Porter Metrics
Marketing data connectors for Looker Studio, Sheets, Power BI, and BigQuery, priced per connected account from $15 a month
Porter Metrics is a no-code marketing data connector that pipes advertising, social, analytics, ecommerce, and CRM data into reporting destinations rather than displaying it itself. It connects 26 marketing platforms (including Meta Ads, Google Ads, GA4, TikTok Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Microsoft Ads, Shopify, Amazon Seller, HubSpot, Klaviyo, Search Console, and Google Business Profile) and delivers them to Looker Studio (now Data Studio), Google Sheets, Power BI, a customer-owned BigQuery project, Slack, Zapier, and AI chat clients through an MCP server. Every destination, plus automatic cross-source data blending, an AI custom-field builder, alerting, and roughly 60 Looker Studio templates, is included on every plan. Pricing is charged per connected data source account, starting at $15 per account per month ($12.50 billed annually), with a free forever plan covering three accounts on a 30-day lookback and a 14-day unlimited trial. The company was founded by a Colombian team and is registered in Lewes, Delaware.
Overview
Porter Metrics is not a reporting product. It is the layer underneath one. Almost everything else in this category, AgencyAnalytics, DashThis, Whatagraph, Swydo, Databox, ships a dashboard and a client portal and bundles connectors in to feed it. Porter ships only the connectors and then hands the data to a tool you already have, usually Looker Studio. If you want a white-label client login, a branded PDF deliverable, an annotation workflow, and a per-client billing model, Porter does not have any of those and is not trying to. If what you actually need is for Meta Ads, TikTok, and Shopify to show up correctly in the Looker Studio report you already built, that is the whole product.
That distinction determines who should buy it. The tools Porter genuinely competes with are Supermetrics, Windsor.ai, Dataslayer, and Power My Analytics, all of which sell the same thing: an API layer between marketing platforms and a destination. Inside that group Porter's argument is packaging rather than breadth. Supermetrics' entry plan gives you one destination, one user, and three data sources for 49 euros a month, and each additional destination or user is a separate charge. Porter charges for one thing, the number of individual accounts you connect, and every destination, every user, blending, templates, and alerting come with it. That is a materially simpler bill for a small business, and it is why the product reads as cheap even though the per-account rate is not especially low.
The trade for that packaging is connector count, and the company is unusually blunt about it. Porter's own published product review states that having 25 integrations against 150-plus on Supermetrics, 325-plus on Windsor, and 590 on Funnel is the number one reason prospects who evaluate the tool decide not to buy. The connector page listed 26 as of August 2026. There is no Salesforce connector, no Go High Level, no BigCommerce or Magento, no Tableau, Snowflake, Redshift, or S3 destination, and no SQL editor. If your reporting depends on any of those, the evaluation ends there, and the correct answer is a broader pipeline tool.
The company itself is small and independently held. Porter Metrics was built by a Colombian team from Manizales, Caldas, and is registered in Lewes, Delaware; the company describes itself as founded in 2020 with roughly ten people, mostly data engineers, though the Techstars directory and its LinkedIn profile both list 2018 for an earlier incarnation of the project. Funding is about US$400,000 from angel investors and the Techstars Boulder 2021 cohort, with no institutional venture round announced. It reports over 1,600 active customers in 60-plus countries. The consequences of that size are visible in both directions: onboarding calls and a direct Slack channel with the founders are available to anyone including free-plan users, and there is no SOC 2 Type 2 certification, which the company says it expects during 2026.
Best for
Small marketing teams, ecommerce brands, and agencies that already report in Looker Studio, Google Sheets, or Power BI, whose data lives in the mainstream ad, social, ecommerce, and CRM platforms Porter covers, and who want cross-channel blending and a warehouse without hiring anyone to build one. It is at its strongest for a business connecting somewhere between three and twenty accounts.
Not the right fit for
- Agencies that need a white-label client portal, client logins, branded PDF deliverables, or per-client billing. Porter has none of these; it feeds a dashboard, it is not one, and AgencyAnalytics or DashThis is the right shape of product for that job.
- Teams whose stack includes Salesforce, Go High Level, BigCommerce, Magento, Oracle, or any of the several hundred non-marketing sources a general pipeline tool covers. The company states plainly that connector count is the single most common reason prospects walk away.
- Anyone whose destination is Tableau, Snowflake, Redshift, Amazon S3, or an FTP drop. Porter writes to Looker Studio, Google Sheets, Power BI, BigQuery, Slack, and Zapier and nothing else.
- Organisations with a hard SOC 2 Type 2 requirement or strict EU data residency obligations. As of August 2026 Porter holds no SOC 2 Type 2 certification and its own documentation states it is not GDPR compliant, offering NDAs and customer-owned BigQuery as substitutes.
- Data analysts who want to write SQL against the collection layer. There is no SQL editor anywhere in Porter; modelling is done through natural language, visual builders, and AI, and the escape hatch is to land the data in your own BigQuery project and query it there.
How it works
- 1
You sign in with the Google account you use for Looker Studio and connect a data source by OAuth. Access is read-only and revocable from your account at any time. The unit that matters for both pricing and configuration is the account: one Meta ad account, one GA4 property, one Shopify store, one HubSpot portal. Ten Google Business Profile locations count as a single account.
