Attio vs Close
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Both sides assessedAttio compared with Close
Close is built around the conversation (native calling, SMS, and email with a power dialer); Attio is built around the data model and now the AI agents on top of it. Inside sales teams that live on the phone should pick Close, while product-led and ops-heavy teams that need custom objects, enrichment, and workflow automation should pick Attio. Close's per-seat price includes telephony; Attio's excludes AI usage, so total-cost math differs from the sticker prices.
Close compared with Attio
Close and Attio are the clearest fork in the modern SMB CRM road: Close builds the conversation layer in (dialers, SMS, coaching) on a simple schema, while Attio builds a flexible data platform with AI automation but no phone system. Pick Close if reps' days are measured in dials and talk time; pick Attio if your bottleneck is data, routing, and automation across a non-standard sales motion.
Choose Attio if
Startups and scale-ups (SaaS, VC, and other data-heavy B2B teams) that want a fast, flexible CRM with genuine automation and AI depth, have outgrown spreadsheet-plus-Notion setups, and would rather configure a modern data model than inherit Salesforce's.
Choose Close if
SMB inside sales teams (2 to 50 reps) that live on the phone and follow up across calls, email, and SMS: lending, insurance, home services, logistics, agencies, and any high-velocity B2B or B2C motion where speed-to-lead and volume of conversations decide revenue.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Attio | Close |
|---|---|---|
| Category | CRM | CRM |
| Starting price | $29/user/mo (Plus, billed annually; $36 monthly) (free plan available) | $9/user/mo (Solo, billed annually; $19 monthly) (14 days trial) |
| Pricing model | Per-seat subscription across four tiers (Free, Plus, Pro, Enterprise) with roughly 20% off on annual billing, plus a separate workspace-credit meter for AI and enrichment usage; extra credit packs are sold monthly. | Per-seat subscription across four tiers with steep annual discounts, plus usage-based billing for calling minutes, phone numbers, SMS, and enrichment, and metered AI credits for Chloe and AI features. |
| Free plan | Free tier for up to 3 seats: 3 objects, 50,000 records, 200 emails/month, 3 reports, 50 GB storage, real-time sync and enrichment included. | No |
| Free trial | Trial available on paid tiers; no credit card required to start | 14 days, no credit card required, with $5 of calling and enrichment credit included; 30-day money-back guarantee after purchase |
| Best for | Startups and scale-ups (SaaS, VC, and other data-heavy B2B teams) that want a fast, flexible CRM with genuine automation and AI depth, have outgrown spreadsheet-plus-Notion setups, and would rather configure a modern data model than inherit Salesforce's. | SMB inside sales teams (2 to 50 reps) that live on the phone and follow up across calls, email, and SMS: lending, insurance, home services, logistics, agencies, and any high-velocity B2B or B2C motion where speed-to-lead and volume of conversations decide revenue. |
| Setup time | A working CRM within a day: connecting mailboxes auto-builds people and companies, and importing a CSV fills the gaps. Designing custom objects, workflows, and agents for a full revenue process is more like 1 to 3 weeks of iterative configuration. | Days, not weeks: importing leads, connecting email, and provisioning numbers is self-serve, and a small team can be making tracked calls the first afternoon. Porting existing phone numbers and tuning workflows adds a week or two. |
| Learning curve | Low for reps (records and lists behave like a modern SaaS app), moderate for the admin designing the data model and automations; the flexibility that experts love is exactly what makes the first week feel open-ended. | Low for reps; the interface is opinionated and queue-driven. Managers need modest ramp on Smart View logic, workflow design, and AI-credit governance. |
| Platforms | Web app, iOS and Android apps, REST API, App SDK, MCP server | Web app, Desktop apps (Mac and Windows), iOS and Android apps, REST API |
| Compliance | GDPR (UK/EU-headquartered operations), Public Trust Center at trust.attio.com; detailed certification reports are gated behind the portal rather than published openly | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR (controller and processor obligations), CCPA |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Fully remote (US-incorporated); no central office |
| Ownership | Venture-backed | Bootstrapped, founder-owned, profitable |
Strengths and limitations
Attio
Strengths
- Best-in-class data model flexibility: custom objects, typed attributes, and multiplayer lists make it fit non-standard motions (PLG, VC, partnerships) that template CRMs mangle.
- Self-populating records from real-time email and calendar sync remove most of the data-entry tax that kills CRM adoption.
- The AI layer is integrated, not bolted on: agents, AI workflow steps, and Call Intelligence all operate on the same context layer and automation engine.
