Datagma vs Enrich
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
Still shortlisting? Browse the best in B2B Data Providers for every option we track, with award winners called out.
The short answer
Both sides assessedDatagma compared with Enrich
Enrich is API-first and dramatically cheaper on paper, at ten credits per email and 500 per phone against a 100,000 credit pool for 49 dollars, which prices a mobile near a quarter. Datagma offers a real interface, a Chrome extension, a HubSpot integration, and job change detection that Enrich does not emphasise. Developers building a pipeline should price Enrich first; teams that want a tool rather than an endpoint should take Datagma.
Enrich compared with Datagma
Datagma is a broker with a real interface, a Chrome extension, native HubSpot sync, job change detection, and ten included seats, at about 33 to 49 cents per mobile. Enrich is an endpoint with an owned database and phones nearer 10 to 25 cents but a thin workflow. Teams that want a tool take Datagma; teams that want an API and will build their own workflow take Enrich.
Choose Datagma if
Small sales teams that need mobile phone numbers at a published price without a sales call or a per-seat contract, and European teams that want a single credit pool covering both email and phone enrichment inside HubSpot or an automation tool.
Choose Enrich if
Developers and technical teams that consume enrichment programmatically and want the lowest cost per API call, particularly anyone running high-volume validation or building enrichment into a product rather than into a sales workflow.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Datagma | Enrich |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Data | Data |
| Starting price | $0 (Free), then $49 per month (Regular) | $49 per month (Growth plan, 100,000 credits) (free plan available) |
| Pricing model | Freemium monthly or annual subscription drawing on a single credit pool, where one credit buys a verified email and thirty credits buy a verified mobile number, with seats that scale by plan (1, 1, 3, and 5) and extra seats at 5 dollars a user a month. | Monthly credit plans with per-endpoint credit costs drawn from one pool, unlimited seats and no contract, top-ups at the plan rate, and annual billing on Scale and Pro at about two months off. |
| Free plan | 90 verified emails or three mobile numbers per month, with API access and one seat. | No permanent free plan; the 100 signup credits are one-time. |
| Free trial | No time-limited trial; the permanent free tier is the evaluation path | 100 free credits with no credit card required |
| Best for | Small sales teams that need mobile phone numbers at a published price without a sales call or a per-seat contract, and European teams that want a single credit pool covering both email and phone enrichment inside HubSpot or an automation tool. | Developers and technical teams that consume enrichment programmatically and want the lowest cost per API call, particularly anyone running high-volume validation or building enrichment into a product rather than into a sales workflow. |
| Setup time | Ten minutes for the web app, the Chrome extension, or a Zapier flow. Around an hour for the native HubSpot integration, mostly spent deciding which fields Datagma may write to. | Under an hour for a developer: sign up, take the 100 free credits, call an endpoint, map the response. The Workbench spreadsheet is there if you want it, but most teams start from the API. |
| Learning curve | Low. The only concept to internalise is the thirty-to-one exchange rate, because a team that starts pulling mobiles without adjusting its mental model will exhaust a monthly allowance in a few days. | Low for engineers, awkward for everyone else. The essential thing to internalise is the credit table, because a phone lookup costs fifty times an email lookup and five hundred times a validation, and a team that does not model its endpoint mix will misjudge a plan by an order of magnitude. |
| Platforms | Web application, Chrome extension for LinkedIn and Sales Navigator, HubSpot app, Bulk file upload, REST API | REST API, Web application, Bulk processing, No-code integrations |
| Compliance | GDPR as a French-established company under CNIL supervision, Published data rights request route, Exclusion list opt-out for individuals, Thirty day deletion of retrieved phone data | SOC 2 (stated on the pricing page), GDPR (stated on the pricing page) |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Dubai, United Arab Emirates |
| Ownership | Privately held and bootstrapped | Venture-backed (early stage) |
Strengths and limitations
Datagma
Strengths
- The published thirty-credit exchange rate for a mobile number is the clearest phone pricing in this category, and it is buyable without a sales call.