- 2
You then build a connection, which is where Porter differs from a plain connector. A connection can hold several accounts of the same source (a dozen client Meta ad accounts consolidated into one table) or several different sources at once. When you select more than one platform, Porter maps the shared fields automatically: dates at day, week, month, quarter, and year, campaign names matched against GA4 UTM campaigns, ad set and creative names, country and region, and spend, impressions, clicks, conversions, and revenue. No join is written and no schema is defined.
- 3
For sources with hard API rate limits (HubSpot, Shopify, ActiveCampaign, Amazon Seller, large Google Business Profile accounts) Porter stores and backfills the data into its own managed BigQuery layer rather than querying live, which is what stops those sources from timing out or failing partway through a long date range. Everything else is queried live against the source API, with storage available as an opt-in for speed and stability.
- 4
You send the connection to a destination. Looker Studio is the primary one and Porter connects through the Data Studio API, so it can create the report with the data already loaded rather than making you configure a community connector by hand; roughly 60 templates install in one click this way. The same connection also writes to Google Sheets, Power BI, and a BigQuery dataset in your own Google Cloud project, all included in the same subscription with no per-destination fee.
- 5
On top of that sit the analysis features. A natural-language custom field builder lets you describe a metric ("cost per lead excluding campaigns with brand in the name") and turns it into a formula or regex that is written as a column into the connection, and custom dimensions can parse a campaign naming convention into separate Country, Platform, and Funnel Stage columns. A visual, node-based alert builder runs a query on a schedule or on a threshold, optionally passes it through an AI summary prompt, and posts to Slack or out through Zapier. An MCP server at mcp.portermetrics.com exposes the same connected accounts read-only to Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini at no extra charge.
Feature breakdown
25 features in 4 modulesConnectors and data collection
Narrow by design: 26 marketing platforms covered deeply rather than several hundred covered thinly.- 26 marketing connectors
- Ten paid media sources (Meta Ads, Google Ads, TikTok Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Reddit Ads, Pinterest Ads, Microsoft Ads, Apple Ads, X Ads, Google DV360), GA4, six social sources, Shopify and Amazon Seller, four CRM and email tools, Search Console, Google Business Profile, and Google Sheets. That is the entire catalogue as published in August 2026.
- Multi-account consolidation in one connection
- Dozens of accounts of the same source can be blended into a single unified table rather than one data source per account, which is the specific mechanic that makes agency and multi-brand reporting workable without stacking thirty Looker Studio data sources.
- Full field granularity
- Every connector exposes the metrics and dimensions the source API offers rather than a pre-cooked subset, with a public field-level reference per connector. Shopify breaks out new versus repeat customers and sales; HubSpot goes down to SQL, pipeline, and closed-revenue level by acquisition source.
- Built-in warehousing and backfill for rate-limited APIs
- HubSpot, Shopify, ActiveCampaign, Amazon Seller, and large Google Business Profile accounts are stored and backfilled into a managed BigQuery layer automatically, which is the fix for the sources that most reliably break live connectors. No warehouse setup, schema design, or SQL is required from the user.
- Public data connectors
- Instagram Public Data and Facebook Public Data pull metrics from any public business profile without needing account access, which covers competitor tracking and monitoring brand accounts you do not administer.
- Google Sheets as a source
- The documented workaround for anything Porter does not connect to natively. A sheet becomes a data source, and a mapping feature lets its columns be combined with native connector fields, so offline costs, targets, or an unsupported platform's export can be blended with live data.
Destinations
Every destination is included on every plan, which is the pricing argument as much as it is a feature list.- Looker Studio via the Data Studio API
- Rather than a community connector you configure by hand, Porter creates the report through the Data Studio API with the data already loaded. This is the difference between a template you copy and repoint and a template that arrives populated.
- Google Sheets
- Direct scheduled export for teams that model in spreadsheets or need a raw table to hand to finance, with the same blended output as any other destination.
- Power BI
- Native destination on all plans, including the free one, which is unusual at this price point; most competitors treat a second destination as a paid upgrade or an enterprise feature.
- BigQuery in your own Google Cloud project
- Data is written to a dataset you own rather than one the vendor holds, so the warehouse and its contents remain yours if you cancel. The free plan writes to BigQuery too, capped at a 30-day window; paid plans have no date-range cap.
- Slack and Zapier
- Slack is a native destination for alerts and AI summaries. Zapier routes the same outputs onward to email, WhatsApp, or anything else in its catalogue, which is how a report reaches a channel Porter does not support directly.
- MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini
- A hosted read-only MCP endpoint that exposes already-connected accounts to any MCP-compatible AI client, included at no extra cost on every plan including the free tier. It cannot change campaigns or spend money; it queries.
Blending, modelling, and templates
The layer that separates Porter from a plain API connector, and the reason it can produce a cross-channel table without SQL.- Automatic cross-source blending
- Selecting several platforms in one connection produces a single unified marketing data model. Dates, campaign names, UTM parameters, ad structure, geography, spend, impressions, clicks, conversions, and revenue are mapped without a join, a table schema, or a field-mapping exercise. It only works across Porter's own connectors.
- UTM attribution through GA4
- Ad platform campaign data is matched against GA4 UTM campaigns so conversions can be counted from one source of truth instead of accepting each platform's self-reported numbers, which is the specific problem most cross-channel reports exist to solve.
