Claap vs Sybill
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
Still shortlisting? Browse the best in Conversation Intelligence for every option we track, with award winners called out.
The short answer
Both sides assessedClaap compared with Sybill
Sybill Business at $90 goes far deeper on CRM autofill, deal reasoning, and voice-matched writing, and has a genuinely usable free tier. Claap Business at about EUR 48 covers coaching, CRM auto-complete, and deal insights for roughly half that while adding video and workspace collaboration. Pick Sybill when CRM hygiene and deal context justify the price; pick Claap when you want a broader workspace and a smaller bill.
Sybill compared with Claap
Claap, owned by lemlist, bundles recording, AI coaching, CRM auto-complete, and deal insights into a single EUR 48 Business plan with async video on top, which is cheaper than Sybill Business and broader in scope. Sybill goes deeper on deal context, voice-matched writing, and MCP access, and has a much better free tier. Take Claap for a European team wanting one bill; take Sybill for a US team where CRM autofill and deal reasoning are the point.
Choose Claap if
European small sales teams, especially existing lemlist customers, who want call recording, AI coaching, and CRM auto-complete in the same workspace as async internal video, and remote-first companies that value guest and external sharing as much as they value coaching.
Choose Sybill if
Individual account executives and small B2B sales teams drowning in post-call admin, especially those on Salesforce or HubSpot who want CRM fields filled automatically and deal context assembled without maintaining it by hand, and teams that want AI deal context readable from Claude or Slack rather than from another dashboard.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Claap | Sybill |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Call Coaching | Call Coaching |
| Starting price | EUR 0 (Basic), then about EUR 24 per user per month (Pro, billed annually) (free plan available) | $0 (Free), then $30 per user per month (Pro) |
| Pricing model | Per-user subscription across four licence levels with mixed licensing in one workspace, free guest and visitor access, and a monthly AI credit allowance on paid tiers. | Per-user subscription across four tiers with a genuinely usable free plan, plus a weekly credit meter on exploratory AI features while the core post-call workflow is unmetered. |
| Free plan | Basic includes 10 videos per user, 300 minutes total, 3 uploads, calendar sync, 99-language transcripts, basic AI summary, the Chrome extension, the collaborative workspace, and API access. | Free includes unlimited recordings and transcripts, the invisible recorder, Ask Sybill across calls and email, 20 AI meeting summaries a month, AI follow-ups, automated prompts, and 500 credits a week, with data storage limited to a three-month window. |
| Free trial | Free Basic tier available immediately; trials of the paid plans are arranged through the vendor | 14 days of full Business access with no credit card, after which the account converts to a free collaborator licence |
| Best for | European small sales teams, especially existing lemlist customers, who want call recording, AI coaching, and CRM auto-complete in the same workspace as async internal video, and remote-first companies that value guest and external sharing as much as they value coaching. | Individual account executives and small B2B sales teams drowning in post-call admin, especially those on Salesforce or HubSpot who want CRM fields filled automatically and deal context assembled without maintaining it by hand, and teams that want AI deal context readable from Claude or Slack rather than from another dashboard. |
| Setup time | Under an hour to record. Calendar sync and the Chrome extension are the whole setup for capture. CRM auto-complete on Business needs field mapping and a review pass before you trust it, which is a half-day. | Fifteen minutes to start recording. The Business features take longer: mapping the 10 autofill fields to your CRM schema and validating what the AI writes into them is a half-day of work you should not skip. |
| Learning curve | Low for recording and watching, moderate for the workspace model. Teams that have never used channels and guest licences take a week to settle on how the workspace should be organized, and that decision is harder to change later than it looks. | Low. Sybill is designed so reps do nothing beyond reviewing output, and the free tier means adoption can happen bottom-up before anyone signs a contract. The credit model is the only concept that needs explaining. |
| Platforms | Web app, Chrome extension, Desktop screen recorder, Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, Mobile access | Web app, Invisible desktop recorder, Bot for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, Slack, Mobile app, MCP connector |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2 (verify current status with the vendor) | SOC 2, GDPR, ISO 27001 |
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Mountain View, California, United States |
| Ownership | Acquired by lemlist in October 2025 for a reported $25M | Venture-backed |
Strengths and limitations
Claap
Strengths
- Combines conversation intelligence with async video and a collaborative workspace, which no direct competitor in this category does, and the video editing is genuinely good.
- Transcription in 99 languages and API access are available even on the free tier, which is more generous than most vendors' entry plans.
