Arrows vs GetAccept
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Editorial assessmentArrows compared with GetAccept
GetAccept is the broader platform: sales rooms plus proposals, quoting, e-signature, and video, with published per-user pricing and a free tier that lets a small team start today. Arrows is narrower and deeper, betting everything on CRM nativeness and AI-assisted room maintenance. If you need the contract workflow and the room in one bill, GetAccept is the more complete purchase. If your problem is that reps never update the room and the CRM never reflects buyer engagement, Arrows solves that better than anything else here.
Choose Arrows if
B2B sales and customer success teams that already run on HubSpot or Salesforce, sell a considered purchase involving multiple stakeholders, and want the buyer-facing plan and the CRM record to be the same source of truth rather than two systems a rep has to reconcile.
Choose GetAccept if
Sales teams of roughly five to fifty reps in Europe and North America that send real proposals and contracts, want buyer engagement visible in the CRM, and would rather buy one tool for the room, the quote, and the signature than assemble three.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Arrows | GetAccept |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sales Rooms | Sales Rooms |
| Starting price | Not published; the last publicly listed entry point was $500 per month (early 2025) (free trial) | $25 per user per month (eSign); $49 per user per month for the sales room tier (14 days trial) |
| Pricing model | Quote-only subscription as of August 2026. Arrows prices by volume of sales rooms and onboarding plans rather than by seat, so internal and external participants are unlimited and adding reps does not raise the bill. Every plan includes full platform access; the tier structure gates enterprise controls such as SAML SSO, SCIM, and audit logs rather than core room features. Monthly and annual billing are both offered, with a discount for paying annually. | Per user per month, in three published plans. eSign is signature and basic document tracking only and is capped at five users; Professional adds the digital sales room, AI, and CRM integrations on annual billing with a five seat minimum; Enterprise unlocks CPQ, SSO, API access, conditional content, and multi-entity setup. Several capabilities, including unlimited AI content, SMS delivery, payment integrations, and some CRM connectors, are separately priced add-ons. |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Free trial with no credit card, covering all products and most business-tier features | 14 days, no credit card required |
| Best for | B2B sales and customer success teams that already run on HubSpot or Salesforce, sell a considered purchase involving multiple stakeholders, and want the buyer-facing plan and the CRM record to be the same source of truth rather than two systems a rep has to reconcile. | Sales teams of roughly five to fifty reps in Europe and North America that send real proposals and contracts, want buyer engagement visible in the CRM, and would rather buy one tool for the room, the quote, and the signature than assemble three. |
| Setup time | A first room can be built the same day the marketplace app is installed. A real rollout takes one to three weeks: designing room templates that match your actual buying process, deciding which Arrows data points map to which CRM properties, and building the workflows that act on room engagement. The template design is the work, not the software. | A first room can be sent within an hour of signing up. A production rollout takes one to three weeks, most of it spent on templates, branding, the content library, and the CRM field mapping rather than on the software itself. |
| Learning curve | Low for reps, since room creation runs from the CRM record they already use and the AI provides a draft. Meaningfully higher for the admin or RevOps owner, who has to decide what a good buying process looks like before encoding it into a template. Reviewers frequently note that Arrows forces you to confront a vague process rather than hiding it, which is useful but not effortless. | Low for reps, who mostly pick a template and fill in variables. Moderate for the admin who owns templates: the editor rewards someone who understands variables, roles, and locked sections, and the absence of conditional content below Enterprise means template design requires planning to avoid duplication. |
| Platforms | Web application, HubSpot App Marketplace app with CRM cards, Salesforce AppExchange integration, Mobile-responsive buyer-facing rooms | Web app, iOS and Android apps, Chrome extension, Gmail and Outlook add-ins, Microsoft AppSource listing |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, Annual third-party penetration testing, Data processing addendum available | GDPR, eIDAS (SES, AdES, QES), ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, ESIGN and UETA |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Fully remote (US-based leadership) | Malmo, Sweden (with a San Francisco office) |
| Ownership | Independent, venture-backed | Venture-backed, independent |
Strengths and limitations
Arrows
Strengths
- The deepest CRM integration in the digital sales room category, endorsed by HubSpot itself, which uses Arrows internally and invested through HubSpot Ventures.
- Rooms are created and maintained from inside the CRM, so adoption does not depend on reps opening another tool.
- AI that assembles the first draft from real deal activity, cutting room creation to a couple of minutes, which is what makes a room-for-every-deal policy realistic.
- No login for buyers, removing the single most common reason sales rooms go unopened.
Limitations
- No published pricing at all as of August 2026; the pricing page is a request form, so buyers cannot self-qualify on budget before booking a demo.
- No free plan, and the last known entry point of $500 per month puts Arrows out of reach of most genuinely small teams in this category.
- Hard dependency on HubSpot or Salesforce. There is no meaningful Pipedrive, Zoho, Attio, or Close support, and most of the product's advantage evaporates without a supported CRM.
