AgencyAnalytics vs DashThis
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Both sides assessedAgencyAnalytics compared with DashThis
The closest like-for-like on the small end. DashThis is priced by dashboard count rather than client count and is deliberately narrower: it does automated dashboards and reports well and stops there. AgencyAnalytics carries the surrounding agency apparatus (client portal logins, task management, goals and alerts, rank tracking, benchmarks) that DashThis does not attempt. Agencies whose only requirement is a monthly dashboard per client often find DashThis cheaper and simpler; agencies selling a reporting experience as part of the retainer generally end up here.
DashThis compared with AgencyAnalytics
The most direct comparison, and the split is scope. AgencyAnalytics prices per client and bundles the wider agency operating system: a client portal with logins, staff task management, and a much larger connector list. DashThis is narrower and cheaper at small volumes, includes white labeling and every integration on its entry plan, and is faster to a finished report. Agencies that want reporting plus client operations in one bill go to AgencyAnalytics; agencies that already have a project management stack and just want the monthly report to stop hurting stay on DashThis.
Choose AgencyAnalytics if
Small and mid-sized marketing agencies and freelancers who bill retainers and need branded, automated client reporting across many accounts: strongest when the channel mix is standard (search, paid, social, email, local) and the value is time saved and client retention rather than deep custom analysis.
Choose DashThis if
Small and mid-sized marketing agencies, freelancers, and in-house teams that report the same channel metrics to the same audience every month and want a branded, automated deliverable without hiring anyone technical to build it.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | AgencyAnalytics | DashThis |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reporting | Reporting |
| Starting price | $20 USD per client per month billed annually (roughly $25 billed monthly) (14 days trial) | $44 per month on the Individual plan billed yearly ($54 billed monthly) for 3 dashboards and 15 sources (14 days trial) |
| Pricing model | Per-client subscription. As of the 2026 pricing change there is one self-serve plan with every feature unlocked, priced per client account per month, with unlimited data sources, reports, dashboards, staff users, and client users. Rank tracking, AI search tracking, and database connectors are paid add-ons on top. Agencies with 25 or more clients are directed to a custom Enterprise agreement for volume discounts. Customers who signed up under the earlier four-tier structure are generally still billed on those legacy plans. | Flat monthly subscription metered on two axes since the March 2026 change: the number of dashboards (one dashboard equals one report, typically one per client) and the number of connected data sources, where a source is one authorized account such as a GA4 property or an ad account, counted once no matter how many widgets use it. Users and integrations are unlimited on every plan, and white labeling is included on every plan. Annual billing is cheaper than monthly on every tier. |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | 14 days, no credit card required, plus a 30-day money-back guarantee | 14 days with 10 dashboards, no credit card required |
| Best for | Small and mid-sized marketing agencies and freelancers who bill retainers and need branded, automated client reporting across many accounts: strongest when the channel mix is standard (search, paid, social, email, local) and the value is time saved and client retention rather than deep custom analysis. | Small and mid-sized marketing agencies, freelancers, and in-house teams that report the same channel metrics to the same audience every month and want a branded, automated deliverable without hiring anyone technical to build it. |
| Setup time | The first client is genuinely a same-day exercise: create the client, authorize four or five OAuth connections, apply a channel template, and schedule delivery. Rolling an established roster over takes longer, typically a week or two of evenings for 20 clients, because every connection has to be authorized individually and each client's report needs a review against what they were previously sent. | A first usable dashboard in well under an hour: pick a template, authorize the accounts, adjust widgets. The real work is the first client's report, after which cloning brings each additional client down to minutes. Budget a day to configure branding, custom domain, sending address, and the scheduled dispatch properly for an agency-wide rollout. |
| Learning curve | Low. The editor is a widget grid and the mental model (client, source, widget, report, schedule) is small enough to hold in your head. The part that takes practice is discipline rather than skill: standardizing on two or three templates instead of hand-building a bespoke report per client, which is what determines whether the tool still saves time at 40 clients. | Deliberately low, and the product is aimed at account managers rather than analysts. Nothing here requires SQL, data modelling, or a formula language beyond simple arithmetic in calculated widgets. The skills that take longer are editorial: deciding which twelve metrics belong on a client report and writing commentary that says something. |
| Platforms | Web application, iOS and Android mobile apps, Branded client portal on a custom domain | Web application (browser-based), Responsive dashboards viewable on mobile, PDF export, Scheduled email delivery |
| Compliance | GDPR, CCPA, SOC 2 | GDPR-aligned data handling, OAuth-based platform authorization, Google Ads API approved developer |
| Founded | 2010 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Toronto, Canada | Quebec City, Quebec, Canada |
| Ownership | Independent and 100 percent employee-owned | Acquired by saas.group (September 2023); operates as a brand of Moment Zero inc |
Strengths and limitations
AgencyAnalytics
Strengths
- Purpose-built for the agency workflow: client accounts, white-label branding, client logins, and per-client permissions are the model rather than features bolted onto a BI tool.
- One plan with every feature unlocked, so a two-client freelancer gets the same custom domain, API access, and dashboards as a 30-client agency.
- Unlimited staff and client users at no extra charge, unusual in a category where seat pricing is common.
- Broad, agency-relevant connector coverage across paid, organic, social, local, call tracking, email, and ecommerce, including call tracking sources that generic BI tools ignore.
Limitations
- Integration reliability is the most consistent user complaint: connections drop and need manual reauthorization, and a silently disconnected source produces a report that goes out with missing data.
- Custom metrics cannot express advanced filtering or segmentation. If the calculation you want requires filtering a source before aggregating, the formula layer will not get you there.
- Report layout control is limited to the widget grid, and the report title page in particular resists customization, which shows up repeatedly in reviews from agencies with strict brand standards.