- AI custom field builder
- Describe a metric or dimension in plain language, reference existing fields with an @ mention, and Porter writes the formula or regular expression, previews the values, and writes the result as a column into the connection. Fields stay editable afterwards rather than being frozen into a schema.
- Campaign naming convention parsing
- Custom dimensions can split a structured campaign name into separate Country, Platform, Funnel Stage, and Creative Type columns, which turns a naming convention that already exists into reportable dimensions without renaming anything upstream.
- Roughly 60 Looker Studio templates
- Multi-source templates organised by use case (paid media across five platforms, Shopify plus ad spend, cross-network social, GA4 plus ads, HubSpot or Klaviyo plus marketing performance), installed in one click through the Data Studio API with live data attached and fully editable afterwards.
- Goal and target import
- Targets, OKRs, and budget numbers that live nowhere but a spreadsheet come in through the Google Sheets source and sit alongside actuals in the same blended table, which is the usual missing half of a performance-against-plan report.
Automation, monitoring, and account administration
Scheduled and threshold-based monitoring, plus the administrative model, which is deliberately thin.- Visual node-based alert builder
- Four node types configured in natural language: a trigger (a daily time, a weekly day, or a short interval), a query (metrics, dimensions, filters, date range, with period-over-period comparison added automatically), an optional AI analysis prompt, and a destination.
- Behaviour-based alerts
- Alerts can fire on a metric dropping or spiking rather than only on a schedule, which is the difference between a dashboard someone has to remember to open and a system that tells you spend broke pattern on a Saturday.
- AI-written summaries
- An analysis node can carry an instruction such as summarising which campaigns are underperforming and why, so what lands in Slack is prose about the numbers rather than the numbers alone.
- Unlimited users and reports
- No seat charge of any kind, on any plan. Cost scales purely with connected accounts, which is a genuine structural advantage over per-user competitors where an extra colleague costs $37 to $124 a month.
- Unlimited historical data on paid plans
- Paid plans carry no lookback cap, so a three-year trend is queryable where the source retains it. The free plan is capped at 30 days, which is the single limit that defines the free tier.
- Read-only, revocable source access
- Connections authorise through OAuth with read scopes and can be revoked from the Porter account at any time. Porter states it does not transform, sample, or reinterpret source data, so figures should reconcile against the platform's own manager.
- Thin governance layer
- Worth stating as a feature limit rather than burying it: there is no published SAML single sign-on, no role-based permission model, and no audit log. Authentication is a Google account, and the governance answer the company offers is customer-owned BigQuery plus an NDA.
Use cases
4 documentedEcommerce brand measuring true ROAS
Meta reports one conversion count, Google reports another, Shopify reports actual revenue, and nobody can produce a single number for blended return because joining them means either a spreadsheet rebuilt every Monday or hiring someone who writes SQL.
Four accounts (Meta Ads, Google Ads, GA4, Shopify) connect as one blended connection at $40 a month monthly, or $33.33 billed annually. Total spend, revenue split by new versus repeat customer, blended ROAS, CAC, and MER land in one Looker Studio table with GA4 UTMs as the shared attribution key.
Small agency already invested in Looker Studio
Twelve client dashboards were built in Looker Studio over two years and look good. The problem is that every non-Google source arrives through a different paid connector, the bill is opaque, and the Shopify and HubSpot connections fail on long date ranges.
Twenty connected accounts sit at a flat $100 a month ($83 annually), the existing reports keep their layouts, and the rate-limited sources move onto Porter's managed warehouse so they stop timing out. The client portal problem is untouched, because Porter does not solve it.
B2B marketer proving pipeline contribution
Leadership wants cost per closed deal by campaign, not cost per MQL. The ad data is in Meta and LinkedIn, the pipeline is in HubSpot, and the HubSpot API rate limits break every live connector that has been tried.
HubSpot connects with automatic storage and backfill and reports down to SQL, pipeline, and closed-revenue level by acquisition source, blended against LinkedIn and Meta spend. An AI custom field defines cost per qualified lead excluding brand campaigns without anyone writing a formula.
Multi-location business reporting on Google Business Profile
Forty locations each generate local search impressions, calls, and direction requests. Pulling them individually would mean forty data sources and a pricing model that punishes every one of them.
Google Business Profile is billed at ten locations per account, so forty locations cost four accounts, roughly $40 a month monthly. The managed warehouse absorbs the API volume that would otherwise make a live connection unusable at that scale.
