DashThis logoPorter Metrics logo

DashThis vs Porter Metrics

An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.

The short answer

Editorial assessment

Porter Metrics compared with DashThis

A useful price-point comparison because they land near each other and do entirely different things. DashThis is a templated client reporting product starting around $44 a month billed yearly for three dashboards and fifteen data sources, with white labelling, scheduled delivery, and commentary built in; the dashboards themselves are its output. Porter at roughly the same monthly figure gives you no dashboard at all, just correct data flowing into whatever you already use, plus a warehouse and alerting DashThis does not attempt. The choice is really about where you want your design control. DashThis is faster to a finished client report and constrains how it looks; Porter assumes you have already decided how your reports look in Looker Studio or Power BI and only want the plumbing fixed.

Choose DashThis if

Small and mid-sized marketing agencies, freelancers, and in-house teams that report the same channel metrics to the same audience every month and want a branded, automated deliverable without hiring anyone technical to build it.

Choose Porter Metrics if

Small marketing teams, ecommerce brands, and agencies that already report in Looker Studio, Google Sheets, or Power BI, whose data lives in the mainstream ad, social, ecommerce, and CRM platforms Porter covers, and who want cross-channel blending and a warehouse without hiring anyone to build one. It is at its strongest for a business connecting somewhere between three and twenty accounts.

Side by side

13 attributes
AttributeDashThisPorter Metrics
CategoryReportingReporting
Starting price$44 per month on the Individual plan billed yearly ($54 billed monthly) for 3 dashboards and 15 sources (14 days trial)$0 on the free forever plan (3 accounts, 30-day lookback); $15 per account per month thereafter, or $12.50 billed annually (free plan available)
Pricing modelFlat monthly subscription metered on two axes since the March 2026 change: the number of dashboards (one dashboard equals one report, typically one per client) and the number of connected data sources, where a source is one authorized account such as a GA4 property or an ad account, counted once no matter how many widgets use it. Users and integrations are unlimited on every plan, and white labeling is included on every plan. Annual billing is cheaper than monthly on every tier.Charged per connected data source account, where an account means one ad account, one analytics property, one business profile, one store, or one CRM portal, with ten Google Business Profile locations counting as a single account. There are no seat charges, no per-destination charges, and no premium connectors: every destination, blending, templates, custom fields, alerts, and the MCP server are included on every plan including the free one. The per-account rate falls as the account count rises. Annual billing gives two months free, roughly 16.6 percent.
Free planNoFree forever: 3 data source accounts, 30-day data lookback, all destinations including BigQuery and the MCP server, automatic data blending, and all features. The lookback window is the only functional restriction.
Free trial14 days with 10 dashboards, no credit card required14 days, unlimited accounts, no credit card required; the account downgrades automatically to the free forever plan afterwards
Best forSmall and mid-sized marketing agencies, freelancers, and in-house teams that report the same channel metrics to the same audience every month and want a branded, automated deliverable without hiring anyone technical to build it.Small marketing teams, ecommerce brands, and agencies that already report in Looker Studio, Google Sheets, or Power BI, whose data lives in the mainstream ad, social, ecommerce, and CRM platforms Porter covers, and who want cross-channel blending and a warehouse without hiring anyone to build one. It is at its strongest for a business connecting somewhere between three and twenty accounts.
Setup timeA first usable dashboard in well under an hour: pick a template, authorize the accounts, adjust widgets. The real work is the first client's report, after which cloning brings each additional client down to minutes. Budget a day to configure branding, custom domain, sending address, and the scheduled dispatch properly for an agency-wide rollout.Under an hour for a first working report. Sign in with the Google account you already use for Looker Studio, authorise a source by OAuth, select the accounts, and install a template through the Data Studio API with data already loaded. A blended multi-source connection with custom fields and a naming-convention parser is more like half a day. A BigQuery destination writing into your own Google Cloud project takes longer only because of Google's side of the setup.
Learning curveDeliberately low, and the product is aimed at account managers rather than analysts. Nothing here requires SQL, data modelling, or a formula language beyond simple arithmetic in calculated widgets. The skills that take longer are editorial: deciding which twelve metrics belong on a client report and writing commentary that says something.Low for a marketer, and deliberately so, because the modelling interfaces are natural language and visual builders rather than SQL. The concepts that take time are what counts as an account for billing, when a source should be switched to stored rather than live, and how the automatic blend has decided to map fields when two platforms disagree about what a campaign is. Analysts used to writing their own joins will find the absence of a SQL editor the hardest adjustment.
PlatformsWeb application (browser-based), Responsive dashboards viewable on mobile, PDF export, Scheduled email deliveryWeb application at app.portermetrics.com, Looker Studio (Data Studio) connector via the Data Studio API, Google Sheets destination, Power BI connector, BigQuery destination into a customer-owned Google Cloud project, Hosted MCP server at mcp.portermetrics.com for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and other MCP clients
ComplianceGDPR-aligned data handling, OAuth-based platform authorization, Google Ads API approved developerNo SOC 2 Type 2 certification as of August 2026; the company states it is expected during 2026, The company's own documentation states the product is not GDPR compliant, and flags this specifically for European teams with data residency requirements, NDAs offered in place of certification, Read-only OAuth access to source platforms, revocable by the customer at any time, Customer-owned BigQuery project offered as the data-control answer, so warehoused data sits in infrastructure the customer holds
Founded20112020
HeadquartersQuebec City, Quebec, CanadaLewes, Delaware, United States, with the team based in Manizales, Caldas, Colombia
OwnershipAcquired by saas.group (September 2023); operates as a brand of Moment Zero incIndependent, angel and accelerator backed

