AgencyAnalytics
White-label client reporting for marketing agencies, priced per client
AgencyAnalytics is a client reporting and dashboard platform built specifically for marketing agencies. It connects to 85+ marketing data sources (Google Ads, GA4, Meta, Search Console, call tracking, ecommerce, email, and local listings), assembles the results into white-labeled reports and live dashboards under the agency's own logo and domain, and sends them to clients on a schedule. It is sold per client account rather than per seat or per data row, with a 14-day free trial and no free plan.
Overview
Agency reporting is a labour problem before it is an analytics problem. An agency with twenty retainer clients has to pull numbers from five or six platforms per client every month, assemble them into something a business owner will actually read, and do it again thirty days later. AgencyAnalytics exists to remove that recurring cost, and its whole design follows from that: connectors that authenticate once and refresh themselves, a drag-and-drop report editor, templates per channel, and scheduled delivery so the report goes out whether or not anyone remembered.
The product started life in 2010 as My SEO Tool, a rank tracker built by Joe Kindness and Blake Acheson in Toronto, and the SEO ancestry still shows in the depth of its search reporting relative to its competitors. It broadened into cross-channel reporting over the following decade and is now used by roughly 7,000 agencies covering about 150,000 client accounts. The company is bootstrapped, took no venture funding, and describes itself as 100 percent employee-owned with a distributed team of around 115 people.
In 2026 the company collapsed its four-tier plan structure (Freelancer, Agency, Agency Pro, Enterprise) into a single self-serve plan at $20 USD per client per month billed annually, with every feature unlocked and unlimited staff and client users. That is a real simplification: features that used to gate an upgrade, such as custom dashboards, white-label domains, and API access, are now included at any roster size. The counterweights are that rank tracking and AI search tracking moved out of the base plan into paid add-ons, database connectors remain an add-on, and agencies that signed up before the change are generally still on legacy tiers, which is why third-party pricing articles and the vendor's own FAQ still reference plan names that no longer exist on the pricing page.
What AgencyAnalytics is not is a data warehouse or a BI tool. It reads marketing APIs and renders them; it does not give you SQL, arbitrary joins across sources, or a modelling layer. Agencies that need to blend a client's CRM revenue with ad spend at a granularity the connectors do not expose will hit that ceiling, and the usual answer is a pipeline tool feeding a warehouse rather than a reporting product.
Best for
Small and mid-sized marketing agencies and freelancers who bill retainers and need branded, automated client reporting across many accounts: strongest when the channel mix is standard (search, paid, social, email, local) and the value is time saved and client retention rather than deep custom analysis.
Not the right fit for
- In-house marketing teams reporting on one business; the per-client pricing model and the whole client-portal apparatus are wasted on a single account.
- Agencies that need genuine data modelling, SQL, or arbitrary joins across sources; this renders API data, it does not transform it.
- Teams whose reporting requirement is a warehouse feed rather than a document, where a pipeline tool into BigQuery is the correct purchase.
- Anyone who needs pixel-level control over report layout; the editor is a widget grid, and the title page in particular is constrained.
- Agencies with 40 or more clients and thin margins per account, where per-client pricing compounds into a five-figure annual line unless volume terms are negotiated.
- Buyers who want to evaluate on a free plan; there is a 14-day trial and a 30-day money-back guarantee but no permanently free tier.
How it works
- 1
You create a Client (renamed from Campaign) for each business you report on, then connect that client's marketing accounts by OAuth: Google Ads, GA4, Search Console, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, Shopify, Mailchimp, CallRail, and so on. Connections are per client, so the same agency Google account can authorize many clients without re-entering credentials each time.
- 2
Reports and dashboards are built in a drag-and-drop editor from widgets tied to specific metrics on specific sources. You can start from a channel template (SEO, PPC, social, ecommerce, multi-channel), duplicate a report you already like across clients, or build from blank. The same widget library powers both scheduled PDF or slide-deck style reports and the live dashboards clients see in the portal.
- 3
White labelling covers logo, colour scheme, a custom domain, and a custom sending email address, so the client experience carries the agency's brand rather than the vendor's. Client users get their own logins with permissions scoped to their own data, which is what turns a monthly PDF into a portal clients can check themselves.