Pricing
from $0 on the free forever plan (3 accounts, 30-day lookback); $15 per account per month thereafter, or $12.50 billed annuallyCharged per connected data source account, where an account means one ad account, one analytics property, one business profile, one store, or one CRM portal, with ten Google Business Profile locations counting as a single account. There are no seat charges, no per-destination charges, and no premium connectors: every destination, blending, templates, custom fields, alerts, and the MCP server are included on every plan including the free one. The per-account rate falls as the account count rises. Annual billing gives two months free, roughly 16.6 percent.
| Plan | Price | Includes |
|---|---|---|
| Free forever | $0 per month |
Every trial ends here automatically rather than in a paywall, which makes Porter one of the very few products in this category with a genuine permanent free tier. |
| 1 to 2 accounts | $15 per account per month ($12.50 per account billed annually) |
|
| 3 to 12 accounts | $39.99 to $96 per month total, falling from $13.33 to $8 per account |
Note the flat spot: three, four, and five accounts all cost about $40 a month, so a three-account setup should usually just add the fourth and fifth. |
| 13 to 20 accounts | $100 per month flat ($83 billed annually) |
|
| 21 to 199 accounts | $105 to about $418 per month, at $5 down to $2.10 per account |
This is where the per-account model starts working against you relative to competitors that charge per platform type and include a generous account allowance. |
| 200-plus accounts and BigQuery Custom | From $400 per month, or from about $1,000 per month for the custom BigQuery arrangement quoted |
|
Add-ons
- Custom connector development (Included only on plans from about $1,000 per month): The stated route for a platform Porter does not cover natively. Below that threshold the answer is the Google Sheets import workaround.
- Free report setup and Looker Studio training ($0): Porter builds or fixes reports and trains the team at no charge, with premium templates and custom reporting offered on annual plans. It is a support practice rather than a paid service tier.
- BigQuery storage and query charges (Usage-based, billed by Google not Porter): The BigQuery destination writes into your own Google Cloud project, so the warehouse bill sits with Google. At small-business volumes this is commonly a few dollars a month, but it is a real line item.
Billing notes
- The billing unit is an account, not a platform. Ten client Meta ad accounts is ten accounts even though it is one connector, which is the detail that most often makes a quote larger than expected.
- Ten Google Business Profile locations count as one account, which is a genuine and unusual discount for multi-location and franchise businesses.
- Annual billing is ten months for twelve, roughly 16.6 percent off, applied at every point on the curve.
- Refunds are given on requests made within fourteen days of purchase, with the company saying it may re-evaluate exceptional cases beyond that.
- There are no seat fees, no per-destination fees, and no premium connectors, so the published per-account rate is the whole software bill. The one cost that sits outside it is Google's own BigQuery charge if you use that destination.
- The pricing shape changed. Older reviews describing a $15 Starter tier with three sources and a $49 Professional tier with BigQuery no longer match the live pricing page, which is a per-account curve with a free forever plan. Check the current page rather than a secondhand comparison table.
Value assessment: The honest way to price Porter is per connector against the two products it actually competes with, and the answer changes direction depending on how many accounts you have. For a single business connecting Meta Ads, Google Ads, and GA4 once each, Porter costs $39.99 a month and includes every destination, unlimited users, blending, and templates. Supermetrics' Starter plan at 49 euros a month covers three data sources but gives you one destination, one user, and three accounts per source, so the moment a second person or a second destination is involved Porter is meaningfully cheaper for the same coverage. Windsor.ai's Basic plan at $23 a month monthly ($19 annually) covers three data source types and up to seventy-five accounts, which at three accounts is cheaper than Porter and comes with a far larger connector catalogue. Push the count up and the picture inverts twice. At twenty accounts Porter is a flat $100 a month, against Windsor Standard at $118 ($99 annually) for seven source types and Supermetrics Growth at 199 euros for seven sources, two users, and seven accounts per source: Porter wins clearly. At sixty accounts across five platforms Porter charges $4 per account, about $240 a month, while Windsor Standard covers seventy-five accounts across seven source types for $99 annually, and Porter loses badly. The rule that falls out of this is specific: Porter is the best value in this category between roughly three and twenty-five connected accounts across a handful of platforms, and it is the wrong pricing model for an agency running dozens of accounts of the same source. Add the free forever plan, which no direct competitor of this shape matches in permanence, and the entry risk is close to zero either way.
Strengths & limitations
Strengths
- One pricing dimension. You pay for connected accounts and nothing else: no per-destination charge, no seat fees, no premium connectors, no feature gating between plans, which is a genuinely simpler bill than Supermetrics or most of the reporting suites.
- Automatic cross-source blending with no schema work. Dates, campaign names, UTMs, spend, and revenue are unified across connected platforms without a join or a field-mapping exercise, which is the step that normally requires SQL or a data person.
- Managed warehousing and backfill for the sources that break live connectors, specifically HubSpot, Shopify, ActiveCampaign, Amazon Seller, and large Google Business Profile accounts, with no warehouse to configure.
- A real permanent free tier: three accounts with every feature and every destination, limited only by a 30-day lookback, plus a 14-day unlimited trial that downgrades to it automatically rather than expiring into a paywall.
- BigQuery writes into the customer's own Google Cloud project, so the data and the warehouse remain yours if the subscription ends, which is a stronger ownership position than most vendors offer at this price.
- Support that is disproportionate to the price: free onboarding and setup calls with no minimum plan, free report building and Looker Studio training, and a direct Slack channel to the developers and founders.
Limitations
- Connector breadth is the defining weakness and the company says so itself, calling 25 integrations against 150-plus on Supermetrics and 325-plus on Windsor the number one reason prospects who evaluate Porter decide not to buy. There is no Salesforce and no Go High Level connector, both on the roadmap and neither shipped.
- Destination support is narrow. Looker Studio, Google Sheets, Power BI, BigQuery, Slack, and Zapier is the complete list. No Tableau, no Snowflake, no Redshift, no Amazon S3, no FTP.
