Prowi vs QuotaPath
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Both sides assessedProwi compared with QuotaPath
QuotaPath is a far broader platform with plan modelling, territory and capacity planning, ASC 606 support, and multi-level approvals, but it costs a $525 monthly platform fee plus $35 per user and knows nothing about Danish payroll. Prowi is roughly $40 per user with statutory leave handling and direct posting to Danlon and Zenegy. If you pay through a Danish payroll system, Prowi wins on the only criterion that matters; everywhere else QuotaPath is the more capable product.
QuotaPath compared with Prowi
Prowi is a Danish product built around a mobile employee app, payroll integration with Danlon and Zenegy, and statutory handling of vacation and sick leave, at 269 to 349 DKK per user per month. QuotaPath is the stronger fit for a US B2B SaaS company on Salesforce or HubSpot with ASC 606 and approval requirements. Choose Prowi if you are a Nordic company paying commission through a Danish payroll system; choose QuotaPath everywhere else.
Choose Prowi if
Danish and Nordic sales teams of roughly five to fifty people on commission or bonus, running HubSpot or Pipedrive, who pay through Danlon or Zenegy and need statutory leave handling built in, and who want sellers to see their pay in a phone app rather than in a monthly spreadsheet.
Choose QuotaPath if
Small and mid-sized B2B sales teams, roughly five to 150 reps, running on Salesforce or HubSpot, where a RevOps or finance generalist owns commissions part-time and needs a system reps will actually trust, and where the buyer wants to know the price before booking a call.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Prowi | QuotaPath |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Commissions | Commissions |
| Starting price | 269 DKK per user per month (roughly $40) on Starter, billed annually, plus onboarding from 5,500 DKK | $525 per month platform fee plus $35 per user per month (Growth), billed annually (free trial) |
| Pricing model | Per-user subscription billed annually in two published tiers plus a quoted top tier, with a separate one-time onboarding fee on every plan. | Annual subscription combining a monthly platform fee with a per-user rate. The platform fee includes the first five users; everyone beyond that, including admins and managers, is billed at the tier's per-user price. |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | A free trial is offered on the pricing page, with no fixed length published |
| Best for | Danish and Nordic sales teams of roughly five to fifty people on commission or bonus, running HubSpot or Pipedrive, who pay through Danlon or Zenegy and need statutory leave handling built in, and who want sellers to see their pay in a phone app rather than in a monthly spreadsheet. | Small and mid-sized B2B sales teams, roughly five to 150 reps, running on Salesforce or HubSpot, where a RevOps or finance generalist owns commissions part-time and needs a system reps will actually trust, and where the buyer wants to know the price before booking a call. |
| Setup time | Weeks. The onboarding fee, from 5,500 DKK on Starter and 10,500 DKK on Business, buys a guided setup, and the ten pre-configured models on Starter exist specifically so that a standard Danish commission plan does not need to be built from scratch. | QuotaPath publishes an average implementation of 45 to 60 days on Growth and 60 to 90 days on Premium. A single simple plan on a clean HubSpot instance can be live far faster, but the published number is the one to plan against if you have splits, ramps, and multiple plan types. |
| Learning curve | Low on both sides. Sellers get a phone app rather than a portal to remember, and admins on Starter are choosing from a fixed set of models rather than designing rules. Business-tier custom models raise the admin effort in exchange for flexibility. | Low for reps, who mostly consume a statement, and moderate for the admin. The plan designer removes formula-writing but does not remove the need to actually decide what your plan says; most of the pain in an implementation is discovering that the written plan and the paid plan have quietly diverged. |
| Platforms | Web application, iOS app, Android app | Web application, Slack notifications, Salesforce and HubSpot connected apps |
| Compliance | GDPR, with a published data processing agreement and a public GDPR FAQ, Commission calculated in accordance with Danish law for vacation and sick leave | ASC 606 support for commission capitalization and amortization, Audit trail across plan versions, calculations, and adjustments |
| Founded | 2022 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Åbyhøj, near Aarhus, Denmark | Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, with a second base in Austin, Texas |
| Ownership | Privately held Danish company (Prowi ApS, CVR 43243977) | Venture-backed |
Strengths and limitations
Prowi
Strengths
- Publishes per-user prices and onboarding fees on a public page, including the setup cost that most competitors in this category keep private.
- Danish statutory handling of vacation and sick leave is built into the commission calculation, which no international competitor in this set does.
- Direct payroll integration with Danlon and Zenegy turns the payout into a one-click run rather than a monthly export and import ritual.
- The employee app for iOS and Android with live pay tracking and instant sale notifications is the strongest mobile rep experience in this comparison set.
Limitations
- The company is very small and very young: registered in May 2022, three to five employees, and a loss reported for the 2025 financial year. Vendor durability is a legitimate concern.
- Split commission and custom models are Business-tier features, so any team with team-selling or a non-standard plan is starting at 349 DKK per user rather than 269.
