Loom vs Weet
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Editorial assessmentWeet compared with Loom
Loom is a much better recorder with a stronger free tier, a large integration ecosystem, and per-seat pricing, but it treats video as a message rather than as instruction. Weet's chapters, interactivity, and completion analytics make a recording something you can hold people to. Most companies should run Loom for daily communication and consider Weet only if formal training is a real, recurring obligation.
Choose Loom if
Distributed teams that want to replace status meetings, code walkthroughs, design feedback, and support explanations with recordings, especially teams already inside Atlassian tools, plus solo operators and small companies who can live inside the free 25-video allowance.
Choose Weet if
Training, enablement, and operations teams at small and mid-sized companies who need repeatable instructional video with chapters, interactivity, and completion data, especially where the same content has to exist in several languages.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Loom | Weet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video | Video |
| Starting price | $0 (Starter), then $18 per user per month billed monthly (Business) (free plan available) | $24 per creator per month billed yearly ($29 billed monthly) (free plan available) |
| Pricing model | Freemium per-seat subscription with three published tiers and a quote-only Enterprise tier, discounted roughly 17 percent for annual billing. | Per-creator subscription billed monthly or yearly, with a hard-capped free tier and a quoted enterprise plan. |
| Free plan | Starter includes 25 videos per person, a hard five-minute cap per recording, 720p, transcriptions, comments, and emoji reactions, for workspaces of up to 50 members. | Up to 3 weets per workspace, including screen and webcam recording, AI avatars, and automatic transcription and subtitles in more than 100 languages. |
| Free trial | Free Starter plan serves as the evaluation path; paid tiers can be trialed from within the product | The free plan serves as the trial; no card required to start |
| Best for | Distributed teams that want to replace status meetings, code walkthroughs, design feedback, and support explanations with recordings, especially teams already inside Atlassian tools, plus solo operators and small companies who can live inside the free 25-video allowance. | Training, enablement, and operations teams at small and mid-sized companies who need repeatable instructional video with chapters, interactivity, and completion data, especially where the same content has to exist in several languages. |
| Setup time | Under ten minutes. Install the Chrome extension or desktop app, sign in with Google or your work account, grant screen and microphone permissions, and record. There is nothing to configure before the first useful video. | An hour to a first module. Sign up, record or upload, and share. Setting up workspaces and channels properly, and deciding what your chapter and annotation conventions are, is the part worth doing before you produce twenty videos rather than after. |
| Learning curve | Near zero for recording. The part teams get wrong is cultural rather than technical: async video only replaces meetings if people agree to watch recordings instead of asking for a call, and that convention has to be set explicitly. | Low for recording and moderate for the interactive layer. Recording and subtitling are immediate. Designing a module with useful chapters, meaningful annotations, and, on Enterprise, quizzes that check the right thing, is instructional design work rather than software work, and the tool will not do it for you. |
| Platforms | Chrome extension, macOS desktop app, Windows desktop app, iOS, Android, Web | Web application, Browser-based screen and webcam recording, Hosted player with interactive elements |
| Compliance | SOC 2, GDPR, Covered by Atlassian's enterprise security and compliance program | GxP compliance on the Enterprise plan, GDPR as a French company |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | France |
| Ownership | Owned by Atlassian (NASDAQ: TEAM) | Privately held French company, listed in the Bpifrance innovation database |
Strengths and limitations
Loom
Strengths
- The recording experience is still the best in the category: parallel upload means the link is ready instantly, and the extension and desktop app are both genuinely reliable under load.
- Embedding is unmatched, with the player unfurling natively across more than 400 tools including the entire Atlassian suite, Notion, Slack, Figma, and GitHub.
- Transcription and closed captions in more than 50 languages are included on the free tier rather than paywalled.
- Atlassian ownership means real security engineering, SSO and SCIM, custom retention policies, and an uptime SLA, which is more compliance surface than any independent vendor in this category offers.
Limitations
- Zero dynamic personalization: no per-prospect backgrounds, no animated GIF thumbnails generated per contact, no bulk generation from a CSV, and no per-prospect landing pages.
- CRM logging is minimal, and the only first-party CRM connector is Salesforce on the quote-only Enterprise tier, so HubSpot users get nothing native.
- The free tier's five-minute recording cap is much tighter than Vidyard's 30 minutes or Bubbles' unlimited screen recordings, and it stops most real use cases dead.