- No SOC 2 Type 2 certification as of August 2026, which the company states is expected during the year, and its own documentation says the product is not GDPR compliant. For a European team with data residency obligations or any buyer with a procurement checklist, that is a hard stop, and NDAs plus customer-owned BigQuery are the offered substitutes rather than a fix.
- No SQL editor and no manual join control. Everything is modelled through natural language, visual builders, and AI, which is fast for a marketer and limiting for an analyst who wants exact control over metric definitions and transformations; verified reviewers describe complex bespoke modelling as requiring workarounds.
- Performance is bounded by Looker Studio itself. Porter reduces the load by blending and storing upstream, but the destination is still Google's renderer, and verified G2 reviewers report slow dashboard loading and data taking a while to appear. Porter can make a report faster; it cannot make Looker Studio fast.
- The per-account pricing model penalises exactly the agency profile the marketing targets. Dozens of accounts of the same platform accumulate charges that a competitor billing per platform type with a large account allowance does not, and the curve does not flatten enough to compensate until very high volumes.
- A ten-person company means slower feature development than the larger competitors, which the company acknowledges, and reviewers also report occasional connection issues, repeated login prompts within a session, templates needing more polish, and support response times that could be faster.
Head-to-head comparisons
6 alternativesPorter Metrics vs Supermetrics
from €49 per month (Starter), or €39 per month billed yearlyThe direct head-to-head, and the cleanest way to see what Porter is. Both sell an API layer between marketing platforms and a destination. Supermetrics wins on catalogue with 150-plus connectors against Porter's 26, and on enterprise credentials with SOC 2, SAML SSO, data residency controls, Snowflake and BigQuery warehouse destinations, and a documented data API. Porter wins on packaging and on the modelling layer: Supermetrics Starter at 49 euros a month buys one destination, one user, and three data sources, and each further destination, user, or ad account is a separate charge, while Porter's $39.99 for three accounts includes every destination, unlimited users, automatic blending, alerting, and 60 templates. The decision rule is unusually crisp. If every platform you report on is inside Porter's 26, Porter is cheaper, simpler, and does more of the modelling for you. If even one is not, or if procurement wants a SOC 2 report, Supermetrics is the answer and the comparison is over.
Full Porter Metrics vs Supermetrics comparisonPorter Metrics vs Looker Studio
from Free, unlimited reports and viewers; Pro from about $9 per licensed user per monthNot competitors; two halves of one deliverable. Looker Studio is the free canvas that draws the charts and has no way of its own to read Meta Ads, TikTok, Shopify, or HubSpot. Porter is one of the connector products that fills that gap, and it fills it more thoroughly than most because it connects through the Data Studio API to create reports with data already loaded, and because it blends across sources before the data arrives so the report is not doing five-table joins at render time. Buying Porter does not remove any of Looker Studio's own weaknesses: there is still no client concept, no version history, no report-grade PDF, and the page still renders at Google's speed. Price the pair honestly. A free canvas plus $40 a month of connectors is a $40-a-month reporting stack, and it should be compared against a $50-a-month reporting suite on that basis rather than described as free.
Full Porter Metrics vs Looker Studio comparisonPorter Metrics vs AgencyAnalytics
from $20 USD per client per month billed annually (roughly $25 billed monthly)The clearest illustration of the connector-versus-suite distinction, and the two are not substitutes despite sharing a category. AgencyAnalytics is a complete client reporting business in a box: 80-plus connectors, white labelling on your own domain, client logins, automated scheduling, staff and client permissions, and templates that apply across accounts, billed at about $20 per client per month. Porter supplies data and stops. An agency that wants clients to log into something branded should buy AgencyAnalytics and not think about Porter. An agency that has already built its client experience in Looker Studio, wants to keep the design control that gives, and only needs the data to arrive correctly, should buy Porter and will pay considerably less. The trap is buying Porter expecting the portal, because it does not exist and is not on the roadmap.
Full Porter Metrics vs AgencyAnalytics comparisonPorter Metrics vs Funnel
from About $300 per month on Starter, billed annuallySame layer of the stack, opposite ends of the market. Funnel is a governed marketing data platform with roughly 590 sources, real transformation and currency harmonisation, SOC 2 and GDPR posture, and export into any warehouse or BI tool, starting around $300 a month. Porter covers 26 sources, blends them automatically, writes to six destinations, and starts at $15 per account. If you need broad source coverage, auditable transformation rules, or a compliance document, Funnel is the correct product and Porter cannot substitute for it at any price. If your data is entirely mainstream marketing platforms and the requirement is a Looker Studio report that reconciles, Funnel is roughly an order of magnitude more capability and cost than the job requires. Both leave the dashboard to something else, which is what makes them comparable at all.
Full Porter Metrics vs Funnel comparisonPorter Metrics vs DashThis
from $44 per month on the Individual plan billed yearly ($54 billed monthly) for 3 dashboards and 15 sourcesA useful price-point comparison because they land near each other and do entirely different things. DashThis is a templated client reporting product starting around $44 a month billed yearly for three dashboards and fifteen data sources, with white labelling, scheduled delivery, and commentary built in; the dashboards themselves are its output. Porter at roughly the same monthly figure gives you no dashboard at all, just correct data flowing into whatever you already use, plus a warehouse and alerting DashThis does not attempt. The choice is really about where you want your design control. DashThis is faster to a finished client report and constrains how it looks; Porter assumes you have already decided how your reports look in Looker Studio or Power BI and only want the plumbing fixed.