Strengths and limitations

DashThis

Strengths

  • Fastest route in the category from a blank account to a presentable branded client report, because templates and widget presets do the design work.
  • Full white labeling, custom domain, and custom email sender are included on the $44 entry plan rather than reserved for higher tiers.
  • Unlimited users on every plan, so seats never enter the pricing conversation for an agency with a large or growing team.
  • Support quality is the most consistently praised aspect in user reviews, with real humans on chat rather than a deflection bot.

Limitations

  • No public API for pushing data in; anything outside the roughly thirty-plus native connectors arrives as a CSV upload or a Google Sheet you maintain yourself. The authentication API that does exist is a partner-only mechanism for issuing dashboard access tokens, not a data ingestion route.
  • The connector list is narrow next to Supermetrics or Funnel: no meaningful CRM depth beyond HubSpot, little call tracking beyond CallRail, and nothing for offline or point-of-sale revenue.
  • Connector depth varies by platform, and some integrations expose fewer dimensions and breakdowns than the source platform's own reporting, which forces manual supplementation for granular analysis.
  • Data blending is limited to the aggregation and calculated widget features; there is no join across differently shaped datasets and no modelling layer, so genuine cross-channel attribution is out of scope.

Porter Metrics

Strengths

  • One pricing dimension. You pay for connected accounts and nothing else: no per-destination charge, no seat fees, no premium connectors, no feature gating between plans, which is a genuinely simpler bill than Supermetrics or most of the reporting suites.
  • Automatic cross-source blending with no schema work. Dates, campaign names, UTMs, spend, and revenue are unified across connected platforms without a join or a field-mapping exercise, which is the step that normally requires SQL or a data person.
  • Managed warehousing and backfill for the sources that break live connectors, specifically HubSpot, Shopify, ActiveCampaign, Amazon Seller, and large Google Business Profile accounts, with no warehouse to configure.
  • A real permanent free tier: three accounts with every feature and every destination, limited only by a 30-day lookback, plus a 14-day unlimited trial that downgrades to it automatically rather than expiring into a paywall.

Limitations

  • Connector breadth is the defining weakness and the company says so itself, calling 25 integrations against 150-plus on Supermetrics and 325-plus on Windsor the number one reason prospects who evaluate Porter decide not to buy. There is no Salesforce and no Go High Level connector, both on the roadmap and neither shipped.
  • Destination support is narrow. Looker Studio, Google Sheets, Power BI, BigQuery, Slack, and Zapier is the complete list. No Tableau, no Snowflake, no Redshift, no Amazon S3, no FTP.
  • No SOC 2 Type 2 certification as of August 2026, which the company states is expected during the year, and its own documentation says the product is not GDPR compliant. For a European team with data residency obligations or any buyer with a procurement checklist, that is a hard stop, and NDAs plus customer-owned BigQuery are the offered substitutes rather than a fix.
  • No SQL editor and no manual join control. Everything is modelled through natural language, visual builders, and AI, which is fast for a marketer and limiting for an analyst who wants exact control over metric definitions and transformations; verified reviewers describe complex bespoke modelling as requiring workarounds.

Pricing compared

DashThis

Flat monthly subscription metered on two axes since the March 2026 change: the number of dashboards (one dashboard equals one report, typically one per client) and the number of connected data sources, where a source is one authorized account such as a GA4 property or an ad account, counted once no matter how many widgets use it. Users and integrations are unlimited on every plan, and white labeling is included on every plan. Annual billing is cheaper than monthly on every tier.