- 4
Reports are scheduled and sent automatically, optionally routed through an approval step so an account manager reviews before the client sees it. Around that sit the monitoring features: goal and budget tracking, metric alerts on thresholds, anomaly detection on unusual spikes and drops, trend forecasting, and benchmark comparisons against the platform's aggregate industry data.
- 5
The AI layer sits on top of the same data. AI summaries draft the written commentary a report normally needs, Ask AI answers questions in natural language, and an MCP endpoint lets Claude or ChatGPT query a client's performance directly from the assistant rather than through the interface.
Feature breakdown
29 features in 5 modulesReporting and dashboards
The core deliverable: branded documents and live views built once and reused across a roster.- Drag-and-drop report editor
- Reports are assembled from a widget grid where each widget is bound to one metric on one connected source, with sizing, sections, and page breaks handled visually.
- Channel report templates
- Prebuilt layouts for SEO, PPC, social, email, ecommerce, and multi-channel retainers, which is usually how a new agency gets its first client report out in an afternoon.
- Live client dashboards
- The same widgets rendered as an always-current view, so a client checking on the fifteenth of the month sees real numbers rather than waiting for the next PDF.
- Scheduled automated delivery
- Reports send themselves on a monthly, weekly, or custom schedule from the agency's own domain and email address, with the schedule set per client.
- Report approvals and version history
- An optional review step holds a report until an account manager approves it, and version history keeps what was sent previously rather than only the current state.
- Roll-up reports and dashboards
- Aggregate several clients, brands, or franchise locations into one combined view, used both for multi-location clients and for the agency's own portfolio review.
- Bulk operations
- Push a report or dashboard change across many clients at once instead of editing each account, the feature that makes a fifty-client roster maintainable.
Data connections
85+ marketing sources plus escape hatches for everything they do not cover.- 85+ native integrations
- Coverage across PPC (24 sources), SEO (13), social (13), analytics (11), local (11), call tracking (10), email (14), and ecommerce (5), authorized per client by OAuth.
- Multi-account connections
- Some integrations allow several accounts of the same type on one client, up to ten on the historical Agency plan, which is how franchise and multi-region clients are handled.
- Google Sheets integration
- The standard workaround for anything without a connector: maintain a sheet and pull it into the report as a first-class data source.
- Custom metrics
- Derive new figures from existing connected metrics with formulas, for example cost per qualified lead built from ad spend and a call tracking count.
- Database connectors
- Amazon Redshift, BigQuery, and similar warehouse sources are available as a paid add-on rather than in the base plan, aimed at agencies with their own data infrastructure.
- REST API access
- Included at every plan level as of the 2026 pricing change, used to push custom data in and to automate client provisioning.
Monitoring and analysis
The layer that turns a report into something the agency reads before the client does.- Goal and budget tracking
- Set targets per metric per client and track pace against them, including ad budget pacing so overspend is caught mid-month rather than at invoice time.
- Metric alerts
- Threshold-based notifications on any tracked metric, so a conversion collapse reaches the account manager before the client notices it.
- Anomaly detection
- Automatic flagging of unusual spikes and drops against a metric's own history, which catches broken tracking as often as it catches performance problems.
- Trend forecasting
- Projects a metric forward from historical data, mostly used to show a client whether the quarter is on track at the halfway point.
- Benchmark comparisons
- Compares a client's results against aggregated industry averages drawn from the platform's own base, which is a genuine advantage of a vendor with 150,000 client accounts.
AI and search visibility
Recent additions aimed at the commentary layer and at AI search.- AI report summaries
- Drafts the written analysis section of a report from the underlying numbers, removing the part of reporting that resists templating.
- Ask AI
- Natural-language questions against a client's connected data, answered in the interface without building a widget first.
- MCP access for Claude and ChatGPT
- An MCP endpoint lets an AI assistant query client performance directly, so an account manager can ask about a campaign in their assistant instead of opening the platform.
- AI Tracker add-on
- Monitors brand visibility, sentiment, position, and citations across ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, and Claude; billed separately at $20.83 per month per 250 credits.