Full Porter Metrics vs DashThis comparisonPorter Metrics vs Databox
from $0 (Free), then $64 per month billed annually (Analyst)Databox is the packaged in-house alternative: connectors included in the subscription, pre-built metric templates, goal tracking, alerts, a mobile app, and a free tier, from about $64 a month billed annually on the entry paid plan. It watches your numbers for you inside its own interface. Porter has alerting too, and a free plan that is arguably more generous in features if narrower in lookback, but it will never show you a chart, because rendering is somebody else's job. Choose Databox if you want an opinionated dashboard product with the data problem solved invisibly. Choose Porter if you have already committed to Looker Studio or Power BI, want the data in a warehouse you own, and would rather not run a second reporting surface in parallel.
Full Porter Metrics vs Databox comparisonImplementation & onboarding
- Setup time
- Under an hour for a first working report. Sign in with the Google account you already use for Looker Studio, authorise a source by OAuth, select the accounts, and install a template through the Data Studio API with data already loaded. A blended multi-source connection with custom fields and a naming-convention parser is more like half a day. A BigQuery destination writing into your own Google Cloud project takes longer only because of Google's side of the setup.
- Learning curve
- Low for a marketer, and deliberately so, because the modelling interfaces are natural language and visual builders rather than SQL. The concepts that take time are what counts as an account for billing, when a source should be switched to stored rather than live, and how the automatic blend has decided to map fields when two platforms disagree about what a campaign is. Analysts used to writing their own joins will find the absence of a SQL editor the hardest adjustment.
- Onboarding
- Self-serve with a 14-day unlimited trial and no card, but the notable part is that the assisted path is free and unmetered. Onboarding calls are available on any plan including the free one, Porter will build or fix reports for you at no charge, and annual customers are offered custom reporting and training. A direct Slack channel with the developers and founders is part of the standard offer rather than an enterprise perk.
- Migration notes
- Moving in from Supermetrics, Windsor, or a hand-built connector means rebuilding data sources inside existing Looker Studio reports, since field names will not match one to one and calculated fields referencing old field names need rewriting. Budget an afternoon per non-trivial report rather than a swap. Moving out is easier than most: if you use the BigQuery destination, the data already sits in your own Google Cloud project and survives cancellation. The genuinely hard exit is not the data, it is the automatic blending, because a connection Porter blended for you becomes a set of joins someone has to write by hand elsewhere.
Platform, API & security
- Platforms
- Web application at app.portermetrics.comLooker Studio (Data Studio) connector via the Data Studio APIGoogle Sheets destinationPower BI connectorBigQuery destination into a customer-owned Google Cloud projectHosted MCP server at mcp.portermetrics.com for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and other MCP clients
- API
- No public REST API for extracting data from Porter itself is published. The programmatic routes are the BigQuery destination, where data lands in tables in your own Google Cloud project and can be queried by anything, the Google Sheets destination, Zapier for routing alert output to around 5,000 apps, and the read-only MCP server for AI clients. Custom integration development exists but only for customers on plans from about $1,000 a month.
- Compliance
- No SOC 2 Type 2 certification as of August 2026; the company states it is expected during 2026The company's own documentation states the product is not GDPR compliant, and flags this specifically for European teams with data residency requirementsNDAs offered in place of certificationRead-only OAuth access to source platforms, revocable by the customer at any timeCustomer-owned BigQuery project offered as the data-control answer, so warehoused data sits in infrastructure the customer holds
- Data residency
- No published data residency or region-selection controls. The one mechanism that gives a customer control over where warehoused data lives is the BigQuery destination, since the dataset sits in a Google Cloud project the customer owns and configures.
- SSO
- Not published. Authentication is through a Google account, and no SAML single sign-on, role-based permission model, or audit log is advertised.
- Security notes
- Source connections are read-only and the MCP server is explicitly read-only, so the product cannot alter campaigns or spend. Porter states it does not transform, sample, or reinterpret source data, meaning reported figures should reconcile against each platform's own manager. The gap for a security reviewer is not the access model, it is the absence of a certification, an audit log, an SSO story, and a permissions model, all of which are reasonable to expect from a ten-person company and unreasonable to ignore if your procurement process asks for them.
Support & resources
- Channels
- Live chat on every plan including the free forever planEmail supportFree onboarding and setup calls with no minimum planUnlimited calls, including calls booked directly with the foundersA direct Slack channel with developers and foundersFree report building, fixing, and Looker Studio training
- Documentation
- A help centre with setup tutorials, a field-level documentation reference listing every metric and dimension exposed by each connector, a large tutorial library covering Looker Studio and BigQuery technique as well as the product itself, and a YouTube channel. The site is published in English, Spanish, and Portuguese.
- Community
- No large independent user forum, which is the usual consequence of a small vendor. The practical substitute is unusually direct access to the team, and reviewers do note that support response times can be slow despite the generous channels on offer, which is what a ten-person company looks like from the outside.
