Is Datagma or Lusha cheaper?

Datagma starts at $0 (Free), then $49 per month (Regular) (free plan available). Lusha starts at Free plan; paid from $36/user/mo (free plan available).

Datagma vs Lusha

An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.

The short answer

Editorial assessment

Datagma compared with Lusha

Lusha is a far larger, better resourced vendor with a proper prospecting database, intent data, SOC 2, and enterprise controls, and it charges accordingly on a per-seat basis. Datagma has none of that and costs a fraction. If you need to build lists, pass a security review, or equip a large team, Lusha. If you have the identities already and simply need numbers cheaply across ten seats, Datagma does the same job for less.

Choose Datagma if

Small sales teams that need mobile phone numbers at a published price without a sales call or a per-seat contract, and European teams that want a single credit pool covering both email and phone enrichment inside HubSpot or an automation tool.

Choose Lusha if

SDRs and small teams that need reliable phone numbers and emails fast, without committing to an enterprise data contract.

Side by side

13 attributes

Attribute	Datagma	Lusha
Category	Data	Data
Starting price	$0 (Free), then $49 per month (Regular) (free plan available)	Free plan; paid from $36/user/mo (free plan available)
Pricing model	Freemium monthly or annual subscription drawing on a single credit pool, where one credit buys a verified email and thirty credits buy a verified mobile number, with ten team seats included on every tier.	Freemium with per-user monthly tiers; credits meter reveals (phone credits distinct from email on some plans). Scale tier adds API, enrichment, and governance on annual terms.
Free plan	90 verified emails or three mobile numbers per month, with API access and ten team seats included.	Monthly credit allowance with the extension, genuinely usable.
Free trial	No time-limited trial; the permanent free tier is the evaluation path	7 days (Pro features)
Best for	Small sales teams that need mobile phone numbers at a published price without a sales call or a per-seat contract, and European teams that want a single credit pool covering both email and phone enrichment inside HubSpot or an automation tool.	SDRs and small teams that need reliable phone numbers and emails fast, without committing to an enterprise data contract.
Setup time	Ten minutes for the web app, the Chrome extension, or a Zapier flow. Around an hour for the native HubSpot integration, mostly spent deciding which fields Datagma may write to.	Ten minutes to first reveal; an afternoon for CRM sync and team credit pooling.
Learning curve	Low. The only concept to internalise is the thirty-to-one exchange rate, because a team that starts pulling mobiles without adjusting its mental model will exhaust a monthly allowance in a few days.	The gentlest in the data category.
Platforms	Web application, Chrome extension for LinkedIn and Sales Navigator, HubSpot app, Bulk file upload, REST API	Web app, Chrome extension, REST API (Scale)
Compliance	GDPR as a French-established company under CNIL supervision, Published data rights request route, Exclusion list opt-out for individuals, Thirty day deletion of retrieved phone data	ISO 27701, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA
Founded	2021	2016
Headquarters	Paris, France	Tel Aviv, Israel
Ownership	Privately held and bootstrapped	Venture-backed (private)

Strengths and limitations

Datagma

Strengths

The published thirty-credit exchange rate for a mobile number is the clearest phone pricing in this category, and it is buyable without a sales call.
One shared credit pool for email and phone means you can flex between channels rather than stranding two separate allowances.
Ten team seats on every plan including Free removes the per-seat multiplier that dominates the cost of RocketReach and ContactOut.
Twelve month credit rollover on monthly plans is unusually generous at this price point.

Limitations

No published match rate for phones or emails, and because lookups are brokered to partner providers at request time, coverage varies by geography and over time in ways the vendor cannot commit to.
The vendor does not state clearly whether a failed lookup consumes a credit, which is the most consequential unanswered question on the pricing page.
Annual billing is cheaper per credit but resets the balance at cycle end, so the discount comes at the cost of the rollover that makes the monthly plan attractive.
No prospecting database, so it cannot tell you who to contact, only how to reach someone you have already identified.

Lusha

Strengths

Best-in-class direct-dial accuracy in its price range, the defining differentiator.
Frictionless extension workflow; fastest time-to-value in the category.
Genuinely useful free tier keeps evaluation honest.
Compliance certifications (ISO 27701, SOC 2) ease privacy reviews unusual at this price.

Limitations

Database breadth and filter depth trail Apollo's at similar spend.
Credit economics punish careless bulk reveals; phone credits deplete fast.
No engagement layer, pure data; execution lives elsewhere.
Intent/signal features are add-on-grade, not differentiating.

Pricing compared

Datagma

Freemium monthly or annual subscription drawing on a single credit pool, where one credit buys a verified email and thirty credits buy a verified mobile number, with ten team seats included on every tier.

Free$0
Regular$49
Popular$99
Expert$249
EnterpriseCustom

For email alone Datagma is competitive but not exceptional, at roughly 1.6 cents per verified address at 1,000 to 3,000 a month and about 1.1 cents at 22,500. Icypeas is cheaper and Anymail Finder is comparable. The reason to buy is the phone number: at 30 credits a mobile costs about 49 cents on Regular and 33 cents on Expert, published openly and buyable without a call, where FullEnrich and BetterContact charge ten credits that work out similar or higher and where RocketReach and ContactOut wrap phones in per-seat annual plans. Add ten included seats and twelve month rollover on monthly billing and Datagma is the cheapest legitimate way for a small team to get dialable numbers. The risk you are pricing is coverage variance and a three-person vendor.

Lusha

Freemium with per-user monthly tiers; credits meter reveals (phone credits distinct from email on some plans). Scale tier adds API, enrichment, and governance on annual terms.

Free$0
Pro$36
Premium$59
ScaleCustom

Priced above Apollo per record and below enterprise contracts, Lusha's premium buys dial accuracy where it pays for itself in connect rates. For email-centric volume it's the wrong spend; for phone-led motions it's often the highest-ROI data line after the sequencer.

Editorial verdict on each

Datagma

Datagma exists to solve one problem cheaply: getting a mobile phone number without signing an annual contract or sitting through a demo. Thirty credits per mobile, published openly, works out at 33 to 49 cents a number, with ten seats included, twelve month rollover on monthly plans, and an API on every tier including the free one. For a small sales team that has decided to start calling, that is the least painful entry point in this market. The offsetting realities are that Datagma is a broker rather than a database, publishes no match rate, does not say clearly whether a failed lookup burns credits, and is run by about three people. Use it as a cheap phone source inside a waterfall or as a two-person team's dialling budget. Do not make it the single dependency underneath a revenue-critical outbound machine.

Read the full Datagma profile

Lusha

Best Value

Lusha is the precision instrument of self-serve B2B data: the extension is still the fastest reveal workflow anywhere, and the dials are the ones that actually connect. It has wisely stopped pretending to be a platform, its future is being the trusted, certified accuracy layer inside bigger stacks, a role the Clay era rewards. Buy it for phones and speed; buy breadth elsewhere.

Read the full Lusha profile

Datagma profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; Lusha last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.