- Rank Tracker add-on
- Weekly desktop and mobile keyword rankings on Google and Bing, local and multi-language; a paid add-on at $41.67 per month per 500 keywords despite rank tracking being the product's origin.
Client and team management
The account-service surface that distinguishes an agency tool from a dashboard tool.- Branded client portal
- Clients log in to the agency's domain and see their dashboards, reports, and history, which converts reporting from a monthly email into an ongoing touchpoint.
- White-label branding
- Logo, colour scheme, custom domain, and custom sending email address, with per-client branding so a white-label reseller can present under the end client's brand.
- Unlimited staff and client users
- No seat charge in either direction, so cost scales with client count rather than headcount, which suits agencies with junior staff and large client-side stakeholder lists.
- Custom permissions and access control
- Scope each user to specific clients and specific views, the practical requirement for letting freelancers and contractors into the platform.
- Task management
- Assign work with deadlines against a client, so the action items generated by a report have somewhere to live besides a separate project tool.
- Client communication
- Comment threads and updates attached to reports and dashboards, keeping the discussion of a number next to the number.
Use cases
4 documentedSix-person SEO and PPC agency with 18 retainer clients
Two account managers spend the first four working days of every month exporting spreadsheets and rebuilding decks, which is roughly 60 billable hours a year lost to copy and paste.
One report template per service tier is built once and applied across the roster, delivery is scheduled for the first of the month, and the account managers spend the recovered days writing recommendations instead of assembling numbers.
Freelance marketing consultant with four clients
Reporting is done in Looker Studio, which works but looks like Google's product, and renewal conversations keep coming down to whether the client can see what they are paying for.
Four client slots cost $80 a month billed annually and produce branded reports on a custom domain plus a portal each client can check independently, which changes the renewal conversation from justification to review.
Local agency serving a multi-location franchise
Twelve locations each have their own Google Business Profile, ad account, and call tracking number, and the franchisor wants both per-location detail and a group-level view.
Each location is a client with its own dashboard, a roll-up report aggregates all twelve for the franchisor, and metric alerts flag the single location whose cost per call doubled without anyone reading twelve reports to find it.
Agency operations lead auditing account health
Underperformance surfaces at quarterly business reviews, by which point the client has already decided to leave, and there is no early-warning system across 30 accounts.
Goals and budget pacing are configured per client and anomaly detection runs across the roster, so tracking breakages and conversion drops arrive as alerts within days instead of appearing as a surprise in a QBR deck.
Pricing
from $20 USD per client per month billed annually (roughly $25 billed monthly)Per-client subscription. As of the 2026 pricing change there is one self-serve plan with every feature unlocked, priced per client account per month, with unlimited data sources, reports, dashboards, staff users, and client users. Rank tracking, AI search tracking, and database connectors are paid add-ons on top. Agencies with 25 or more clients are directed to a custom Enterprise agreement for volume discounts. Customers who signed up under the earlier four-tier structure are generally still billed on those legacy plans.
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Core (self-serve) | $20 USD per client per month, billed annually |
Monthly billing runs roughly $25 per client with no commitment; annual billing saves about 20 percent and locks a one-year term. |
| Rank Tracker (add-on) | $20.83 to $41.67 USD per month, billed annually |
|
| AI Tracker (add-on, beta) | $20.83 USD per month, per 250 credits, billed annually |
|
| Enterprise | Custom quote annual agreement |
The only route to a per-client price below the published rate; worth asking for well before 25 clients if growth is predictable. |
Add-ons
- Rank Tracker ($41.67 USD per month per 500 keywords, billed annually): Priced independently of client count, so a roster with heavy SEO work carries a meaningful second line item.
- AI Tracker (beta) ($20.83 USD per month per 250 credits, billed annually): Tracks brand presence in AI search engines; credit consumption depends on prompt and engine volume.
- Database connectors (Add-on, quoted): Required for Amazon Redshift and similar warehouse sources; included in Enterprise agreements.
Billing notes
- The meter is client accounts, not users, data volume, or report count, so an agency's bill tracks its roster exactly and drops when a client churns.