- Deeper HubSpot capabilities are gated by HubSpot's own tiers, not just by Arrows: custom object sync needs HubSpot Enterprise, and workflow automation needs a paid Sales or Service Hub.
GetAccept
Strengths
- The sales room and the contract are one system, so engagement data, redlines, and signature all live against the same object.
- Unlimited signatures on every plan, including advanced and qualified eIDAS levels and national eID verification, which few sales room products offer at all.
- Genuinely strong European compliance posture, a practical requirement for Nordic, DACH, and Benelux selling that US-built competitors often cannot meet.
- Deep two-way CRM sync that puts buyer engagement on the deal record rather than leaving it in a separate dashboard.
Limitations
- Conditional content is Enterprise only, so Professional customers who need clause variations duplicate whole templates, the most consistently reported frustration in reviews.
- The eSign plan's five user cap makes it a dead end rather than a starter tier, and it excludes the digital sales room entirely.
- API read and write access is Enterprise only, which blocks programmatic document generation for mid-tier customers.
- The document editor's formatting ceiling is low next to design-led proposal tools; reviewers repeatedly describe template building as fiddly.
Pricing compared
Arrows
Quote-only subscription as of August 2026. Arrows prices by volume of sales rooms and onboarding plans rather than by seat, so internal and external participants are unlimited and adding reps does not raise the bill. Every plan includes full platform access; the tier structure gates enterprise controls such as SAML SSO, SCIM, and audit logs rather than core room features. Monthly and annual billing are both offered, with a discount for paying annually.
- Trial$0
- Business (quoted)Custom
- Enterprise (quoted)Custom
Judged purely on capability per dollar, Arrows is a mid-market purchase that has drifted away from the small-business end of the market. A $500 per month floor, now hidden behind a form, is real money for a five-person sales team, and several competitors in this category start under $100 per month or offer a free tier. What you are paying for is the integration: the sixty-odd synced data points, workflow triggers, and timeline events mean the room is part of the CRM rather than another tab, and that is the difference between a sales room program that survives a quarter and one that does not. If your team lives in HubSpot and your deals involve four or more stakeholders, the math works quickly. If you are evaluating on price, or your CRM is anything else, it does not.
GetAccept
Per user per month, in three published plans. eSign is signature and basic document tracking only and is capped at five users; Professional adds the digital sales room, AI, and CRM integrations on annual billing with a five seat minimum; Enterprise unlocks CPQ, SSO, API access, conditional content, and multi-entity setup. Several capabilities, including unlimited AI content, SMS delivery, payment integrations, and some CRM connectors, are separately priced add-ons.
- eSign$25
- Professional$49
- EnterpriseCustom (widely quoted around $79)
Priced against what it replaces, GetAccept is reasonable: unlimited e-signature, a proposal builder, a content library, and a buyer-facing room for $49 per seat is competitive with buying a signature vendor and a sales room separately, and cheaper than most CPQ-adjacent stacks. The problem for small buyers is shape rather than level. The cheap plan is deliberately not the product, the useful plan carries a five seat annual minimum, and the four features most likely to appear on a requirements list, CPQ, SSO, API, and conditional content, are all behind a quote. Teams of five to fifty that send documents constantly get clear value; teams of two evaluating a sales room should look at lighter products first.
Editorial verdict on each
Arrows
Arrows is the digital sales room for teams whose center of gravity is HubSpot, and it earned that position by deleting the parts of itself that were not. The integration is not a checkbox: roughly sixty data points sync back as CRM properties, rooms are built and published from the deal record, and buyer engagement lands on the timeline where a manager already looks. Add AI that drafts the room from call notes and keeps proposing updates, plus no login for buyers, and you get the two behaviors that decide whether a sales room program works at all, namely reps actually creating rooms and buyers actually opening them. The honest caveat is commercial rather than technical. With no published pricing, no free plan, and a last-known floor of $500 per month, Arrows has moved up-market and out of reach for the smallest teams that this directory usually serves; Dock and Trumpet will quote you a number today and start cheaper. If you run HubSpot or Salesforce, sell into buying committees, and have RevOps capacity to design good templates, Arrows is the strongest product in the category. If any of those three are missing, it is the wrong purchase at this price.
Read the full Arrows profileGetAccept
GetAccept is the digital sales room for teams whose deals end in a real contract. The room, the quote, and the signature are one system, the European compliance work is done properly with qualified signatures and eID verification, and unlimited signing on every plan quietly undercuts per-envelope vendors. It is not, however, a product a very small team can casually try: the $25 plan is a five user signature tool that excludes the sales room, the plan you actually want costs $49 per seat on an annual agreement with a five seat minimum, and CPQ, SSO, API access, and conditional content all sit behind an Enterprise quote. For a five to fifty rep sales team that sends documents every week, especially one selling in Europe, it is one of the strongest consolidation buys in the category. For a two person team that just wants a nice buyer link, it is more platform than the problem requires.
Read the full GetAccept profileArrows profile last reviewed 2026-08-23; GetAccept last reviewed 2026-08-23. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.