GetProspect vs SalesQL
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Both sides assessedGetProspect compared with SalesQL
SalesQL is the LinkedIn-native choice, covering profiles, Sales Navigator, Recruiter, and RPS, returning both work and personal addresses plus phone numbers, and shipping an MCP server. GetProspect returns work email only but gives you a searchable database independent of LinkedIn, a Google Sheets add-on, a CRM, and a cheaper entry price. Choose SalesQL when LinkedIn is the list and you need phones; choose GetProspect when you want to build lists without it.
SalesQL compared with GetProspect
GetProspect gives every feature to every tier including free and sells a graded ladder of verified work emails from a searchable database, with essentially no phone data. SalesQL sells LinkedIn extraction with phones and personal emails in one pool but gates the API to its third tier. Choose GetProspect when the deliverable is verified work email and you want to build lists independently of LinkedIn; choose SalesQL when LinkedIn is already the list and you need more than a work address.
Choose GetProspect if
Small businesses and solo operators who want a complete email-finding toolkit rather than a feature-gated starter plan, who expect their volume to grow through the middle of a price ladder, and who need work email addresses rather than phone numbers.
Choose SalesQL if
Salespeople and recruiters who prospect inside LinkedIn across profiles, Sales Navigator, and Recruiter, who need personal email addresses and mobile numbers alongside work emails, and who want a single credit pool with an explicit no-match-no-charge rule.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | GetProspect | SalesQL |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Data | Data |
| Starting price | $0 (Free, 50 valid emails), then $34 per month on annual billing (Starter, $49 month-to-month) (free plan available) | $0 (Free, 50 credits), then $39 per month (Basic) (free plan available) |
| Pricing model | Freemium subscription priced by the number of valid verified email addresses per month, with full feature access on every tier and roughly 30 percent off for annual billing. | Freemium subscription priced by monthly credits drawn from a single pool covering emails and phone numbers alike, with included seats, a separate verification allowance, and roughly 25 percent off for annual billing. |
| Free plan | 50 valid email addresses per month with complete access to the database, the LinkedIn extension, the CRM, the bulk finder, the Google Sheets add-on, integrations, and the API. | 50 credits and 100 email verifier credits per month for one user, limited to three folders, with email addresses only and no phone numbers, no CSV enrichment, and no API. |
| Free trial | No time-limited trial; the permanent free tier carries the full feature set | No time-limited trial; the permanent free tier is the evaluation path |
| Best for | Small businesses and solo operators who want a complete email-finding toolkit rather than a feature-gated starter plan, who expect their volume to grow through the middle of a price ladder, and who need work email addresses rather than phone numbers. | Salespeople and recruiters who prospect inside LinkedIn across profiles, Sales Navigator, and Recruiter, who need personal email addresses and mobile numbers alongside work emails, and who want a single credit pool with an explicit no-match-no-charge rule. |
| Setup time | Under ten minutes. Sign up, run a database search or install the extension, and results are immediate. CRM connection adds fifteen minutes of field mapping. | Under ten minutes. Install the Chrome extension, sign in, open a LinkedIn profile. CRM connection adds fifteen minutes; API integration is a day or two depending on scope. |
| Learning curve | Low. Because there is no feature gating, there is also no confusion about what your plan includes: you have everything, and the only variable is how many valid addresses you can pull this month. | Very low, and lower than most competitors because there is only one credit type to understand. The one thing to internalise is that the free tier will not return phone numbers, so a free evaluation does not test the capability most buyers care about. |
| Platforms | Web application, Chrome extension, Google Sheets add-on, REST API | Chrome extension, Web application, REST API, MCP server |
| Compliance | GDPR referenced in the vendor's policies, CCPA referenced in the vendor's policies | GDPR and CCPA referenced in the vendor's policies |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Kyiv, Ukraine | Not publicly disclosed; the Chrome Web Store publisher is registered as SalesQL Ltd |
| Ownership | Privately held and independent | Privately held and independent |
Strengths and limitations
GetProspect
Strengths
- Every feature, including the API, the extension, the CRM, and the integrations, is available on every plan including free, so the free tier is a genuine evaluation rather than a stripped demo.
- Credits are consumed only for valid, verified addresses, making the advertised price close to a true cost per usable contact.
- A properly graded price ladder at 1,000, 5,000, 20,000, and 50,000 valid emails a month, with no cliff for a growing team.
- Both a searchable database and a LinkedIn extension, so losing LinkedIn access does not take the product with it.
Limitations
- No meaningful phone data: five credits a month on two tiers is a rounding error, and no plan makes GetProspect a calling tool.
- No buying signals, intent data, technographics, or org charts, so account research has to happen somewhere else.
- No published API rate limits, which makes building against it a matter of empirical testing rather than reading documentation.
- Sources disagree on whether the API is genuinely available on every tier or gated to the upper plans, and the vendor's own materials are inconsistent enough that it needs confirming per account.