- No data modelling, SQL, or cross-source joins beyond what the connectors expose, so any question requiring blended data at a granularity the APIs do not return is out of scope.
DashThis
Strengths
- Fastest route in the category from a blank account to a presentable branded client report, because templates and widget presets do the design work.
- Full white labeling, custom domain, and custom email sender are included on the $44 entry plan rather than reserved for higher tiers.
- Unlimited users on every plan, so seats never enter the pricing conversation for an agency with a large or growing team.
- Support quality is the most consistently praised aspect in user reviews, with real humans on chat rather than a deflection bot.
Limitations
- No public API for pushing data in; anything outside the roughly thirty-plus native connectors arrives as a CSV upload or a Google Sheet you maintain yourself. The authentication API that does exist is a partner-only mechanism for issuing dashboard access tokens, not a data ingestion route.
- The connector list is narrow next to Supermetrics or Funnel: no meaningful CRM depth beyond HubSpot, little call tracking beyond CallRail, and nothing for offline or point-of-sale revenue.
- Connector depth varies by platform, and some integrations expose fewer dimensions and breakdowns than the source platform's own reporting, which forces manual supplementation for granular analysis.
- Data blending is limited to the aggregation and calculated widget features; there is no join across differently shaped datasets and no modelling layer, so genuine cross-channel attribution is out of scope.
Pricing compared
AgencyAnalytics
Per-client subscription. As of the 2026 pricing change there is one self-serve plan with every feature unlocked, priced per client account per month, with unlimited data sources, reports, dashboards, staff users, and client users. Rank tracking, AI search tracking, and database connectors are paid add-ons on top. Agencies with 25 or more clients are directed to a custom Enterprise agreement for volume discounts. Customers who signed up under the earlier four-tier structure are generally still billed on those legacy plans.
- Core (self-serve)$20 USD per client
- Rank Tracker (add-on)$20.83 to $41.67 USD
- AI Tracker (add-on, beta)$20.83 USD
- EnterpriseCustom quote
At $20 per client per month, the arithmetic is straightforward: if reporting costs an account manager two hours per client per month, the tool pays for itself several times over at any billable rate. For a freelancer with four clients that is $80 a month for branded reporting a client can log into, which is cheap relative to what it does for retention. The model gets less flattering at scale, because a 40-client agency is paying about $9,600 a year for what is fundamentally a rendering layer over APIs, and at that size the add-on line items and the ceiling on custom analysis start to matter. The 2026 move to one all-features plan removed the old complaint that upgrades bought features rather than capacity, which was the most common value objection. Judged strictly on capability per dollar the free Looker Studio route is cheaper; judged on hours recovered and on how a client perceives a branded portal, AgencyAnalytics remains the default for small agencies for good reason.
DashThis
Flat monthly subscription metered on two axes since the March 2026 change: the number of dashboards (one dashboard equals one report, typically one per client) and the number of connected data sources, where a source is one authorized account such as a GA4 property or an ad account, counted once no matter how many widgets use it. Users and integrations are unlimited on every plan, and white labeling is included on every plan. Annual billing is cheaper than monthly on every tier.
- Individual$44 billed yearly, $54 billed monthly
- Professional$139 billed yearly, $164 billed monthly
- Business$279 billed yearly, $324 billed monthly
- StandardFrom $429 billed yearly, from $499 billed monthly
Judged as a replacement for manual reporting labour, the entry tiers are cheap: $44 a month against several hours of account manager time is not a close call. The comparison gets harder against AgencyAnalytics and Swydo, which price nearer to per-client and bundle more agency operations, and against Looker Studio, which is free if someone on the team will build and maintain the connectors. DashThis is priced on capacity rather than on features, and including full white labeling and every integration on the cheapest plan is a genuinely buyer-friendly choice that competitors rarely match. The counterweight is the March 2026 source meter, which can push a 10-dashboard agency onto a 25-dashboard plan for reasons that have nothing to do with client count.
Editorial verdict on each
AgencyAnalytics
AgencyAnalytics is the default small-agency reporting tool for defensible reasons: it is built around the client account rather than the dashboard, it white-labels properly down to the domain and the sending address, it charges nothing for seats, and the 2026 move to a single $20-per-client plan removed the old irritation of paying more to unlock features rather than capacity. For an agency currently losing three or four days a month to exports and slide decks, the payback is measured in weeks. The honest limits are worth stating plainly: it renders API data rather than modelling it, custom metrics fall over when a calculation needs filtering, report layout is a grid rather than a canvas, integration disconnections are a recurring operational annoyance, and rank tracking now costs extra despite being the original product. Buy it if the job is producing many branded client reports reliably at a predictable per-client cost; look at a warehouse and a BI tool instead if the job is answering questions the connectors were never built to answer.
Read the full AgencyAnalytics profileDashThis
DashThis has been doing one job since 2011 and does it with unusual economy: pick a template, connect the accounts, brand it, schedule it, and never build that report by hand again. Including full white labeling, a custom domain, unlimited users, and every integration on a $44 plan is the most buyer-friendly packaging in this category, and the support reputation is earned. The boundaries are equally clear and worth taking seriously: no public ingestion API, a connector list that thins out fast beyond marketing platforms, real blending limits, a cap on widgets per dashboard, and no free plan. The March 2026 source meter is the newest thing to check, because it can put you on a larger plan for connecting ad accounts rather than for adding clients. For a small agency or freelancer whose reporting lives entirely inside the mainstream ad, analytics, and SEO platforms, it is one of the highest-return purchases available. For anyone who needs CRM, offline, or proprietary data joined in, look at a pipeline tool instead and accept that you will build the visualization yourself.
Read the full DashThis profileAgencyAnalytics profile last reviewed 2026-08-23; DashThis last reviewed 2026-08-23. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.