- Annual billing saves about 20 percent but commits a full year; monthly billing is cancellable at any time and is the honest way to trial a roster-wide rollout.
- Rank tracking is no longer part of the base subscription. An SEO-heavy agency should price the Rank Tracker add-on into the comparison rather than reading $20 per client as the all-in number.
- Currency is selectable at checkout in USD, CAD, AUD, NZD, GBP, and EUR, and the company notes pricing may vary by region.
- Customers from before the 2026 restructure are typically grandfathered on the old Freelancer, Agency, and Agency Pro tiers, which is why the vendor's own pricing FAQ still refers to plan-specific dashboard and multi-account limits that the current plan does not have.
- Bulk and volume discounts exist but are sales-negotiated; the published rate is flat until you ask.
Value assessment: At $20 per client per month, the arithmetic is straightforward: if reporting costs an account manager two hours per client per month, the tool pays for itself several times over at any billable rate. For a freelancer with four clients that is $80 a month for branded reporting a client can log into, which is cheap relative to what it does for retention. The model gets less flattering at scale, because a 40-client agency is paying about $9,600 a year for what is fundamentally a rendering layer over APIs, and at that size the add-on line items and the ceiling on custom analysis start to matter. The 2026 move to one all-features plan removed the old complaint that upgrades bought features rather than capacity, which was the most common value objection. Judged strictly on capability per dollar the free Looker Studio route is cheaper; judged on hours recovered and on how a client perceives a branded portal, AgencyAnalytics remains the default for small agencies for good reason.
Strengths & limitations
Strengths
- Purpose-built for the agency workflow: client accounts, white-label branding, client logins, and per-client permissions are the model rather than features bolted onto a BI tool.
- One plan with every feature unlocked, so a two-client freelancer gets the same custom domain, API access, and dashboards as a 30-client agency.
- Unlimited staff and client users at no extra charge, unusual in a category where seat pricing is common.
- Broad, agency-relevant connector coverage across paid, organic, social, local, call tracking, email, and ecommerce, including call tracking sources that generic BI tools ignore.
- Templates and bulk operations make a large roster maintainable, which is the difference between a tool that works at five clients and one that works at fifty.
- Benchmark data drawn from roughly 150,000 client accounts gives context that a single agency could not assemble on its own.
- Bootstrapped, profitable, and employee-owned since 2010, with no acquisition or investor-driven repricing risk of the kind that has repeatedly disrupted this category.
Limitations
- Integration reliability is the most consistent user complaint: connections drop and need manual reauthorization, and a silently disconnected source produces a report that goes out with missing data.
- Custom metrics cannot express advanced filtering or segmentation. If the calculation you want requires filtering a source before aggregating, the formula layer will not get you there.
- Report layout control is limited to the widget grid, and the report title page in particular resists customization, which shows up repeatedly in reviews from agencies with strict brand standards.
- No data modelling, SQL, or cross-source joins beyond what the connectors expose, so any question requiring blended data at a granularity the APIs do not return is out of scope.
- Rank tracking, once the product's whole reason to exist, is now a separately billed add-on, and AI search tracking is credit-metered on top of that.
- Per-client pricing compounds: at 30 to 40 clients the annual cost approaches five figures for a reporting layer, and the published rate does not step down without a sales conversation.
- No free plan, so evaluation is bounded by the 14-day trial and the money-back guarantee rather than an indefinite starter tier.
- The vendor's own pricing FAQ still describes legacy plan tiers that the current plan replaced, which makes verifying what you are actually buying harder than it should be.
Head-to-head comparisons
6 alternativesAgencyAnalytics vs DashThis
from $44 per month on the Individual plan billed yearly ($54 billed monthly) for 3 dashboards and 15 sourcesThe closest like-for-like on the small end. DashThis is priced by dashboard count rather than client count and is deliberately narrower: it does automated dashboards and reports well and stops there. AgencyAnalytics carries the surrounding agency apparatus (client portal logins, task management, goals and alerts, rank tracking, benchmarks) that DashThis does not attempt. Agencies whose only requirement is a monthly dashboard per client often find DashThis cheaper and simpler; agencies selling a reporting experience as part of the retainer generally end up here.
