator tools, MSP multi-tenant console | Web application, Report ingestion endpoints for DMARC, TLS-RPT, CSP, and the Reporting API, Hosted MTA-STS policy endpoint |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001 | GDPR |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | United States, with engineering roots in Yerevan, Armenia | Netherlands |
| Ownership | Venture-backed | Privately held, independent |
Strengths and limitations
EasyDMARC
Strengths
- Vendor identification turns aggregate reports from an IP address puzzle into a readable list of the services sending as your domain, which is the difference between a tool a generalist can use and one they abandon.
- EasySPF solves the ten DNS lookup overflow, an extremely common silent failure that most small domains have and nobody notices.
- The free tier is a real product rather than a teaser: one domain, working reports, and the full record tooling is enough to get a first DMARC policy published.
- Clear guided path from p=none through quarantine to reject, with the pass-rate evidence needed to know when each step is safe.
Limitations
- Domain allowances are stingy relative to price: four domains on a $71.99 plan compares poorly with DMARCLY's fifteen at $69 or URIports' twenty-five at $30.
- Additional domains have no published price, which breaks the self-serve promise exactly at the moment a growing buyer needs it.
- API access and SSO are Enterprise-only, so there is no supported way to automate at a published price.
- Managed DMARC, BIMI, and MTA-STS record hosting is Enterprise-only; self-serve customers maintain their own DNS.
URIports
Strengths
- By far the cheapest published per-domain pricing in the category: five domains for $6 a month, twenty-five for $30, a hundred for $120.
- A published add-on domain price of $12 per pack of ten, where most competitors in this field refuse to quote per-domain costs at all.
- Genuine breadth: DMARC, SMTP TLS reporting, hosted MTA-STS, DANE, DNS monitoring, certificate expiry, CSP, Reporting API, and Network Error Logging in one console.
- Hosted MTA-STS policy serving removes the main practical obstacle to deploying MTA-STS at a small organization.
Limitations
- Very little guided remediation; URIports tells you accurately what is wrong and largely leaves the fixing to you, which will strand a first-time deployer.
- Retention is short at thirty days on the lower tiers and ninety on the higher ones, against a year on comparable PowerDMARC and DMARCLY plans.
- Report volume is pooled across DMARC, TLS, and browser report types, so heavy CSP use eats into the same allowance as email reporting.
- No hosted SPF, DKIM, or DMARC record management, so SPF lookup overflow has to be fixed by hand rather than delegated as it can be with PowerDMARC or DMARCLY Safe SPF.
Pricing compared
EasyDMARC
Freemium subscription tiered by number of domains, monthly DMARC-reported email volume, and data history length, with the top tier quoted by sales.
- Free$0
- Plus$35.99
- Premium$71.99
- EnterpriseCustom
For one to four domains, EasyDMARC is priced sensibly against the alternative of paying a deliverability consultant a few thousand dollars to do the same deployment once and leave no monitoring behind. Plus at $35.99 buys the two features that decide whether a generalist succeeds here, vendor identification and EasySPF, and Premium's unlimited users is worth the step up for any team where marketing and IT both need to look. The value falls off sharply above four domains, where DMARCLY and URIports offer far more domains for less money, and it falls off again if you need an API. Judged as a guided path to p=reject for a small business, it is good value; judged per domain at scale, it is expensive.
URIports
Flat-rate subscription tiered by number of domains, monthly report volume, and retention length, with add-on domain packs and a personal-use plan.
- Sand$1.25
- Pebble$6
- Stone$30
- Mountain$120
- Himalaya$480
On price per monitored domain, URIports is not merely the cheapest option in this category, it is cheaper by an order of magnitude. Twenty-five domains for $30 a month against dmarcian's fifteen for $600 is the kind of gap that demands an explanation, and the explanation is guidance: URIports gives you accurate reports and alerts, not a curriculum. Add the CSP, DNS, and certificate monitoring, which would otherwise be separate subscriptions, and a technical team that owns both mail and websites is getting several tools for the price of one. The two real costs are short retention and the absence of hand-holding. If you have the skills, this is the best value in the category by a wide margin.
Editorial verdict on each
EasyDMARC
EasyDMARC is the DMARC platform to pick when the person running it does not want to become an email authentication expert. Vendor identification and EasySPF remove the two obstacles that most often stall a first deployment, the free tier is genuinely enough to publish a policy and start collecting evidence, and the guided ladder to p=reject is honest about how long it takes. The pricing is where it stops being obviously correct: four domains for $71.99 is poor value beside DMARCLY or URIports, extra domains have no published price, and API access is locked behind a sales conversation. Buy it for one to four domains and a non-specialist owner. Do not buy it expecting help with inbox placement or cold email reputation, because it does neither.
Read the full EasyDMARC profileURIports
URIports is the best value in this category if you have the technical competence to use it. Five domains for $6 a month and twenty-five for $30 is not a small discount against dmarcian or EasyDMARC, it is a different order of magnitude, and the breadth is real: DMARC, TLS reporting, hosted MTA-STS, DANE, DNS and certificate monitoring, and browser-side CSP collection in one console for less than the cost of a single competing subscription. The trade is explicit. Retention is short, there is no record hosting beyond MTA-STS, and there is essentially no guided remediation, so a small business owner encountering DMARC for the first time will stall where a more expensive tool would have carried them. Buy it if you are an engineer or an agency watching many domains. Buy something friendlier if this is your first DMARC deployment, and in either case do not expect it to say anything about inbox placement.
Read the full URIports profileEasyDMARC profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; URIports last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.