Datagma vs Lusha
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
Still shortlisting? Browse the best in B2B Data Providers for every option we track, with award winners called out.
The short answer
Editorial assessmentDatagma compared with Lusha
Lusha is a far larger, better resourced vendor with a proper prospecting database, intent data, SOC 2, and enterprise controls, and it charges accordingly on a per-seat basis. Datagma has none of that and costs a fraction. If you need to build lists, pass a security review, or equip a large team, Lusha. If you have the identities already and simply need numbers cheaply across a small team, Datagma does the same job for less.
Choose Datagma if
Small sales teams that need mobile phone numbers at a published price without a sales call or a per-seat contract, and European teams that want a single credit pool covering both email and phone enrichment inside HubSpot or an automation tool.
Choose Lusha if
SDRs and small teams that need reliable phone numbers and emails fast, without committing to an enterprise data contract.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Datagma | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Data | Data |
| Starting price | $0 (Free), then $49 per month (Regular) | Free plan (40 credits/mo); paid from $49.90/mo, or $37.45/mo billed yearly (Starter, 1 user, 400 credits/mo) |
| Pricing model | Freemium monthly or annual subscription drawing on a single credit pool, where one credit buys a verified email and thirty credits buy a verified mobile number, with seats that scale by plan (1, 1, 3, and 5) and extra seats at 5 dollars a user a month. | Freemium with per-plan tiers that each include a set number of seats; one credit pool meters reveals (1 credit per email, 5 per phone number), and Pro and Premium credit allowances expand on a slider. Yearly billing is 25 percent off; Scale is custom. |
| Free plan | 90 verified emails or three mobile numbers per month, with API access and one seat. | 40 credits a month for one user with the extension, enough for a handful of phone reveals or 40 emails. |
| Free trial | No time-limited trial; the permanent free tier is the evaluation path | No |
| Best for | Small sales teams that need mobile phone numbers at a published price without a sales call or a per-seat contract, and European teams that want a single credit pool covering both email and phone enrichment inside HubSpot or an automation tool. | SDRs and small teams that need reliable phone numbers and emails fast, without committing to an enterprise data contract. |
| Setup time | Ten minutes for the web app, the Chrome extension, or a Zapier flow. Around an hour for the native HubSpot integration, mostly spent deciding which fields Datagma may write to. | Ten minutes to first reveal; an afternoon for CRM sync and team credit pooling. |
| Learning curve | Low. The only concept to internalise is the thirty-to-one exchange rate, because a team that starts pulling mobiles without adjusting its mental model will exhaust a monthly allowance in a few days. | The gentlest in the data category. |
| Platforms | Web application, Chrome extension for LinkedIn and Sales Navigator, HubSpot app, Bulk file upload, REST API | Web app, Chrome extension, REST API |
| Compliance | GDPR as a French-established company under CNIL supervision, Published data rights request route, Exclusion list opt-out for individuals, Thirty day deletion of retrieved phone data | ISO 27701, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA |
| Founded | 2021 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Ownership | Privately held and bootstrapped | Venture-backed (private) |
Strengths and limitations
Datagma
Strengths
- The published thirty-credit exchange rate for a mobile number is the clearest phone pricing in this category, and it is buyable without a sales call.
- One shared credit pool for email and phone means you can flex between channels rather than stranding two separate allowances.
- Seats cost 5 dollars a month beyond the ones included, far below the per-seat pricing that dominates the cost of RocketReach and ContactOut.
- Twelve month credit rollover on monthly plans is unusually generous at this price point.
Limitations
- No published match rate for phones or emails, and because lookups are brokered to partner providers at request time, coverage varies by geography and over time in ways the vendor cannot commit to.
- No prospecting database, so it cannot tell you who to contact, only how to reach someone you have already identified.
- No SOC 2, ISO 27001, SSO, or audit logging, so a buyer with a formal security review will not get through it.
- Roughly three staff and modest disclosed revenue means genuine continuity risk for a business that would be disrupted if the service stopped.
Lusha
Strengths
- Best-in-class direct-dial accuracy in its price range, the defining differentiator.
- Frictionless extension workflow; fastest time-to-value in the category.
- Genuinely useful free tier keeps evaluation honest.
- Compliance certifications (ISO 27701, SOC 2) ease privacy reviews unusual at this price.
Limitations
- Database breadth and filter depth trail Apollo's at similar spend.
- Credit economics punish careless bulk reveals; phone credits deplete fast.
- The engagement layer is thin: automated email sequences exist on every plan, but calling, multichannel cadences and deliverability tooling live elsewhere.
- Intent/signal features are add-on-grade, not differentiating.
Pricing compared
Datagma
Freemium monthly or annual subscription drawing on a single credit pool, where one credit buys a verified email and thirty credits buy a verified mobile number, with seats that scale by plan (1, 1, 3, and 5) and extra seats at 5 dollars a user a month.