- Developer platform (API, SDK, webhooks, MCP) is unusually deep for a company this size, which shows in the reported 400M weekly API calls.
Limitations
- No native calling or SMS; inside sales teams built around the phone need a separate dialer or a different CRM entirely.
- Workspace credits make real costs opaque: the AI features in the marketing all draw from a metered pool that is easy to burn through and priced in add-on packs.
- Flexibility is a tax on setup: without an opinionated default process, someone on the team has to design objects, lists, and workflows, and small teams without an ops-minded person can stall.
- The agentic repositioning is young; buyers should separate the proven core (data model, sync, workflows) from newer agent claims and pilot the latter before depending on them.
Close
Strengths
- Native calling, SMS, and email in one timeline remains the best-executed communication stack in the SMB CRM category, with power and predictive dialers that genuinely raise rep throughput.
- Smart Views turn the CRM into a prioritized work queue, an operational model built by people who ran sales teams themselves.
- Bootstrapped, profitable, and thirteen years old: no pivot risk, no acquisition-driven roadmap whiplash, and pricing that has to make unit-economic sense.
- Chloe is one of the more concrete AI-agent implementations in the category, doing bounded jobs (qualify, book, summarize, update) inside the existing workflow engine rather than as a demo feature.
Limitations
- The simple schema cuts both ways: no custom objects and limited data-model flexibility make Close a poor fit once a business needs to model more than leads, contacts, and opportunities.
- Real costs stack: seats plus calling minutes plus SMS plus AI credits plus add-ons make the effective per-rep price meaningfully higher than the sticker for heavy users.
- Workflows gated to the $99 Growth tier leaves the two cheaper plans without the automation most buyers now expect at entry level.
- Not a marketing platform: no landing pages, nurture campaigns, or attribution, so marketing-led orgs need a second system.
Pricing compared
Attio
Per-seat subscription across four tiers (Free, Plus, Pro, Enterprise) with roughly 20% off on annual billing, plus a separate workspace-credit meter for AI and enrichment usage; extra credit packs are sold monthly.
- Free$0
- Plus$29
- Pro$69
- EnterpriseCustom
Per seat, Attio undercuts Salesforce Sales Cloud and sits close to HubSpot's mid tiers while shipping a more modern product than either, and the Free tier is genuinely usable rather than a demo. The honest total cost, though, is seats plus credits: a Pro workspace leaning on agents, enrichment, and AI workflow steps can add $120 to $410 a month in credit packs on top of per-user fees. For teams that mostly want the fast data model and light automation, Plus is excellent value; for teams buying the agentic pitch, model the credit burn before comparing prices with flat-fee rivals.
Close
Per-seat subscription across four tiers with steep annual discounts, plus usage-based billing for calling minutes, phone numbers, SMS, and enrichment, and metered AI credits for Chloe and AI features.
- Solo$9
- Essentials$35
- Growth$99
- Scale$139
Judged as CRM plus dialer plus SMS platform, Close is priced fairly: replacing a generic CRM, an Aircall-style phone system, and an outreach tool with one $99-per-user Growth seat is competitive even before counting the integration work saved. Judged purely as a CRM against Attio's $29 Plus tier or folk's $24 Standard, it looks expensive, which is the point: you are paying for the conversation infrastructure. The value case therefore rises and falls with call volume; teams that dial all day get their money's worth, teams that do not are overpaying for a phone they rarely pick up.
Editorial verdict on each
Attio
MomentumAttio is the strongest general-purpose CRM built this decade: the data model, real-time sync, and automation engine solve the problems that make teams hate legacy CRMs, and the developer platform is genuinely serious. The 2025-2026 agentic pivot is more promising than proven, and it comes with a credit meter that quietly reshapes the economics for AI-heavy users, so buy Attio first for the core platform and treat the agents as upside you pilot, not the reason you sign. Phone-first teams and marketing-led orgs should look elsewhere; nearly everyone else evaluating a modern CRM should have Attio on the shortlist.
Read the full Attio profileClose
Close is the best CRM you can buy for a team whose revenue scales with conversations: the dialer stack, unified timeline, and queue-driven workflow remain unmatched in the SMB bracket, and thirteen bootstrapped, profitable years mean it will still be here, unpivoted, in five more. Chloe makes the AI story concrete rather than cosmetic, though credits and telephony usage mean the true per-rep cost sits well above the sticker. If your team does not live on the phone, cheaper and more flexible CRMs like Attio will serve better; if it does, Close is the shortlist and probably the answer.
Read the full Close profileAttio profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; Close last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.