- Editing is shallow: trim, stitch, text, arrows, and boxes. No multi-track timeline, no zoom and pan, no b-roll.
Weet
Strengths
- Per-creator rather than per-seat pricing, which suits training content perfectly: a handful of people make it and everyone watches it.
- Interactivity is a first-class feature rather than an afterthought, with chapters, in-video links and buttons, and interactive annotations turning a recording into a lesson.
- Transcription, subtitles, and voiceover across more than 100 languages make localization a generation task rather than a production project.
- AI avatars are available even on the free tier, which lets you produce narrated content without anyone being filmed.
Limitations
- The free tier is three videos per workspace, which is a demonstration rather than a plan and gives you no way to pilot the tool at realistic volume.
- Quizzes, learning paths, SSO, and advanced statistics are all Enterprise-only, so the learning-management capabilities that justify the product are gated behind a sales conversation.
- No polish layer: no automatic zoom, no transcript-based editing, no filler word removal, so the output is a competent recording rather than a produced video.
- At $24 per creator the Business plan is expensive relative to Berrycast, Tella, or Zight for anyone not using the interactive features heavily.
Pricing compared
Loom
Freemium per-seat subscription with three published tiers and a quote-only Enterprise tier, discounted roughly 17 percent for annual billing.
- Starter$0
- Business$18
- Business plus AI$24
- EnterpriseCustom
Business at $18 monthly is priced as the category default rather than as a bargain, and after the Atlassian acquisition it stopped being cheap. What you get for it is the most reliable recorder in the category, the best embedding story anywhere, transcription in 50-plus languages, and no usage meter to model. For an internal communication use case that is good value, particularly if you already run Jira and Confluence and can use the bug report flow. For a sales use case it is poor value, because the personalization and CRM machinery that justifies a higher price elsewhere simply is not here, and the one CRM connector Loom does ship is locked behind a quote. Buy it for the team, not for the pipeline.
Weet
Per-creator subscription billed monthly or yearly, with a hard-capped free tier and a quoted enterprise plan.
- Free$0
- Business$24
- EnterpriseCustom
Per-creator pricing is what makes Weet worth considering. At $24 a month for one person to produce unlimited interactive, subtitled, multilingual training that an unlimited audience watches, it is far cheaper than a real LMS and far more capable than a generic recorder. The problem is where the line falls. Quizzes, learning paths, SSO, and advanced statistics are Enterprise-only, which means the features that distinguish Weet from a cheaper recorder are largely the ones you cannot buy without a sales conversation. On the Business plan you are paying $24 for interactive annotations, branding, and multilingual subtitles, which is fair but not remarkable next to Berrycast at around $10 or Tella at $13.
Editorial verdict on each
Loom
Category LeaderLoom is still the best pure recorder in async video, and the reason is unglamorous engineering: it uploads while you talk, so the link is always ready. Add transcription in 50-plus languages on the free tier, embedding across more than 400 tools, and Atlassian's security program behind it, and it remains the safe default for a team that wants to stop holding meetings. Buy it for internal communication, support explanations, and design and code review, ideally on Business plus AI where filler word removal quietly makes every recording watchable. Do not buy it for sales. There is no dynamic personalization, no per-prospect landing page, and the only CRM connector is Salesforce behind an Enterprise quote. The five-minute free cap and post-acquisition price increases also mean Loom is no longer the cheap option it once was, and buyers who care mainly about price should look hard at Bubbles.
Read the full Loom profileWeet
Weet is the right shape for exactly one job: recorded training that people are supposed to complete and act on. Chapters, interactive annotations, in-video links, multilingual subtitles across 100-plus languages, and per-creator rather than per-seat pricing make it materially better than a generic recorder for building a training catalogue, and the GxP-compliant enterprise tier is a level of regulatory seriousness nothing else in this category attempts. The frustrations are structural. The free tier is three videos, which is not a pilot. The features that actually distinguish it, quizzes, learning paths, advanced statistics, and SSO, are all behind an enterprise sales conversation, so the $24 Business plan is competing on interactivity and branding against tools costing half as much. And nothing you build in the interactive layer can be exported. Buy it if formal, multilingual, repeatable training is a real obligation for your business. Buy something cheaper if what you actually need is to record an explanation and send it.
Read the full Weet profileLoom profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; Weet last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.