- Free$0
- Regular$49
- Popular$99
- Expert$249
- EnterpriseCustom
For email alone Datagma is competitive but not exceptional, at roughly 1.6 cents per verified address at 1,000 to 3,000 a month and about 1.1 cents at 22,500. Icypeas is cheaper and Anymail Finder is comparable. The reason to buy is the phone number: at 30 credits a mobile costs about 49 cents on Regular and 33 cents on Expert, published openly and buyable without a call, where FullEnrich and BetterContact charge ten credits that work out similar or higher and where RocketReach and ContactOut wrap phones in per-seat annual plans. Add ten included seats and twelve month rollover on monthly billing and Datagma is the cheapest legitimate way for a small team to get dialable numbers. The risk you are pricing is coverage variance and a three-person vendor.
Lusha
Freemium with per-plan tiers that each include a set number of seats; one credit pool meters reveals (1 credit per email, 5 per phone number), and Pro and Premium credit allowances expand on a slider. Yearly billing is 25 percent off; Scale is custom.
- Free$0
- Starter$49.90
- Pro$69.90
- Premium$399.90
- ScaleCustom
Priced above Apollo per record and below enterprise contracts, Lusha's premium buys dial accuracy where it pays for itself in connect rates. For email-centric volume it's the wrong spend; for phone-led motions it's often the highest-ROI data line after the sequencer.
Editorial verdict on each
Datagma
Datagma exists to solve one problem cheaply: getting a mobile phone number without signing an annual contract or sitting through a demo. Thirty credits per mobile, published openly, works out at 33 to 49 cents a number, with cheap extra seats, twelve month rollover on paid plans, and an API on every tier including the free one. For a small sales team that has decided to start calling, that is the least painful entry point in this market. The offsetting realities are that Datagma is a broker rather than a database, publishes no match rate, and is run by about three people. Use it as a cheap phone source inside a waterfall or as a two-person team's dialling budget. Do not make it the single dependency underneath a revenue-critical outbound machine.
Read the full Datagma profileLusha
Best ValueLusha is the precision instrument of self-serve B2B data: the extension is still the fastest reveal workflow anywhere, and the dials are the ones that actually connect. It has wisely stopped pretending to be a platform, its future is being the trusted, certified accuracy layer inside bigger stacks, a role the Clay era rewards. Buy it for phones and speed; buy breadth elsewhere.
Read the full Lusha profileDatagma profile last reviewed 2026-09-26; Lusha last reviewed 2026-09-27. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.
The best in B2B Data Providers
26 trackedB2B data providers supply the contact and company information (emails, phone numbers, firmographics, and buying signals) that feeds prospecting lists and enrichment workflows.
The largest self-serve contact database in the category, fused with sequencing, data and execution in one product.
Accurate direct dials and a genuinely usable free tier make Lusha the lowest-friction entry point into paid B2B data.
Founded in 2022 and already at 40,000 users, Prospeo shipped AI Search, lookalikes, and an MCP server in 2025 as its database passed 280M leads.
Semantic search over the live web with contact data attached made prospecting a language problem rather than a database subscription.
Signup to verified emails in five minutes with zero configuration, and failed searches cost nothing, so nobody needs training to get value from Anymailfinder.
Frequently asked questions
6 questionsWhat is the difference between Datagma and Lusha?
Lusha is a far larger, better resourced vendor with a proper prospecting database, intent data, SOC 2, and enterprise controls, and it charges accordingly on a per-seat basis. Datagma has none of that and costs a fraction. If you need to build lists, pass a security review, or equip a large team, Lusha. If you have the identities already and simply need numbers cheaply across a small team, Datagma does the same job for less.
Is Datagma or Lusha cheaper?
Datagma starts at $0 (Free), then $49 per month (Regular). Lusha starts at Free plan (40 credits/mo); paid from $49.90/mo, or $37.45/mo billed yearly (Starter, 1 user, 400 credits/mo). The billing models differ, so the entry price is rarely the whole cost. Datagma pricing model: Freemium monthly or annual subscription drawing on a single credit pool, where one credit buys a verified email and thirty credits buy a verified mobile number, with seats that scale by plan (1, 1, 3, and 5) and extra seats at 5 dollars a user a month. Lusha pricing model: Freemium with per-plan tiers that each include a set number of seats; one credit pool meters reveals (1 credit per email, 5 per phone number), and Pro and Premium credit allowances expand on a slider.
Does Datagma or Lusha have a free plan?
Datagma has a free plan. 90 verified emails or three mobile numbers per month, with API access and one seat. Trial terms: No time-limited trial; the permanent free tier is the evaluation path. Lusha has a free plan. 40 credits a month for one user with the extension, enough for a handful of phone reveals or 40 emails.
Who should choose Datagma?
Small sales teams that need mobile phone numbers at a published price without a sales call or a per-seat contract, and European teams that want a single credit pool covering both email and phone enrichment inside HubSpot or an automation tool.
Who should choose Lusha?
SDRs and small teams that need reliable phone numbers and emails fast, without committing to an enterprise data contract.
What are the best alternatives to Datagma and Lusha?
SaaSTracker profiles 26 products in B2B Data Providers. The Summer 2026 awards in the category went to Apollo.io (Category Leader), Prospeo (Momentum), Exa (Innovation). Every profile is compiled from primary sources, so a shortlist can be built from pricing, limitations, and fit rather than from star ratings.
