Datagma vs FullEnrich
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Both sides assessedDatagma compared with FullEnrich
FullEnrich waterfalls across twenty-five sources at ten credits per verified mobile and one per work email, with a verified-or-free guarantee, three to twelve month rollover, and an MCP server. Datagma is a single brokered source at a lower headline cost per number with more seats included. FullEnrich is the better product; Datagma is the cheaper line item, and teams running FullEnrich frequently have Datagma inside the waterfall anyway.
FullEnrich compared with Datagma
Datagma is a single brokered source that FullEnrich's waterfall can call, so this is orchestration versus supply. Datagma is cheaper per mobile at thirty of its own credits, includes ten seats, and publishes its full ladder; FullEnrich will find records Datagma alone misses and charges nothing when it fails. Buy Datagma to optimise the phone line item on a small team; buy FullEnrich when coverage across regions is the bottleneck.
Choose Datagma if
Small sales teams that need mobile phone numbers at a published price without a sales call or a per-seat contract, and European teams that want a single credit pool covering both email and phone enrichment inside HubSpot or an automation tool.
Choose FullEnrich if
Teams that need high coverage on both emails and mobile numbers from one vendor and want to consume enrichment programmatically, especially developers and GTM engineers building pipelines or wiring data into an AI assistant through MCP.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Datagma | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Data | Data |
| Starting price | $0 (Free), then $49 per month (Regular) (free plan available) | $0 (Free, 50 starter credits), then $55 per month (Pro, 1,000 credits) (free plan available) |
| Pricing model | Freemium monthly or annual subscription drawing on a single credit pool, where one credit buys a verified email and thirty credits buy a verified mobile number, with ten team seats included on every tier. | Freemium subscription with a published entry plan and quoted volume above it, priced from a single credit pool where different data types consume different credit amounts and unverifiable results cost nothing. |
| Free plan | 90 verified emails or three mobile numbers per month, with API access and ten team seats included. | 50 starter credits with waterfall enrichment and MCP server access, extendable through referral credits. |
| Free trial | No time-limited trial; the permanent free tier is the evaluation path | 50 credits on signup with no credit card required |
| Best for | Small sales teams that need mobile phone numbers at a published price without a sales call or a per-seat contract, and European teams that want a single credit pool covering both email and phone enrichment inside HubSpot or an automation tool. | Teams that need high coverage on both emails and mobile numbers from one vendor and want to consume enrichment programmatically, especially developers and GTM engineers building pipelines or wiring data into an AI assistant through MCP. |
| Setup time | Ten minutes for the web app, the Chrome extension, or a Zapier flow. Around an hour for the native HubSpot integration, mostly spent deciding which fields Datagma may write to. | Ten minutes for a CSV run or a Clay column, under an hour for the API, and a few minutes for the MCP server, which is the fastest path to useful for anyone already working in an AI assistant. |
| Learning curve | Low. The only concept to internalise is the thirty-to-one exchange rate, because a team that starts pulling mobiles without adjusting its mental model will exhaust a monthly allowance in a few days. | Low, provided the team learns the credit table. The ten-to-one mobile rate and the three-to-one personal email rate mean a plan's usable size depends entirely on the mix, and teams that assume every output costs one credit will exhaust an allowance in days. |
| Platforms | Web application, Chrome extension for LinkedIn and Sales Navigator, HubSpot app, Bulk file upload, REST API | Web application, Chrome extension, CSV upload, REST APIs, MCP server, Clay integration |
| Compliance | GDPR as a French-established company under CNIL supervision, Published data rights request route, Exclusion list opt-out for individuals, Thirty day deletion of retrieved phone data | GDPR, CCPA, Data processing agreement available |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | San Francisco, United States (founded in France) |
| Ownership | Privately held and bootstrapped | Venture-backed (seed) |
Strengths and limitations
Datagma
Strengths
- The published thirty-credit exchange rate for a mobile number is the clearest phone pricing in this category, and it is buyable without a sales call.
- One shared credit pool for email and phone means you can flex between channels rather than stranding two separate allowances.
- Ten team seats on every plan including Free removes the per-seat multiplier that dominates the cost of RocketReach and ContactOut.
- Twelve month credit rollover on monthly plans is unusually generous at this price point.
Limitations
- No published match rate for phones or emails, and because lookups are brokered to partner providers at request time, coverage varies by geography and over time in ways the vendor cannot commit to.
- The vendor does not state clearly whether a failed lookup consumes a credit, which is the most consequential unanswered question on the pricing page.
