LiveChat vs Zendesk
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Editorial assessmentLiveChat compared with Zendesk
Different weight classes solving overlapping problems. Zendesk Suite Team at $55 per agent is a complete ticketing platform with chat attached, extensive workflow automation, a mature help centre, and the enterprise ecosystem that comes with being the category default, though it now runs a second AI resolution meter alongside the seat price. LiveChat is a chat platform first, priced at $49 per person for Team, with better proactive engagement and ecommerce attribution but no native ticketing without buying HelpDesk separately. Choose Zendesk if tickets are the primary object and chat is one channel among several; choose LiveChat if chat is the primary object and you would rather have a great widget with real campaigns than a great ticket queue. Many teams end up running LiveChat alongside Zendesk, which the existing Zendesk integration suggests is a common pattern.
Choose LiveChat if
Sales-led and support teams of roughly 3 to 50 agents that want a fast, dependable chat widget with proactive campaigns, real reporting, and a broad developer API, from a profitable public company with a twenty-year operating record, and that are comfortable paying a fixed per-agent price rather than chasing a usage meter.
Choose Zendesk if
Support organisations that have outgrown a shared inbox and need a real ticketing engine: teams of roughly eight agents and up, companies with multiple brands or products, businesses with contractual SLAs to meet, and anyone whose support genuinely spans email, chat, social, and phone and needs all of it in one queue with one set of reports.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | LiveChat | Zendesk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Support | Support |
| Starting price | $19 per person per month billed annually ($25 monthly) on the Starter plan, limited to one user (14 days trial) | $19 per agent per month (Support Team, billed annually); $55 per agent per month for Suite Team (free plan available) |
| Pricing model | Strictly per person per month, billed annually or monthly, with annual materially cheaper. There is no usage meter on the classic LiveChat plans and no free tier. The autonomous AI Agent is not included and is sold on Text's separate platform plans, metered by resolution. ChatBot, HelpDesk, and KnowledgeBase are separate subscriptions rather than modules of a LiveChat plan. | Per-agent subscription across a cheap Support-only line and a full Suite line, with outcome-based billing for AI agents per automated resolution, plus per-agent add-ons for Copilot, Contact Center, and workforce engagement. |
| Free plan | No | No free plan. Zendesk retired its free tier years ago and the trial is the only evaluation path. |
| Free trial | 14 days, no credit card required | 14 days with Professional features and Copilot included by default |
| Best for | Sales-led and support teams of roughly 3 to 50 agents that want a fast, dependable chat widget with proactive campaigns, real reporting, and a broad developer API, from a profitable public company with a twenty-year operating record, and that are comfortable paying a fixed per-agent price rather than chasing a usage meter. | Support organisations that have outgrown a shared inbox and need a real ticketing engine: teams of roughly eight agents and up, companies with multiple brands or products, businesses with contractual SLAs to meet, and anyone whose support genuinely spans email, chat, social, and phone and needs all of it in one queue with one set of reports. |
| Setup time | A working widget takes under thirty minutes through a script tag or the Shopify, WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, or Webflow app. Getting to a properly configured deployment (groups, routing rules, chat limits, canned responses, targeted message campaigns, knowledge sources for reply suggestions, and reporting tags) realistically takes one to two weeks. Some verified reviewers describe initial setup as convoluted and difficult to get working correctly, so budget more than the marketing implies if your routing is non-trivial. | A working instance in a day: connect the support address, invite agents, install the Web Widget, and use the default views and triggers. A configuration you actually want, with your own ticket fields, forms, views, macros, SLA policies, and business hours, is a two to six week project depending on how complicated your support is. |
| Learning curve | Low for agents and moderate for administrators. The agent application is conventional and a new hire is productive within a day. The administrative surface is larger than most chat tools because of routing rules, groups, campaign targeting, and the reporting suite, and the two genuinely tricky parts are designing targeted message triggers that help rather than annoy, and understanding which capabilities live on which tier before you commit to a plan. | Steep for the administrator, moderate for agents. The agent interface is learnable in a couple of hours. The admin surface, with triggers, automations, views, forms, routing, brands, and Explore, is a genuine skill and there is a whole consulting industry around it for a reason. |
| Platforms | Web application, Windows and macOS desktop apps, iOS and Android apps, Chat widget with native apps for Shopify, WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, and Webflow | Web app, iOS and Android agent apps, Web Widget, iOS, Android, and Unity SDKs, Sunshine Conversations messaging platform |
| Compliance | GDPR, as an EU company operating from Poland, HIPAA compliance offered on the Enterprise tier per the published pricing page, Formal SOC 2 or ISO 27001 attestation not verifiable from the vendor's own published pages at the time of review | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27018, GDPR, HIPAA with a BAA on eligible plans, PCI DSS for the payment card redaction capability |
| Founded | 2002 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Wrocław, Poland, with an office in Boston, Massachusetts | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Ownership | Publicly listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange as Text S.A. (ticker TXT, ISIN PLLVTSF00010), a WIG30 index component. Renamed from LiveChat Software S.A. in 2023. | Privately held, owned by an investor consortium led by Hellman and Friedman and Permira since November 2022 |
Strengths and limitations
LiveChat
Strengths
- Exceptional vendor stability: founded 2002, listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange since April 2014, consistently profitable, with audited quarterly results and group ARR above $89.5 million as of mid-2026. Almost nothing else in this category can be diligenced that thoroughly.