  • Individual$44 billed yearly, $54 billed monthly
  • Professional$139 billed yearly, $164 billed monthly
  • Business$279 billed yearly, $324 billed monthly
  • StandardFrom $429 billed yearly, from $499 billed monthly

Judged as a replacement for manual reporting labour, the entry tiers are cheap: $44 a month against several hours of account manager time is not a close call. The comparison gets harder against AgencyAnalytics and Swydo, which price nearer to per-client and bundle more agency operations, and against Looker Studio, which is free if someone on the team will build and maintain the connectors. DashThis is priced on capacity rather than on features, and including full white labeling and every integration on the cheapest plan is a genuinely buyer-friendly choice that competitors rarely match. The counterweight is the March 2026 source meter, which can push a 10-dashboard agency onto a 25-dashboard plan for reasons that have nothing to do with client count.

Porter Metrics

Charged per connected data source account, where an account means one ad account, one analytics property, one business profile, one store, or one CRM portal, with ten Google Business Profile locations counting as a single account. There are no seat charges, no per-destination charges, and no premium connectors: every destination, blending, templates, custom fields, alerts, and the MCP server are included on every plan including the free one. The per-account rate falls as the account count rises. Annual billing gives two months free, roughly 16.6 percent.

  • Free forever$0
  • 1 to 2 accounts$15 per account
  • 3 to 12 accounts$39.99 to $96
  • 13 to 20 accounts$100
  • 21 to 199 accounts$105 to about $418
  • 200-plus accounts and BigQuery CustomFrom $400 per month, or from about $1,000 per month for the custom BigQuery arrangement

The honest way to price Porter is per connector against the two products it actually competes with, and the answer changes direction depending on how many accounts you have. For a single business connecting Meta Ads, Google Ads, and GA4 once each, Porter costs $39.99 a month and includes every destination, unlimited users, blending, and templates. Supermetrics' Starter plan at 49 euros a month covers three data sources but gives you one destination, one user, and three accounts per source, so the moment a second person or a second destination is involved Porter is meaningfully cheaper for the same coverage. Windsor.ai's Basic plan at $23 a month monthly ($19 annually) covers three data source types and up to seventy-five accounts, which at three accounts is cheaper than Porter and comes with a far larger connector catalogue. Push the count up and the picture inverts twice. At twenty accounts Porter is a flat $100 a month, against Windsor Standard at $118 ($99 annually) for seven source types and Supermetrics Growth at 199 euros for seven sources, two users, and seven accounts per source: Porter wins clearly. At sixty accounts across five platforms Porter charges $4 per account, about $240 a month, while Windsor Standard covers seventy-five accounts across seven source types for $99 annually, and Porter loses badly. The rule that falls out of this is specific: Porter is the best value in this category between roughly three and twenty-five connected accounts across a handful of platforms, and it is the wrong pricing model for an agency running dozens of accounts of the same source. Add the free forever plan, which no direct competitor of this shape matches in permanence, and the entry risk is close to zero either way.

Editorial verdict on each

DashThis

Ease of Use

DashThis has been doing one job since 2011 and does it with unusual economy: pick a template, connect the accounts, brand it, schedule it, and never build that report by hand again. Including full white labeling, a custom domain, unlimited users, and every integration on a $44 plan is the most buyer-friendly packaging in this category, and the support reputation is earned. The boundaries are equally clear and worth taking seriously: no public ingestion API, a connector list that thins out fast beyond marketing platforms, real blending limits, a cap on widgets per dashboard, and no free plan. The March 2026 source meter is the newest thing to check, because it can put you on a larger plan for connecting ad accounts rather than for adding clients. For a small agency or freelancer whose reporting lives entirely inside the mainstream ad, analytics, and SEO platforms, it is one of the highest-return purchases available. For anyone who needs CRM, offline, or proprietary data joined in, look at a pipeline tool instead and accept that you will build the visualization yourself.

Read the full DashThis profile

Porter Metrics

Porter Metrics is the connector layer, not the dashboard, and every sensible judgement about it follows from that. It does not compete with AgencyAnalytics, DashThis, or Whatagraph; it competes with Supermetrics and Windsor.ai, and inside that fight its case is packaging rather than breadth. One pricing dimension, every destination and every feature on every plan, automatic cross-source blending that removes the join nobody wants to write, managed warehousing for the APIs that break live connectors, a BigQuery dataset you own, and a permanent free tier make it the best value in this category for a business connecting roughly three to twenty-five accounts across mainstream marketing platforms. The disqualifiers are equally clear and the company states most of them itself: 26 connectors with no Salesforce, no Tableau or Snowflake destination, no SOC 2 Type 2 and an admission that the product is not GDPR compliant, no SQL editor, and a per-account model that turns expensive for an agency running dozens of accounts of the same source. Check your source list and your compliance checklist before anything else, because either one can end the evaluation in a minute. If both pass, start on the free plan, connect three accounts, and see whether a blended table that needed a data engineer last month arrives on its own this month.

Read the full Porter Metrics profile

DashThis profile last reviewed 2026-08-23; Porter Metrics last reviewed 2026-08-30. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.