- Corrections for historical sales and multi-currency are Prowi+ features requiring a quote, which puts two important capabilities behind a sales conversation.
- The value proposition is tightly bound to Denmark; outside the Nordics the statutory leave handling and payroll integrations are irrelevant and the product becomes an ordinary commission tool.
QuotaPath
Strengths
- Publishes real per-user prices and platform fees on a public page, which in a category where CaptivateIQ, Everstage, Performio, Visdum, and Qobra all require a call is a decisive advantage for a small buyer.
- The rep-facing side is the best part of the product: live statements, pipeline-based earnings forecasts, and a verification workflow that converts disputes from arguments into tracked items.
- ASC 606 support and a commission ledger appear on the entry-paid tier rather than being reserved for enterprise pricing.
- Plan modeling on Premium lets you price a plan change against history before announcing it, which is the difference between a comp strategy and a guess.
Limitations
- The platform fee makes the product genuinely expensive at the very small end; five reps costs $6,300 a year before anyone above the fifth seat is counted.
- Approvals, the API, SSO, and plan modeling are all Premium features, which pushes a finance-led buyer to the $50 tier plus an $800 monthly fee faster than the headline price suggests.
- Native integration coverage is narrower than the larger platforms: two CRMs and a short list of billing systems, with the API doing the rest of the work.
- The published implementation window is 45 to 60 days on Growth and 60 to 90 on Premium, which is not the same as a self-serve product you can be live on this week.
Pricing compared
Prowi
Per-user subscription billed annually in two published tiers plus a quoted top tier, with a separate one-time onboarding fee on every plan.
- Starter269 DKK per user per month
- Business349 DKK per user per month
- Prowi+Quoted
For a Danish sales team, this is strong value and the comparison set is not really the American vendors. At roughly $40 per user with published onboarding from 5,500 DKK, Prowi costs about the same as Sales Cookie and less than QuotaPath once the platform fee is counted, and it does something neither of them does: it applies Danish statutory leave rules to variable pay and posts the result into Danlon or Zenegy without a human. The employee app and the pre-payout approval flow are worth more than their feature descriptions suggest, because they remove the argument rather than documenting it. The weaknesses are structural rather than about pricing: split commission and direct payroll both live on the Business tier, corrections and multi-currency sit behind a quote, and the vendor is a three-to-five person company that filed a loss in 2025. Excellent value inside Denmark. Almost no case for it outside the Nordics.
QuotaPath
Annual subscription combining a monthly platform fee with a per-user rate. The platform fee includes the first five users; everyone beyond that, including admins and managers, is billed at the tier's per-user price.
- Growth$35 per user per month plus a $525 per month platform fee
- Premium$50 per user per month plus an $800 per month platform fee
- StrategicCustom
Judged against the category, QuotaPath is the transparency premium: you pay a real platform fee, and in exchange you know the number before you speak to anyone. At 20 users on Growth the all-in cost is around $12,600 a year, which is well under what a scoped enterprise ICM quote typically lands at, and the feature set at that price includes ASC 606, a ledger, and a rep verification workflow that most cheaper tools do not have. The weak spot is the bottom of the range: a five-person team pays $6,300 for a product whose per-seat efficiency only appears at scale. If you have fewer than eight or ten payees and simple plans, the platform fee is hard to defend. Between roughly ten and 100 payees it is the best-documented value in the category.
Editorial verdict on each
Prowi
Prowi is a local product that beats the international field on local ground. If you are a Danish company paying commission through Danlon or Zenegy, the statutory leave handling and the one-click payroll run remove the two steps that actually break a Danish commission process, and no American competitor offers either. The employee app and the approve-before-payout flow are genuinely well judged, catching errors before the money moves instead of documenting them afterwards. Prices and onboarding fees are published openly, and a five-person team can sign up without a sales call. Set against that: split commission needs the Business tier, corrections and multi-currency need a quote, there is no ASC 606 story, and the company is three to five people two years past registration with a loss on the books. Inside Denmark, this is the sensible first choice. Outside the Nordics, there is no reason to buy it.
Read the full Prowi profileQuotaPath
Category LeaderQuotaPath is the default first evaluation in sales commissions for a small company, mostly because it will tell you the price. Behind the transparency there is a real product: the best rep-facing statement and dispute workflow in the category, ASC 606 and a ledger on the entry-paid tier, plan modeling on Premium, and onboarding that is included rather than invoiced. The costs are honest too. The platform fee makes it expensive under about ten payees, the features a finance buyer wants are mostly on the $50 tier, native integration coverage is narrow, and the company is running on a 2022 Series B. Buy it if you have ten to 100 payees, live in Salesforce or HubSpot, and want reps to stop arguing about their numbers. If you have five reps and one flat rate, keep the spreadsheet another two quarters.
Read the full QuotaPath profileProwi profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; QuotaPath last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.