Full AgencyAnalytics vs DashThis comparisonAgencyAnalytics vs Whatagraph
from From 699 euros per month, billed annually (Max, from 50 source credits)Whatagraph sits a tier up in both price and ambition, with more emphasis on cross-source data blending, transfer to a warehouse, and a design-led report look. AgencyAnalytics is cheaper per client, has broader connector coverage in SEO and call tracking, and gets a new agency to a sent report faster. Choose Whatagraph when the constraint is blending and transforming data across sources; choose AgencyAnalytics when the constraint is producing many branded reports per month at a predictable per-client cost.
Full AgencyAnalytics vs Whatagraph comparisonAgencyAnalytics vs Swydo
from EUR 69 per month for the first 10 data sources (EUR 62 per month billed annually)Swydo is the other long-standing per-client-priced agency reporting tool, similarly focused and similarly straightforward, with particular strength in PPC reporting and in KPI and budget monitoring. AgencyAnalytics has a wider connector list, a real client portal, and the AI and benchmark layer; Swydo tends to appeal to agencies that want fewer moving parts. Both are honest purchases at similar price points and the decision usually comes down to which connector list covers your clients' actual stack.
Full AgencyAnalytics vs Swydo comparisonAgencyAnalytics vs Looker Studio
from Free, unlimited reports and viewers; Pro from about $9 per licensed user per monthThe free alternative, and the one every agency evaluates first. Looker Studio can do everything AgencyAnalytics does visually and more besides, at zero licence cost, provided someone maintains the connectors (often paid separately), builds each report, and accepts Google branding and no client portal. AgencyAnalytics is the argument that agency time and client perception cost more than $20 per client per month. Agencies with a technical operations person and patience save real money on Looker Studio; agencies without one usually pay to stop maintaining it.
Full AgencyAnalytics vs Looker Studio comparisonAgencyAnalytics vs Databox
from $0 (Free), then $64 per month billed annually (Analyst)Databox is a KPI dashboard product aimed at business performance monitoring rather than agency deliverables. It is stronger at goal tracking, scorecards, and mobile-first metric watching, and it has a usable free tier. AgencyAnalytics is stronger at the thing agencies are actually paid for: branded, scheduled, multi-page client reports and a portal under the agency's domain. Some agencies run Databox internally for their own metrics and AgencyAnalytics for client-facing output.
Full AgencyAnalytics vs Databox comparisonAgencyAnalytics vs Supermetrics
from €49 per month (Starter), or €39 per month billed yearlyNot really a competitor so much as the layer beneath. Supermetrics moves marketing data into spreadsheets, warehouses, and BI tools; AgencyAnalytics reads the same APIs and renders finished reports. Agencies that want to own their data and build their own reporting go the Supermetrics route and accept the build cost. Agencies that want reports rather than pipelines buy AgencyAnalytics, and a few large agencies run both, with Supermetrics feeding the analysis and AgencyAnalytics producing the client deliverable.
Full AgencyAnalytics vs Supermetrics comparisonImplementation & onboarding
- Setup time
- The first client is genuinely a same-day exercise: create the client, authorize four or five OAuth connections, apply a channel template, and schedule delivery. Rolling an established roster over takes longer, typically a week or two of evenings for 20 clients, because every connection has to be authorized individually and each client's report needs a review against what they were previously sent.
- Learning curve
- Low. The editor is a widget grid and the mental model (client, source, widget, report, schedule) is small enough to hold in your head. The part that takes practice is discipline rather than skill: standardizing on two or three templates instead of hand-building a bespoke report per client, which is what determines whether the tool still saves time at 40 clients.
- Onboarding
- Self-serve with a free onboarding call included, plus a large help centre, a platform tour, and template library. Email and chat support are on every plan; Enterprise agreements add priority support and dedicated training.
- Migration notes
- Historical data is not imported from a previous reporting tool. Connectors backfill from the source APIs where the platform allows it, so most channels show history from day one, but anything you had manually annotated or blended elsewhere does not come across. Export or archive past client reports as PDFs before switching, and expect the first month to run in parallel with the old process while you confirm the numbers match. If you are on a legacy tier and considering a move to the current per-client plan, price both against your actual roster; the change is not automatically cheaper.