- The agent experience is genuinely refined after twenty years, with message sneak-peek, fast canned responses and tagging, chat supervision and whisper, transfer between groups, and per-agent concurrent chat limits all working the way an experienced chat team expects.
- A complete developer platform available on standard plans rather than gated to enterprise: Customer SDK, webhooks, chat widget JavaScript API, chat APIs, configuration API, and a Reports API, alongside a marketplace of over 200 integrations.
- Deeper reporting than most chat-first competitors, including ecommerce attribution, a per-conversation revenue counter in LiveChat 2.0, agent performance metrics, and Business-tier staffing prediction that forecasts required coverage by time slot.
Limitations
- Strictly per-person billing with no shared licences. Multiple verified Capterra reviewers name this directly, one noting they now need a licence per user rather than a chosen number of licences shared across unlimited users as before. For a rota of part-time agents this is the single most expensive structural choice in the product.
- The autonomous AI Agent is not included in LiveChat plans. Text's own AI page states it is not automatically included and that customers move to the Text platform to get it. Buyers comparing LiveChat against Intercom's Fin or Tidio's Lyro on the LiveChat pricing page are comparing the wrong thing.
- The $19 Starter tier supports exactly one user and keeps only 60 days of chat history, so the advertised entry price is unavailable to any actual team. The step to Team at $49 is a 158 percent increase.
- Repeated price increases are a recurring complaint in verified reviews, with one long-standing customer stating the price has increased dramatically over recent years and the tool is becoming less viable, and another that it is not affordable for small businesses. The September 2025 increase and the end of grandfathering are documented in Text's own investor communications.
Zendesk
Strengths
- The most capable ticketing data model at self-serve prices: custom fields, ticket forms, conditional fields, and a rule engine that handles genuinely complex operations.
- True omnichannel intake where email, messaging, chat, social, and voice all become the same ticket object with one set of views, reports, and SLAs.
- The multi-brand Help Center with custom domains, full theme control, article permissions, and community forums is the strongest knowledge base in the category.
- SLA policies with business-hours calendars and per-target thresholds are mature and are the reason B2B companies with contractual commitments end up here.
Limitations
- The customer-facing experience is unmistakably a ticket system. Reference numbers, portal links, and formal templates are the default, and teams who want support to feel like a personal email conversation are fighting the product.
- The published price is a fraction of the real price. Copilot at $50 per agent, Contact Center at $83 per agent, and resolutions at $1.50 to $2.00 each stack quickly on top of a $55 seat.
- Suite Team is missing things that feel basic: side conversations, skills-based routing, IVR, and custom reporting all require the $115 Professional tier.
- The included AI resolution allowance of five to ten per agent per month is small enough to be decorative.
Pricing compared
LiveChat
Strictly per person per month, billed annually or monthly, with annual materially cheaper. There is no usage meter on the classic LiveChat plans and no free tier. The autonomous AI Agent is not included and is sold on Text's separate platform plans, metered by resolution. ChatBot, HelpDesk, and KnowledgeBase are separate subscriptions rather than modules of a LiveChat plan.