Company
- Founded
- 2020
- Headquarters
- Lewes, Delaware, United States, with the team based in Manizales, Caldas, Colombia
- Ownership
- Independent, angel and accelerator backed
- Founders
- Juan Jose Bello, Mateo Gomez, Carlos Alexis Gomez
- Employees
- ~10 to 16 (2026)
- Funding
- About US$400,000 from angel investors and the Techstars Boulder 2021 cohort, per the company's own March 2026 statement. Earlier Colombian press reported the Techstars investment at US$120,000 alongside a US$250,000 angel round. No institutional venture round has been announced.
Funding history
| Round | Amount | Year | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Angel | About $250K | 2021 | Reported by Colombian business press; the exact close date is not separately published. |
| Techstars Boulder accelerator | About $120K | 2021 | The company puts total funding at roughly US$400,000 across angels and Techstars combined. |
Timeline
- 2018The project's earliest incarnation in Manizales, Caldas, Colombia, built by Juan Jose Bello, Mateo Gomez, and Carlos Alexis Gomez to automate social media reporting. Techstars' own company directory and the company's LinkedIn profile both list 2018 as the founding year.
- 2020The year the company itself gives as its founding, with Google Data Studio connectors as the first commercial product and a US entity registered in Lewes, Delaware.
- 2021Joins the Techstars Boulder cohort; total funding across Techstars and angel investors reaches roughly US$400,000, and no institutional round follows.
- 2022Colombian press reports over 1,200 customers across 60 countries and annual revenue above US$500,000, with the product still centred on Looker Studio connectors.
- 2025Destination coverage broadens beyond Looker Studio and Google Sheets to Power BI, and automatic storage and backfill is introduced for rate-limited APIs such as HubSpot, Shopify, and Amazon Seller.
- 2026A BigQuery destination writing into the customer's own Google Cloud project ships, marked new on the site through August 2026, bringing no-code warehousing to every plan including the free one.
- 2026In May, a hosted MCP server at mcp.portermetrics.com opens read-only access to connected accounts from Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and other MCP clients, included at no extra cost on every plan.
- 2026Pricing is restructured to a per-account curve with a free forever plan (3 accounts, 30-day lookback), and Celerio launches as a separate chat-driven execution product built on the same integrations. Customer count is reported at 1,600-plus across 60-plus countries.
Integrations
- Meta Ads
- Google Ads
- Google Analytics 4
- TikTok Ads
- LinkedIn Ads
- Microsoft Ads
- Pinterest Ads
- Google Display and Video 360
- Shopify
- Amazon Seller
- HubSpot
- Klaviyo
- Google Search Console
- Google Business Profile
Frequently asked questions
13 questionsWhat is Porter Metrics used for?
Porter Metrics is used to get marketing data out of ad, social, ecommerce, and CRM platforms and into a reporting tool. It connects 26 sources including Meta Ads, Google Ads, GA4, TikTok Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Shopify, Amazon Seller, HubSpot, Klaviyo, Search Console, and Google Business Profile, blends them into one cross-channel table automatically, and delivers the result to Looker Studio, Google Sheets, Power BI, a BigQuery project you own, Slack, Zapier, or an AI chat client through MCP. It does not display data itself: the dashboard is always somewhere else.
How much does Porter Metrics cost?
It is priced per connected data source account, not per plan tier. One account is $15 a month ($12.50 billed annually), three accounts are $39.99, five to twelve accounts are $8 each, thirteen to twenty accounts are a flat $100 a month ($83 annually), and the rate falls to $5 and below above that, reaching $2 per account at 200-plus. Annual billing is ten months for twelve, roughly 16.6 percent off. Every destination, unlimited users, blending, templates, alerting, and the MCP server are included at every level, so the per-account rate is the entire software bill.
Does Porter Metrics have a free plan?
Yes, and it is a real one. The free forever plan covers three connected data source accounts with every feature and every destination, including BigQuery and the MCP server, limited only by a 30-day data lookback window. Every new account starts on a 14-day unlimited trial with no credit card and is downgraded to the free plan automatically when the trial ends rather than being cut off. Among the direct connector competitors this is unusual; most offer a trial and nothing after it.
What are Porter Metrics's main weaknesses?
Four, in order of how often they end an evaluation. Connector count: 26 sources against 150-plus on Supermetrics and 325-plus on Windsor.ai, which the company itself names as the top reason prospects do not buy, with no Salesforce and no Go High Level connector. Compliance: no SOC 2 Type 2 certification as of August 2026 and the company's own statement that the product is not GDPR compliant. Destinations: no Tableau, Snowflake, Redshift, S3, or FTP. And modelling control: there is no SQL editor at all, so analysts who want exact control over transformations are limited to natural language and visual builders. Reviewers also report slow dashboard loading and support response times that could be faster.
Porter Metrics vs Supermetrics: which should a small business choose?
Check your source list first, because it usually decides the question outright. If every platform you report on is among Porter's 26, Porter is the better buy: $39.99 a month for three accounts includes every destination, unlimited users, automatic blending, alerting, and 60 templates, where Supermetrics Starter at 49 euros gives one destination, one user, and three data sources with additional destinations, users, and ad accounts all charged separately. If a single platform you need is outside Porter's catalogue, or if procurement requires SOC 2, SAML SSO, data residency controls, or a Snowflake destination, Supermetrics is the correct choice and the price comparison stops mattering.