Platform, API & security
- Platforms
- Web applicationiOS and Android mobile appsBranded client portal on a custom domain
- API
- REST API included on every plan for pushing custom data and automating client provisioning, plus a Google Sheets integration used as the general-purpose escape hatch for unsupported sources. An MCP endpoint exposes client performance data to Claude, ChatGPT, and other AI assistants. Database connectors for warehouses such as Amazon Redshift are available as a paid add-on.
- Compliance
- GDPRCCPASOC 2
- Data residency
- Canadian company (Toronto) operating on North American cloud infrastructure; specific residency options are handled through Enterprise agreements.
- SSO
- Available on Enterprise agreements; granular custom permissions and per-client access scoping are included on the standard plan.
- Security notes
- Data access is read-only OAuth against each client's marketing accounts, revocable by the client at the source platform. Client users are scoped to their own accounts by permission, which matters because a reporting tool holds credentials-adjacent access to every client's ad spend and analytics.
Support & resources
- Channels
- Email supportLive chatFree onboarding callPriority support on Enterprise
- Documentation
- A substantial help centre with per-integration articles, plus a platform tour, template gallery, and KPI definition library that doubles as category education for junior staff.
- Community
- The company publishes an annual Agency Benchmarks Report and a large agency-operations blog, which has become a reference point in the agency community independent of the software itself.
Company
- Founded
- 2010
- Headquarters
- Toronto, Canada
- Ownership
- Independent and 100 percent employee-owned
- Founders
- Joe Kindness, Blake Acheson
- Employees
- ~115 (est. 2026), fully distributed
- Funding
- Bootstrapped; no venture funding raised.
Timeline
- 2010Founded in Toronto by Joe Kindness and Blake Acheson as My SEO Tool, a keyword rank tracker sold to agencies.
- 2014Rebranded to AgencyAnalytics as the product expanded from rank tracking into multi-channel client reporting.
- 2020Connector library and white-label client portal mature into the current shape; adoption accelerates among small agencies.
- 2023Custom dashboards, roll-up reporting, and goal tracking broaden the product beyond scheduled PDF reports.
- 2024Campaigns renamed Clients across the platform; user base passes 7,000 agencies covering roughly 150,000 client accounts.
- 2025AI report summaries, anomaly detection, trend forecasting, and industry benchmark comparisons added.
- 2026Pricing restructured from four tiers to one all-features plan at $20 per client per month; rank tracking becomes a paid add-on.
- 2026AI search tracking launches in July alongside an MCP endpoint that lets Claude and ChatGPT query client performance directly.
Integrations
- Google Ads
- Google Analytics 4
- Google Search Console
- Google Business Profile
- Meta Ads
- Facebook and Instagram
- LinkedIn Ads
- TikTok Ads
- Microsoft Advertising
- Amazon Ads
- Shopify
- BigCommerce
- Mailchimp
- ActiveCampaign
- Constant Contact
- Brevo
- Klaviyo
- CallRail
- CallTrackingMetrics
- Ahrefs
- Semrush
- Moz
- BrightLocal
- Birdeye
- AdRoll
- Bing Webmaster Tools
- Google Sheets
- Amazon Redshift
Frequently asked questions
12 questionsWhat is AgencyAnalytics used for?
It is used by marketing agencies to automate client reporting. You connect each client's marketing accounts (ads, analytics, search console, social, email, call tracking, ecommerce), build a report or dashboard from templates, brand it with your own logo and domain, and have it delivered to the client on a schedule. Clients can also log into a branded portal to see live dashboards between reports.
How much does AgencyAnalytics cost?
As of August 2026 there is one self-serve plan at $20 USD per client per month billed annually, roughly $25 billed monthly, with every feature included and unlimited data sources, reports, staff users, and client users. Rank tracking ($41.67 per month per 500 keywords) and AI search tracking ($20.83 per month per 250 credits) are separate add-ons. Agencies with 25 or more clients are directed to a custom Enterprise quote.