- One shared credit pool for email and phone means you can flex between channels rather than stranding two separate allowances.
- Seats cost 5 dollars a month beyond the ones included, far below the per-seat pricing that dominates the cost of RocketReach and ContactOut.
- Twelve month credit rollover on monthly plans is unusually generous at this price point.
Limitations
- No published match rate for phones or emails, and because lookups are brokered to partner providers at request time, coverage varies by geography and over time in ways the vendor cannot commit to.
- No prospecting database, so it cannot tell you who to contact, only how to reach someone you have already identified.
- No SOC 2, ISO 27001, SSO, or audit logging, so a buyer with a formal security review will not get through it.
- Roughly three staff and modest disclosed revenue means genuine continuity risk for a business that would be disrupted if the service stopped.
Enrich
Strengths
- The cheapest published rates in this batch: roughly half a cent per email lookup and around 10 to 25 cents per phone number, well below single-source and waterfall competitors alike.
- Per-endpoint credit pricing means validation at one credit costs a tenth of a lookup, which makes bulk list hygiene nearly free rather than a second subscription.
- No per-seat fees and no contract, so a twelve-person team pays the same as one person and the monthly price needs no annual commitment to unlock.
- Genuinely API-first, with structured responses across emails, phones, titles, company data, and social profiles rather than an API bolted onto a web app.
Limitations
- Unused credits do not roll over, which penalises lumpy usage.
- API rate limits are not prominently documented, which is a problem for anyone planning a high-throughput pipeline.
- The operating entity is registered in Dubai rather than in the EEA, which is a materially weaker starting point for a European data protection review than Dropcontact, Icypeas, or BetterContact.
- The pricing page states SOC 2 and GDPR compliance and offers SSO and a custom security review on Enterprise, but no ISO 27001 or audit report is published on the site.
Pricing compared
Datagma
Freemium monthly or annual subscription drawing on a single credit pool, where one credit buys a verified email and thirty credits buy a verified mobile number, with seats that scale by plan (1, 1, 3, and 5) and extra seats at 5 dollars a user a month.
- Free$0
- Regular$49
- Popular$99
- Expert$249
- EnterpriseCustom
For email alone Datagma is competitive but not exceptional, at roughly 1.6 cents per verified address at 1,000 to 3,000 a month and about 1.1 cents at 22,500. Icypeas is cheaper and Anymail Finder is comparable. The reason to buy is the phone number: at 30 credits a mobile costs about 49 cents on Regular and 33 cents on Expert, published openly and buyable without a call, where FullEnrich and BetterContact charge ten credits that work out similar or higher and where RocketReach and ContactOut wrap phones in per-seat annual plans. Add ten included seats and twelve month rollover on monthly billing and Datagma is the cheapest legitimate way for a small team to get dialable numbers. The risk you are pricing is coverage variance and a three-person vendor.
Enrich
Monthly credit plans with per-endpoint credit costs drawn from one pool, unlimited seats and no contract, top-ups at the plan rate, and annual billing on Scale and Pro at about two months off.
- Free credits$0
- Growth$49
- Scale$149
- Pro$499
On published numbers Enrich is the cheapest option in this batch by a wide margin: about half a cent per email lookup at the Growth plan, roughly a tenth of what Hunter charges and a twentieth of what a waterfall charges, with phone numbers at around 10 to 25 cents against 33 to 55 cents elsewhere. Validation at one credit makes bulk hygiene almost free. The value is real for an API consumer with no need for a workspace. The reason to be careful is that two of the variables that determine actual cost, whether failed lookups burn credits and whether credits expire, are not published, and a single unanswered 500-credit phone miss policy could move the true cost per number by a large multiple. Test both on the free credits, get the answers in writing, and if they come back the way the pricing implies, this is the best price per record here.
Editorial verdict on each
Datagma
Datagma exists to solve one problem cheaply: getting a mobile phone number without signing an annual contract or sitting through a demo. Thirty credits per mobile, published openly, works out at 33 to 49 cents a number, with cheap extra seats, twelve month rollover on paid plans, and an API on every tier including the free one. For a small sales team that has decided to start calling, that is the least painful entry point in this market. The offsetting realities are that Datagma is a broker rather than a database, publishes no match rate, and is run by about three people. Use it as a cheap phone source inside a waterfall or as a two-person team's dialling budget. Do not make it the single dependency underneath a revenue-critical outbound machine.