- Starter$19
- Team$49
- Business$79
- EnterpriseQuote
Judged as a live chat product on its own, LiveChat is fairly priced in the middle of the market: $49 per person on Team buys unlimited history, unlimited campaigns, full widget customisation, a broad channel set, and a developer API that several competitors reserve for their top tier. Judged as a customer support platform, the arithmetic is less kind. The $19 headline is a one-seat price, the real team entry is $49, ticketing and a help centre are separate subscriptions, the AI agent lives on a different product line, and SSO is quote-only. A five-agent team wanting chat, tickets, and AI deflection is realistically looking at a LiveChat or Text plan plus a HelpDesk plan plus resolution overage, which lands well above Crisp's flat $45 workspace fee and above what Zoho Desk or Freshdesk charge for a bundled equivalent. Buy LiveChat when chat itself is the point, when the reporting and API depth earn their keep, and when a twenty-year-old profitable public vendor is worth something to your procurement process. Do not buy it as the cheap option, because on total cost it is not.
Zendesk
Per-agent subscription across a cheap Support-only line and a full Suite line, with outcome-based billing for AI agents per automated resolution, plus per-agent add-ons for Copilot, Contact Center, and workforce engagement.
- Support Team$19
- Suite Team$55
- Suite Professional$115
- Suite Enterprise with CopilotContact sales
Zendesk is not overpriced for what it is, but it is very easy to underestimate. Suite Team at $55 a seat buys the most capable ticketing engine, routing system, and multi-brand help center available at self-serve prices, and the platform genuinely scales from ten agents to a thousand without a replatform. The trouble is that the honest configuration for a mid-sized team is Suite Professional at $115, plus Copilot at $50, plus a resolution meter at $1.50 each, which puts a five-agent team comfortably past $1,000 a month before voice. Compared to Zoho Desk at $23 a seat with AI bundled, or Freshdesk at $55 with 500 AI sessions included, Zendesk is charging a large premium for depth that most small businesses will never use. Buy it because you need the engine, not because you need the AI.
Editorial verdict on each
LiveChat
LiveChat is the most institutionally solid product in small-business live chat, and that is both its argument and its limitation. Twenty-four years of continuous development, a Warsaw Stock Exchange listing with audited quarterly results, consistent profitability, and $89.5 million of group ARR make it the easiest vendor in this category to diligence, and the product earns the reputation: the agent experience is refined, the proactive campaign tooling is genuinely good for sales-led chat, the reporting goes deeper than chat-first rivals attempt, and the developer platform is open on standard plans rather than held hostage to an enterprise contract. What holds it back is commercial structure rather than craft. The $19 headline buys one seat, the real team price is $49 per person, ticketing and a help centre are separate subscriptions, the autonomous AI agent lives on a different product line entirely, SSO and HIPAA are quote-only, and price rises plus the end of grandfathering are a live grievance in verified reviews. Buy LiveChat when chat itself is a staffed, measured function, when reporting and API depth pay for themselves, and when vendor stability is worth a premium. If you want a bundled support stack, a free tier, or AI deflection as the centrepiece, the better answers in this category are elsewhere.
Read the full LiveChat profileZendesk
Zendesk is still the most capable customer service platform you can buy without a procurement process, and for support that is genuinely an operation, with queues, brands, contractual SLAs, and a phone line, nothing else at self-serve prices matches the engine. The honest warning is about the bill. The $19 Support Team plan is a trapdoor, Suite Team at $55 is missing things you will want, the tier you actually need is $115, Copilot is another $50 a seat, real voice is another $83, and AI resolutions run $1.50 to $2.00 apiece against an allowance small enough to ignore. Zendesk's May 2026 decision to stop charging for assisted escalations and unverified resolutions is a genuine improvement and more honest than most competitors' definitions, but it does not change the shape of the invoice. Buy Zendesk because you need the ticketing engine and will use it. If you are under eight agents doing email-led support, Help Scout, Zoho Desk, or Freshdesk will make you happier for a third of the money.
Read the full Zendesk profileLiveChat profile last reviewed 2026-08-30; Zendesk last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.