Does AgencyAnalytics have a free plan or a free trial?
There is no free plan. There is a 14-day free trial with no credit card required, and a 30-day money-back guarantee if you subscribe and change your mind. If a permanent free tier is a hard requirement, Looker Studio is the realistic alternative in this category.
What happened to the Freelancer, Agency, and Agency Pro plans?
They were replaced in 2026 by a single all-features plan priced per client. Agencies that subscribed before the change are generally still billed on their legacy tier. This is worth checking on your own account, because the vendor's pricing FAQ still references plan-specific limits (such as dashboard counts and multi-account connections) that no longer apply to the current plan.
Is a client the same thing as a campaign?
Yes. What the platform now calls a Client was previously called a Campaign. It represents one business relationship, can hold as many integrations and reports as you need, and is the unit you are billed on. Multi-location businesses are usually set up as one client per location with a roll-up report on top, which does affect the bill.
Is AgencyAnalytics better than Looker Studio?
Not on capability or price, since Looker Studio is free and more flexible. AgencyAnalytics wins on time and presentation: connectors that are maintained for you, templates you can apply across a roster in bulk, white-label branding on your own domain, and a client login portal. If you have someone technical who enjoys maintaining connectors and does not need client logins, Looker Studio is the cheaper answer.
Can AgencyAnalytics blend data from different sources?
Partially. Custom metrics let you build formulas from connected metrics, and cross-channel tables put multiple sources in one view. What it cannot do is genuine data modelling: no SQL, no arbitrary joins, and custom metrics that require filtering or segmenting a source before aggregating are outside its reach. That ceiling is the most common reason larger agencies move to a warehouse plus a BI tool.
How many integrations does AgencyAnalytics have?
85+ marketing data sources, spread across PPC, SEO, social, analytics, local, call tracking, email, and ecommerce, plus a Google Sheets integration for anything unsupported and warehouse database connectors as a paid add-on. Call tracking coverage (CallRail, CallTrackingMetrics, CallSource, and others) is unusually deep for the category.
Does it still do keyword rank tracking?
Yes, but as a paid add-on rather than part of the base subscription: $41.67 per month per 500 keywords billed annually, covering weekly desktop and mobile positions on Google and Bing with local and multi-language options. This matters when comparing headline prices against tools that bundle rank tracking, since the product began life as a rank tracker.
Who owns AgencyAnalytics?
It is independent. The company was founded in Toronto in 2010 by Joe Kindness and Blake Acheson, took no venture funding, and describes itself as 100 percent employee-owned with a distributed team of around 115 people. That is worth noting in a category where several competitors have been acquired or repriced under new investors.
What is the most common complaint about AgencyAnalytics?
Integration reliability. Reviewers consistently report connections dropping and needing manual reauthorization, which is a real operational risk when reports send themselves. The practical mitigations are to set metric alerts that would fire on a zeroed-out source, and to use report approvals so a person glances at each report before a client does.
Can clients log in and see their own data?
Yes. Client users get their own logins to a portal on the agency's custom domain, scoped by permission to their own accounts, with no charge for the seats. This is one of the clearer differences from generic dashboard tools, where sharing usually means a link or a PDF rather than an ongoing branded destination.
Editorial verdict
AgencyAnalytics is the default small-agency reporting tool for defensible reasons: it is built around the client account rather than the dashboard, it white-labels properly down to the domain and the sending address, it charges nothing for seats, and the 2026 move to a single $20-per-client plan removed the old irritation of paying more to unlock features rather than capacity. For an agency currently losing three or four days a month to exports and slide decks, the payback is measured in weeks. The honest limits are worth stating plainly: it renders API data rather than modelling it, custom metrics fall over when a calculation needs filtering, report layout is a grid rather than a canvas, integration disconnections are a recurring operational annoyance, and rank tracking now costs extra despite being the original product. Buy it if the job is producing many branded client reports reliably at a predictable per-client cost; look at a warehouse and a BI tool instead if the job is answering questions the connectors were never built to answer.
Written by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Awards, when shown, are judged against the published criteria in our methodology.