SalesQL
Strengths
- An explicit written rule that a non-match costs nothing, applied to the API as well as the interface, which is the most important disclosure a vendor in this category can make.
- A single credit pool covering work email, personal email, and mobile numbers, which is far simpler and usually cheaper than the multi-meter models used by Kaspr and Tomba.
- Coverage of all four LinkedIn surfaces including Recruiter and Recruiter Professional Services, which most competing extensions do not handle.
- Personal email addresses alongside work ones, which Skrapp, GetProspect, and Hunter do not sell at all and which recruiting workflows depend on.
Limitations
- Entirely dependent on LinkedIn: there is no meaningful standalone database to search, so the product is only as available as your LinkedIn account is.
- The free tier excludes phone numbers, so the capability most buyers want to evaluate is precisely the one the free plan will not let them test.
- No API on Free or Basic, so developer evaluation starts at 79 dollars a month.
- The promised email sequencing feature is announced rather than shipped, and buying on the expectation of it is buying a roadmap.
Pricing compared
GetProspect
Freemium subscription priced by the number of valid verified email addresses per month, with full feature access on every tier and roughly 30 percent off for annual billing.
- Free$0
- Starter$34
- Growth 5K$69
- Growth 20K$199
- Growth 50K$399
At 1,000 verified emails a month, Starter at 34 dollars on annual billing is about 0.034 dollars each, which is more expensive per unit than Skrapp or Icypeas but comes with the whole product rather than a trimmed one. At 5,000, the 69 dollar tier is roughly 0.014 dollars each and is the sweet spot of the ladder. At 10,000 you buy the 20,000-email tier at 199 dollars and pay about 0.02 dollars per address at your real volume, which is competitive with Hunter's Growth plan and considerably better than being forced up to Skrapp's 50,000-credit tier. The valid-only billing rule means all of these figures are close to true costs per usable contact rather than per attempt. Set against that, there are no phone numbers and no enrichment depth, so GetProspect is cheap for exactly one deliverable and useless for the others.
SalesQL
Freemium subscription priced by monthly credits drawn from a single pool covering emails and phone numbers alike, with included seats, a separate verification allowance, and roughly 25 percent off for annual billing.
- Free$0
- Basic$39
- Professional$79
- Organization$119
SalesQL is priced very well for what it does, and the single credit pool is why. At 1,000 lookups a month, Basic's 2,000 credits for 39 dollars is 0.0195 dollars per contact whether that contact is an email or a mobile number, and because misses are free that is a real figure. Compare it to a mobile number bought on Kaspr Business at roughly 0.40 euros or on Tomba at five credits, about 0.0445 dollars, and SalesQL is dramatically cheaper for phone-heavy work. At 10,000 a month, Organization's 12,000 credits for 119 dollars is roughly 0.0099 per contact, which is close to the cheapest credible per-mobile price published anywhere self-serve, and it comes with fifteen seats. The caveat is coverage rather than price: a cheap credit is only cheap if it matches, and SalesQL publishes no match-rate commitment, so a low unit price with poor hit rates on your particular segment is a worse deal than it looks. Test the free tier against your own list, remembering that the free tier withholds the phone numbers you most want to test.
Editorial verdict on each
GetProspect
GetProspect is the most sensibly structured product in this part of the category, and the reason is a decision most vendors will not make: it sells volume rather than features. Everything, including the extension, the CRM, the Sheets add-on, and the integrations, is on the free plan, so evaluation is honest and upgrading is a single simple choice. Add a properly graded ladder from 1,000 to 50,000 valid emails a month and a billing rule that charges only for addresses its verifier will stand behind, and a small business gets something it can actually grow on rather than something it outgrows. The limits are real and worth stating plainly. There are no phone numbers, no intent data, no enrichment depth, no published API rate limits, no SSO, and thin public documentation on sourcing and legal basis. Buy it as a well-priced, well-structured email finder for a team that will send rather than call, and do not expect it to answer any question larger than what this person's work address is.
Read the full GetProspect profileSalesQL
SalesQL is the best-structured LinkedIn extraction tool in this batch, and the reason is two decisions rather than any single feature. One credit buys any data type, so a phone-heavy month costs the same as an email-heavy one, and misses cost nothing, which SalesQL states in writing where five of the biggest names in this category will not. Add coverage of Recruiter and RPS, personal email addresses, fifteen seats on a 119 dollar plan, and an MCP server, and the value per dollar is genuinely hard to beat, particularly for anyone who needs mobile numbers. The reservations are about disclosure rather than product. Almost nothing is published about who runs the company, where the data comes from, or what legal basis supports it, there is no match-rate commitment behind the attractive unit price, and the free tier withholds phones so you cannot test the thing you are buying. Take it if LinkedIn is already your list and you want the cheapest honest credit in the category. Do not take it if a procurement questionnaire is coming, or if you need to build lists when LinkedIn is not available.
Read the full SalesQL profileGetProspect profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; SalesQL last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.