- Guest and visitor access is free and unlimited on Business, so customers, partners, and the wider company can watch recordings without consuming licences.
- Mixed licensing within one workspace means a company can put two managers on Business and everyone else on free Basic rather than uniformly licensing the org.
Limitations
- No weighted scorecard engine with named methodology templates; AI coaching is generated feedback rather than a scoring rubric applied consistently and reported over time.
- The free Basic tier's 300-minute total allowance is a hard ceiling rather than a monthly one, which makes it unusable as a working plan.
- Pro caps recording at 1,000 minutes a month, so a busy AE can exhaust it and be pushed to Business for reasons unrelated to coaching.
- AI credits are a second meter alongside minutes, and the interaction between the two is not obvious until you are using the product heavily.
Sybill
Strengths
- A free tier with unlimited recordings and transcripts, the invisible recorder, and Ask Sybill over calls and email, which is more usable than most competitors' paid entry tiers.
- Both capture modes: an invisible recorder for discreet calls and a visible bot when disclosure and video matter, available without paying for the privilege.
- Follow-up emails and summaries written in the rep's own voice from prior winning deals, which is the difference between a draft that gets sent and one that gets rewritten.
- CRM autofill and the deal workspace attack the actual bottleneck in most small sales teams, which is that the system of record is fiction.
Limitations
- The step from Pro at $30 to Business at $90 is brutal, and the features most buyers actually want (CRM autofill, deal workspace, full CRM context) are all above that line.
- CRM autofill is capped at 10 fields on Business; removing the cap requires an Enterprise quote, which reintroduces the sales cycle the self-serve model was supposed to avoid.
- No weighted scorecard engine with custom rubric criteria, so a manager wanting structured call scoring against MEDDICC will find Avoma or Demodesk better suited.
- The credit meter is a variable cost signal even though the core workflow is exempt; heavy Ask Sybill or API users need to model it rather than assume the allocation is generous.
Pricing compared
Claap
Per-user subscription across four licence levels with mixed licensing in one workspace, free guest and visitor access, and a monthly AI credit allowance on paid tiers.
- BasicEUR 0
- Proabout EUR 24
- Businessabout EUR 48
- EnterpriseCustom
At about EUR 24, Pro is a fair price for unlimited recordings, advanced summaries, meeting and speaker insights, video editing, and 50 guest seats, and it is the tier most small teams will find sufficient. Business at about EUR 48 is where Claap becomes a conversation intelligence product, and at that price it is competing directly with Demodesk's EUR 49 plan, which has stronger scorecard machinery and better compliance credentials, and with Avoma's roughly $53 module stack, which goes deeper on trackers and forecasting. Claap's answer is that neither of those gives you async video, a collaborative workspace, unlimited guest access, or a path into lemlist's outbound engine. If you value those, the price is right. If you only want coaching, you can do better elsewhere for the same money.
Sybill
Per-user subscription across four tiers with a genuinely usable free plan, plus a weekly credit meter on exploratory AI features while the core post-call workflow is unmetered.
- Free$0
- Pro$30
- Business$90
- EnterpriseCustom
Sybill's value is barbell-shaped. The free tier is one of the best in the category and will genuinely serve a solo seller for a long time, and Pro at $30 is a fair price for unlimited summaries in your own voice with unlimited storage. Business at $90 is a different conversation: it is triple Pro, roughly triple Grain's coaching tier, and more than Avoma's fully loaded stack, and what you get for it is CRM autofill on 10 fields, the deal workspace, and full CRM context in Ask Sybill. Whether that is good value depends entirely on how much your reps' CRM admin time is worth and how badly your opportunity records are rotting. For a team of four AEs each losing an hour a day to Salesforce, $90 pays for itself easily. For a team that wanted call coaching, it is a lot of money for the wrong feature set.
Editorial verdict on each
Claap
Claap is the most interesting hybrid in this category and the hardest to compare directly, because half of what you get is not conversation intelligence at all. The async video recorder, the collaborative workspace, the video editing, and the free unlimited guest access on Business make it a genuinely different kind of purchase from Grain or Demodesk, and for a remote-first European team those things may matter more than an extra layer of scorecard rigor. On pure coaching capability it is behind Demodesk at the same price and behind Avoma at a similar one, and the absence of a real scorecard engine is the honest gap. The lemlist acquisition cuts both ways: a profitable, bootstrapped parent with 20,000 customers is about as safe an owner as a small AI company can hope for, and the product's future is now tied to someone else's outbound strategy. If you run lemlist, evaluate Claap first. If you do not, and coaching rigor is what you want, look at Demodesk before you sign.
