Enrich vs FullEnrich
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Both sides assessedEnrich compared with FullEnrich
Both are API-first, but FullEnrich sells a verified waterfall across twenty-five external sources with a verified-or-free guarantee, personal emails, and an MCP server on every tier, at 5.5 cents per work email. Enrich sells its own database at roughly half a cent. FullEnrich is the safer product with the clearer terms; Enrich is an order of magnitude cheaper on paper. Run both against the same thousand records before deciding, because the coverage difference is the entire argument.
FullEnrich compared with Enrich
Both are API-first, but they price very differently. Enrich charges ten credits per email against a 100,000 credit pool for 49 dollars, an order of magnitude cheaper per record on paper, and 500 credits per phone. FullEnrich runs a longer verified waterfall, offers personal emails and an MCP server, and guarantees you pay nothing for unverified data. Price-led API buyers should test Enrich first; teams that need verified coverage and AI-assistant access should pay FullEnrich's premium.
Choose Enrich if
Developers and technical teams that consume enrichment programmatically and want the lowest cost per API call, particularly anyone running high-volume validation or building enrichment into a product rather than into a sales workflow.
Choose FullEnrich if
Teams that need high coverage on both emails and mobile numbers from one vendor and want to consume enrichment programmatically, especially developers and GTM engineers building pipelines or wiring data into an AI assistant through MCP.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Enrich | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Data | Data |
| Starting price | $49 per month (Growth Pack, 100,000 credits) (free plan available) | $0 (Free, 50 starter credits), then $55 per month (Pro, 1,000 credits) (free plan available) |
| Pricing model | Monthly credit packs with per-endpoint credit costs drawn from one pool, no per-seat fees and no contract, plus a pay-as-you-go option for infrequent use. | Freemium subscription with a published entry plan and quoted volume above it, priced from a single credit pool where different data types consume different credit amounts and unverifiable results cost nothing. |
| Free plan | No permanent free plan; the 100 signup credits are one-time. | 50 starter credits with waterfall enrichment and MCP server access, extendable through referral credits. |
| Free trial | 100 free credits with no credit card required | 50 credits on signup with no credit card required |
| Best for | Developers and technical teams that consume enrichment programmatically and want the lowest cost per API call, particularly anyone running high-volume validation or building enrichment into a product rather than into a sales workflow. | Teams that need high coverage on both emails and mobile numbers from one vendor and want to consume enrichment programmatically, especially developers and GTM engineers building pipelines or wiring data into an AI assistant through MCP. |
| Setup time | Under an hour for a developer: sign up, take the 100 free credits, call an endpoint, map the response. There is no workspace to configure because there is barely a workspace. | Ten minutes for a CSV run or a Clay column, under an hour for the API, and a few minutes for the MCP server, which is the fastest path to useful for anyone already working in an AI assistant. |
| Learning curve | Low for engineers, awkward for everyone else. The essential thing to internalise is the credit table, because a phone lookup costs fifty times an email lookup and five hundred times a validation, and a team that does not model its endpoint mix will misjudge a plan by an order of magnitude. | Low, provided the team learns the credit table. The ten-to-one mobile rate and the three-to-one personal email rate mean a plan's usable size depends entirely on the mix, and teams that assume every output costs one credit will exhaust an allowance in days. |
| Platforms | REST API, Web application, Bulk processing, No-code integrations | Web application, Chrome extension, CSV upload, REST APIs, MCP server, Clay integration |
| Compliance | Not certified to SOC 2 or ISO 27001 publicly, GDPR position not clearly documented on public pages | GDPR, CCPA, Data processing agreement available |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Dubai, United Arab Emirates | San Francisco, United States (founded in France) |
| Ownership | Venture-backed (early stage) | Venture-backed (seed) |
Strengths and limitations
Enrich
Strengths
- The cheapest published rates in this batch: roughly half a cent per email lookup and around 15 to 25 cents per phone number, well below single-source and waterfall competitors alike.
- Per-endpoint credit pricing means validation at one credit costs a tenth of a lookup, which makes bulk list hygiene nearly free rather than a second subscription.
- No per-seat fees and no contract, so a twelve-person team pays the same as one person and the monthly price needs no annual commitment to unlock.
- Genuinely API-first, with structured responses across emails, phones, titles, company data, and social profiles rather than an API bolted onto a web app.
Limitations
- Credit expiry and rollover terms are not published, so you cannot tell whether an unused balance carries forward before you buy.
- Whether a failed lookup consumes credits is not stated, and at 500 credits per phone attempt that omission has real financial consequences.