Porter Metrics vs AgencyAnalytics: are they the same kind of tool?
No, and confusing them is the most common mistake buyers make in this category. AgencyAnalytics is a complete client reporting suite at roughly $20 per client per month: white-labelled dashboards on your own domain, client logins, 80-plus connectors, scheduling, and permissions, where the dashboard is the product. Porter is a connector layer with no dashboard, no portal, no client concept, and no white labelling. If you want clients logging into something branded, buy AgencyAnalytics. If your client experience is already built in Looker Studio and you only need the data to arrive correctly and cheaply, buy Porter.
Do I need Looker Studio to use Porter Metrics?
No, though it is the most common pairing and Porter's deepest integration. The same subscription writes to Google Sheets, Power BI, a BigQuery dataset in your own Google Cloud project, Slack, and Zapier, all included with no per-destination fee. Looker Studio is where Porter does something competitors do not: it connects through the Data Studio API and creates the report with data already loaded, which is how its roughly 60 templates install in one click rather than needing manual data source configuration.
Which platforms does Porter Metrics connect to?
Twenty-six as of August 2026. Paid media: Meta Ads, Google Ads, TikTok Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Reddit Ads, Pinterest Ads, Microsoft Ads, Apple Ads, X Ads, and Google DV360. Analytics: GA4. Social: Instagram Insights, Instagram Public Data, TikTok Insights, Facebook Insights, Facebook Public Data, and LinkedIn Pages. Ecommerce: Shopify and Amazon Seller. CRM and email: HubSpot, Klaviyo, Mailchimp, and ActiveCampaign. SEO and local: Google Search Console and Google Business Profile. Plus Google Sheets as a source, which is the documented workaround for anything not on the list.
Does Porter Metrics support BigQuery?
Yes, on every plan including the free one, and the important detail is that it writes into a Google Cloud project you own rather than one the vendor holds, so the data survives cancellation. The free plan is capped at a 30-day window; paid plans have no date-range limit. Porter also uses a managed BigQuery layer internally to store and backfill rate-limited sources such as HubSpot, Shopify, ActiveCampaign, and Amazon Seller, which is invisible to the user and requires no SQL or schema setup. Google's own BigQuery storage and query charges apply to your project and are billed by Google, not Porter.
Is Porter Metrics SOC 2 or GDPR compliant?
Neither, as of August 2026. The company states it has no SOC 2 Type 2 certification and expects one during 2026, and its own published documentation says the product is not GDPR compliant, flagging this specifically for European teams with data residency requirements. What it offers instead is NDAs and the customer-owned BigQuery destination so warehoused data sits in your own infrastructure. If a compliance document is a procurement requirement, this is a hard stop and the company itself points buyers toward alternatives.
Can Porter Metrics connect to a platform it does not support?
Only indirectly. The documented route is Google Sheets: export or automate the data into a sheet, connect the sheet as a Porter source, and use the data mapping feature to combine its columns with native connector fields so the imported data blends with everything else. This also covers offline costs, final revenue figures, and targets that exist nowhere else. Genuine custom connector development is offered, but only to customers on plans from about $1,000 a month.
Can I use Porter Metrics with Claude or ChatGPT?
Yes. Porter runs a hosted MCP server at mcp.portermetrics.com that is added as a custom connector in Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP-compatible client, and it is included at no additional cost on every plan including the free one. Accounts already connected for Looker Studio or Sheets are immediately queryable in chat with no reconnection. Access is read-only by design: it can answer questions about spend, campaigns, and revenue, and it cannot change campaigns or move money.
Who owns Porter Metrics and where is it based?
It is independent, with no institutional venture round and no acquisition. The company is registered in Lewes, Delaware, and the team is based in Manizales, Caldas, Colombia, where founders Juan Jose Bello, Mateo Gomez, and Carlos Alexis Gomez started the project. It gives its founding year as 2020, though Techstars' directory and its LinkedIn profile both list 2018 for an earlier version of the company. Funding is roughly US$400,000 from angel investors and the Techstars Boulder 2021 cohort, and the team is around ten to sixteen people.
Editorial verdict
Porter Metrics is the connector layer, not the dashboard, and every sensible judgement about it follows from that. It does not compete with AgencyAnalytics, DashThis, or Whatagraph; it competes with Supermetrics and Windsor.ai, and inside that fight its case is packaging rather than breadth. One pricing dimension, every destination and every feature on every plan, automatic cross-source blending that removes the join nobody wants to write, managed warehousing for the APIs that break live connectors, a BigQuery dataset you own, and a permanent free tier make it the best value in this category for a business connecting roughly three to twenty-five accounts across mainstream marketing platforms. The disqualifiers are equally clear and the company states most of them itself: 26 connectors with no Salesforce, no Tableau or Snowflake destination, no SOC 2 Type 2 and an admission that the product is not GDPR compliant, no SQL editor, and a per-account model that turns expensive for an agency running dozens of accounts of the same source. Check your source list and your compliance checklist before anything else, because either one can end the evaluation in a minute. If both pass, start on the free plan, connect three accounts, and see whether a blended table that needed a data engineer last month arrives on its own this month.
Written by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Awards, when shown, are judged against the published criteria in our methodology.