Read the full Claap profileSybill
MomentumSybill is the best product in this category for the rep rather than the manager, and its free tier is the most generous entry point anyone in conversation intelligence offers: unlimited recordings, invisible capture, and a working assistant for nothing. The trouble is the shape of the paid ladder. Pro at $30 is a nice notetaker upgrade; the product Sybill actually markets, with CRM autofill, the deal workspace, and full CRM reasoning in Ask Sybill, lives at $90 a seat, which is triple Pro and more than a loaded Avoma configuration. That price is defensible if you genuinely believe your reps lose an hour a day to CRM admin, and indefensible if you were hoping for call coaching, which Sybill does not do in a structured way. Start on the free tier, which costs nothing and will tell you within a fortnight whether the writing quality and deal reasoning are worth $90 a head to you.
Read the full Sybill profileClaap profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; Sybill last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.
The best in Conversation Intelligence
16 trackedConversation intelligence platforms record sales calls, transcribe them, and analyze the content for coaching, deal risk, and competitive mentions, turning the call archive into a searchable and scoreable dataset.
Gong's feature list unbundled into modules a ten-person team can buy, from scheduling through coaching.
Most of Gong's job from $19 a seat, built by a nine-person bootstrapped company.
An AI assistant that fills the CRM after every call moved Sybill from notetaker to the fastest-spreading rep-side tool in the category.
Practice the call against an AI buyer before you burn a real prospect: a coaching mechanism nobody else in the category ships.
Connect a calendar, set a capture rule, and the next meeting records itself; reps do nothing and the free tier covers 20 meetings.
Frequently asked questions
6 questionsWhat is the difference between Claap and Sybill?
Sybill Business at $90 goes far deeper on CRM autofill, deal reasoning, and voice-matched writing, and has a genuinely usable free tier. Claap Business at about EUR 48 covers coaching, CRM auto-complete, and deal insights for roughly half that while adding video and workspace collaboration. Pick Sybill when CRM hygiene and deal context justify the price; pick Claap when you want a broader workspace and a smaller bill.
Is Claap or Sybill cheaper?
Claap starts at EUR 0 (Basic), then about EUR 24 per user per month (Pro, billed annually) (free plan available). Sybill starts at $0 (Free), then $30 per user per month (Pro). The billing models differ, so the entry price is rarely the whole cost. Claap pricing model: Per-user subscription across four licence levels with mixed licensing in one workspace, free guest and visitor access, and a monthly AI credit allowance on paid tiers. Sybill pricing model: Per-user subscription across four tiers with a genuinely usable free plan, plus a weekly credit meter on exploratory AI features while the core post-call workflow is unmetered.
Does Claap or Sybill have a free plan?
Claap has a free plan. Basic includes 10 videos per user, 300 minutes total, 3 uploads, calendar sync, 99-language transcripts, basic AI summary, the Chrome extension, the collaborative workspace, and API access. Trial terms: Free Basic tier available immediately; trials of the paid plans are arranged through the vendor. Sybill has a free plan. Free includes unlimited recordings and transcripts, the invisible recorder, Ask Sybill across calls and email, 20 AI meeting summaries a month, AI follow-ups, automated prompts, and 500 credits a week, with data storage limited to a three-month window. Trial terms: 14 days of full Business access with no credit card, after which the account converts to a free collaborator licence.
Who should choose Claap?
European small sales teams, especially existing lemlist customers, who want call recording, AI coaching, and CRM auto-complete in the same workspace as async internal video, and remote-first companies that value guest and external sharing as much as they value coaching.
Who should choose Sybill?
Individual account executives and small B2B sales teams drowning in post-call admin, especially those on Salesforce or HubSpot who want CRM fields filled automatically and deal context assembled without maintaining it by hand, and teams that want AI deal context readable from Claude or Slack rather than from another dashboard.
What are the best alternatives to Claap and Sybill?
SaaSTracker profiles 16 products in Conversation Intelligence. The Summer 2026 awards in the category went to Avoma (Category Leader), Rafiki (Best Value), Yoodli (Innovation). Every profile is compiled from primary sources, so a shortlist can be built from pricing, limitations, and fit rather than from star ratings.