- API rate limits are not prominently documented, which is a problem for anyone planning a high-throughput pipeline.
- The operating entity is registered in Dubai rather than in the EEA, which is a materially weaker starting point for a European data protection review than Dropcontact, Icypeas, or BetterContact.
FullEnrich
Strengths
- Twenty-five plus providers in one waterfall, available on every tier including free, which is broader than most competitors and not gated behind an upgrade.
- Verified or it is free is the strongest available billing guarantee, and the granular credit table lets you model a month's spend precisely before committing.
- An MCP server on all tiers, including the free plan, is the most complete answer in this category to how enrichment plugs into an AI assistant.
- Three separate APIs, for enrichment, search, and reverse email lookup, rather than a single endpoint bolted onto a web app.
Limitations
- Only the 1,000 credit step is publicly priced. Anything above it requires a quote, which is a real transparency gap in a category where competitors publish ladders to 100,000 credits.
- At 5.5 cents per verified work email the entry rate is among the most expensive here, several times what a single-source vendor charges.
- Bring-your-own provider keys, the feature that fixes the unit economics at volume, is Enterprise-only, as are custom rate limits and SSO.
- The waterfall abstracts which of twenty-five providers supplied a given record, which will not satisfy a strict data provenance policy.
Pricing compared
Enrich
Monthly credit packs with per-endpoint credit costs drawn from one pool, no per-seat fees and no contract, plus a pay-as-you-go option for infrequent use.
- Free credits$0
- Growth Pack$49
- Scale Pack$149
- Pro Pack$499
- Pay as you goFrom about $20
On published numbers Enrich is the cheapest option in this batch by a wide margin: about half a cent per email lookup at the Growth Pack, roughly a tenth of what Hunter charges and a twentieth of what a waterfall charges, with phone numbers at around 15 to 25 cents against 33 to 55 cents elsewhere. Validation at one credit makes bulk hygiene almost free. The value is real for an API consumer with no need for a workspace. The reason to be careful is that two of the variables that determine actual cost, whether failed lookups burn credits and whether credits expire, are not published, and a single unanswered 500-credit phone miss policy could move the true cost per number by a large multiple. Test both on the free credits, get the answers in writing, and if they come back the way the pricing implies, this is the best price per record here.
FullEnrich
Freemium subscription with a published entry plan and quoted volume above it, priced from a single credit pool where different data types consume different credit amounts and unverifiable results cost nothing.
- Free$0
- Pro$55
- EnterpriseCustom
At 1,000 lookups the Pro plan costs 55 dollars, or 5.5 cents per verified work email, which is roughly six times Icypeas and slightly more than BetterContact's entry rate. At 10,000 the price is not published, so the honest answer is that you cannot model it without a quote, and that opacity is the main weakness of an otherwise transparent product. What the premium buys is coverage from twenty-five sources, a floor on waste because unverified results are free, personal emails and reverse lookup as distinct priced outputs, company data at a quarter credit, and an MCP server on every tier. For an international list or an agentic workflow that is a genuinely differentiated package. For a well-covered domestic list, you are paying waterfall prices for a problem you do not have.
Editorial verdict on each
Enrich
Enrich is the cheapest way to get contact data by the request, and it is honest about what it is: an API with a website attached. Half a cent per email lookup, one credit for a validation, phones at around 15 to 25 cents, no seat fees, and no contract make it the obvious first test for any developer building enrichment into a pipeline or a product. Two things stop it being an unqualified recommendation. The vendor does not publish whether credits expire or whether a failed lookup is charged, and at 500 credits per phone attempt that second omission could change the real cost by a large multiple. And an operating entity in Dubai with no documented GDPR position is a weak place to start if you are contacting people in Europe. Test it on the free credits, get both answers in writing, and if they come back clean it is the best price per record in this category.
Read the full Enrich profileFullEnrich
FullEnrich is the most technically ambitious of the small waterfall vendors. Twenty-five sources on every tier including free, a granular published credit table, a verified-or-free billing rule, personal emails and reverse lookup as distinct outputs, company data at a quarter credit, and an MCP server that lets an AI assistant call enrichment directly. With roughly two million dollars of seed funding behind it and Mastercard and DocuSign on the customer list, it is also better capitalised than most of its peers. Buy it if you work international lists, if you consume data programmatically, or if you want enrichment available to an agent rather than to a person. The two things to weigh are the price, at 5.5 cents per verified work email on the only published plan, and the fact that everything above 1,000 credits a month, including bring-your-own keys and SSO, requires a quote you cannot see in advance.
Read the full FullEnrich profileEnrich profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; FullEnrich last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.