Read the full Datagma profileEnrich
Enrich is the cheapest way to get contact data by the request, and it is honest about what it is: an API with a website attached. Half a cent per email lookup, one credit for a validation, phones at around 15 to 25 cents, no seat fees, and no contract make it the obvious first test for any developer building enrichment into a pipeline or a product. Two things stop it being an unqualified recommendation. Credits do not roll over, which punishes lumpy usage, though failed lookups are never charged. And an operating entity in Dubai whose GDPR position is stated rather than documented in depth is a weaker starting point for contacting people in Europe than an EU-hosted vendor. For steady, programmatic volume it is the best price per record in this category.
Read the full Enrich profileDatagma profile last reviewed 2026-09-26; Enrich last reviewed 2026-09-26. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.
The best in B2B Data Providers
26 trackedB2B data providers supply the contact and company information (emails, phone numbers, firmographics, and buying signals) that feeds prospecting lists and enrichment workflows.
The largest self-serve contact database in the category, fused with sequencing, data and execution in one product.
Accurate direct dials and a genuinely usable free tier make Lusha the lowest-friction entry point into paid B2B data.
Founded in 2022 and already at 40,000 users, Prospeo shipped AI Search, lookalikes, and an MCP server in 2025 as its database passed 280M leads.
Semantic search over the live web with contact data attached made prospecting a language problem rather than a database subscription.
Signup to verified emails in five minutes with zero configuration, and failed searches cost nothing, so nobody needs training to get value from Anymailfinder.
Frequently asked questions
6 questionsWhat is the difference between Datagma and Enrich?
Enrich is API-first and dramatically cheaper on paper, at ten credits per email and 500 per phone against a 100,000 credit pool for 49 dollars, which prices a mobile near a quarter. Datagma offers a real interface, a Chrome extension, a HubSpot integration, and job change detection that Enrich does not emphasise. Developers building a pipeline should price Enrich first; teams that want a tool rather than an endpoint should take Datagma.
Is Datagma or Enrich cheaper?
Datagma starts at $0 (Free), then $49 per month (Regular). Enrich starts at $49 per month (Growth plan, 100,000 credits) (free plan available). The billing models differ, so the entry price is rarely the whole cost. Datagma pricing model: Freemium monthly or annual subscription drawing on a single credit pool, where one credit buys a verified email and thirty credits buy a verified mobile number, with seats that scale by plan (1, 1, 3, and 5) and extra seats at 5 dollars a user a month. Enrich pricing model: Monthly credit plans with per-endpoint credit costs drawn from one pool, unlimited seats and no contract, top-ups at the plan rate, and annual billing on Scale and Pro at about two months off.
Does Datagma or Enrich have a free plan?
Datagma has a free plan. 90 verified emails or three mobile numbers per month, with API access and one seat. Trial terms: No time-limited trial; the permanent free tier is the evaluation path. Enrich has a free plan. No permanent free plan; the 100 signup credits are one-time. Trial terms: 100 free credits with no credit card required.
Who should choose Datagma?
Small sales teams that need mobile phone numbers at a published price without a sales call or a per-seat contract, and European teams that want a single credit pool covering both email and phone enrichment inside HubSpot or an automation tool.
Who should choose Enrich?
Developers and technical teams that consume enrichment programmatically and want the lowest cost per API call, particularly anyone running high-volume validation or building enrichment into a product rather than into a sales workflow.
What are the best alternatives to Datagma and Enrich?
SaaSTracker profiles 26 products in B2B Data Providers. The Summer 2026 awards in the category went to Apollo.io (Category Leader), Lusha (Best Value), Prospeo (Momentum). Every profile is compiled from primary sources, so a shortlist can be built from pricing, limitations, and fit rather than from star ratings.