- Annual billing is cheaper per credit but resets the balance at cycle end, so the discount comes at the cost of the rollover that makes the monthly plan attractive.
- No prospecting database, so it cannot tell you who to contact, only how to reach someone you have already identified.
FullEnrich
Strengths
- Twenty-five plus providers in one waterfall, available on every tier including free, which is broader than most competitors and not gated behind an upgrade.
- Verified or it is free is the strongest available billing guarantee, and the granular credit table lets you model a month's spend precisely before committing.
- An MCP server on all tiers, including the free plan, is the most complete answer in this category to how enrichment plugs into an AI assistant.
- Three separate APIs, for enrichment, search, and reverse email lookup, rather than a single endpoint bolted onto a web app.
Limitations
- Only the 1,000 credit step is publicly priced. Anything above it requires a quote, which is a real transparency gap in a category where competitors publish ladders to 100,000 credits.
- At 5.5 cents per verified work email the entry rate is among the most expensive here, several times what a single-source vendor charges.
- Bring-your-own provider keys, the feature that fixes the unit economics at volume, is Enterprise-only, as are custom rate limits and SSO.
- The waterfall abstracts which of twenty-five providers supplied a given record, which will not satisfy a strict data provenance policy.
Pricing compared
Datagma
Freemium monthly or annual subscription drawing on a single credit pool, where one credit buys a verified email and thirty credits buy a verified mobile number, with ten team seats included on every tier.
- Free$0
- Regular$49
- Popular$99
- Expert$249
- EnterpriseCustom
For email alone Datagma is competitive but not exceptional, at roughly 1.6 cents per verified address at 1,000 to 3,000 a month and about 1.1 cents at 22,500. Icypeas is cheaper and Anymail Finder is comparable. The reason to buy is the phone number: at 30 credits a mobile costs about 49 cents on Regular and 33 cents on Expert, published openly and buyable without a call, where FullEnrich and BetterContact charge ten credits that work out similar or higher and where RocketReach and ContactOut wrap phones in per-seat annual plans. Add ten included seats and twelve month rollover on monthly billing and Datagma is the cheapest legitimate way for a small team to get dialable numbers. The risk you are pricing is coverage variance and a three-person vendor.
FullEnrich
Freemium subscription with a published entry plan and quoted volume above it, priced from a single credit pool where different data types consume different credit amounts and unverifiable results cost nothing.
- Free$0
- Pro$55
- EnterpriseCustom
At 1,000 lookups the Pro plan costs 55 dollars, or 5.5 cents per verified work email, which is roughly six times Icypeas and slightly more than BetterContact's entry rate. At 10,000 the price is not published, so the honest answer is that you cannot model it without a quote, and that opacity is the main weakness of an otherwise transparent product. What the premium buys is coverage from twenty-five sources, a floor on waste because unverified results are free, personal emails and reverse lookup as distinct priced outputs, company data at a quarter credit, and an MCP server on every tier. For an international list or an agentic workflow that is a genuinely differentiated package. For a well-covered domestic list, you are paying waterfall prices for a problem you do not have.
Editorial verdict on each
Datagma
Datagma exists to solve one problem cheaply: getting a mobile phone number without signing an annual contract or sitting through a demo. Thirty credits per mobile, published openly, works out at 33 to 49 cents a number, with ten seats included, twelve month rollover on monthly plans, and an API on every tier including the free one. For a small sales team that has decided to start calling, that is the least painful entry point in this market. The offsetting realities are that Datagma is a broker rather than a database, publishes no match rate, does not say clearly whether a failed lookup burns credits, and is run by about three people. Use it as a cheap phone source inside a waterfall or as a two-person team's dialling budget. Do not make it the single dependency underneath a revenue-critical outbound machine.
Read the full Datagma profileFullEnrich
FullEnrich is the most technically ambitious of the small waterfall vendors. Twenty-five sources on every tier including free, a granular published credit table, a verified-or-free billing rule, personal emails and reverse lookup as distinct outputs, company data at a quarter credit, and an MCP server that lets an AI assistant call enrichment directly. With roughly two million dollars of seed funding behind it and Mastercard and DocuSign on the customer list, it is also better capitalised than most of its peers. Buy it if you work international lists, if you consume data programmatically, or if you want enrichment available to an agent rather than to a person. The two things to weigh are the price, at 5.5 cents per verified work email on the only published plan, and the fact that everything above 1,000 credits a month, including bring-your-own keys and SSO, requires a quote you cannot see in advance.
Read the full FullEnrich profileDatagma profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; FullEnrich last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.