Datagma vs Enrich
An independent, review-free comparison compiled by the SaaSTracker editorial team. Both products are profiled in full, and neither can pay for placement here.
The short answer
Both sides assessedDatagma compared with Enrich
Enrich is API-first and dramatically cheaper on paper, at ten credits per email and 500 per phone against a 100,000 credit pool for 49 dollars, which prices a mobile near a quarter. Datagma offers a real interface, a Chrome extension, a HubSpot integration, and job change detection that Enrich does not emphasise. Developers building a pipeline should price Enrich first; teams that want a tool rather than an endpoint should take Datagma.
Enrich compared with Datagma
Datagma is a broker with a real interface, a Chrome extension, native HubSpot sync, job change detection, and ten included seats, at about 33 to 49 cents per mobile. Enrich is an endpoint with an owned database and phones nearer 15 to 25 cents but no meaningful workflow. Teams that want a tool take Datagma; teams that want an API and will build their own workflow take Enrich.
Choose Datagma if
Small sales teams that need mobile phone numbers at a published price without a sales call or a per-seat contract, and European teams that want a single credit pool covering both email and phone enrichment inside HubSpot or an automation tool.
Choose Enrich if
Developers and technical teams that consume enrichment programmatically and want the lowest cost per API call, particularly anyone running high-volume validation or building enrichment into a product rather than into a sales workflow.
Side by side
13 attributes| Attribute | Datagma | Enrich |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Data | Data |
| Starting price | $0 (Free), then $49 per month (Regular) (free plan available) | $49 per month (Growth Pack, 100,000 credits) (free plan available) |
| Pricing model | Freemium monthly or annual subscription drawing on a single credit pool, where one credit buys a verified email and thirty credits buy a verified mobile number, with ten team seats included on every tier. | Monthly credit packs with per-endpoint credit costs drawn from one pool, no per-seat fees and no contract, plus a pay-as-you-go option for infrequent use. |
| Free plan | 90 verified emails or three mobile numbers per month, with API access and ten team seats included. | No permanent free plan; the 100 signup credits are one-time. |
| Free trial | No time-limited trial; the permanent free tier is the evaluation path | 100 free credits with no credit card required |
| Best for | Small sales teams that need mobile phone numbers at a published price without a sales call or a per-seat contract, and European teams that want a single credit pool covering both email and phone enrichment inside HubSpot or an automation tool. | Developers and technical teams that consume enrichment programmatically and want the lowest cost per API call, particularly anyone running high-volume validation or building enrichment into a product rather than into a sales workflow. |
| Setup time | Ten minutes for the web app, the Chrome extension, or a Zapier flow. Around an hour for the native HubSpot integration, mostly spent deciding which fields Datagma may write to. | Under an hour for a developer: sign up, take the 100 free credits, call an endpoint, map the response. There is no workspace to configure because there is barely a workspace. |
| Learning curve | Low. The only concept to internalise is the thirty-to-one exchange rate, because a team that starts pulling mobiles without adjusting its mental model will exhaust a monthly allowance in a few days. | Low for engineers, awkward for everyone else. The essential thing to internalise is the credit table, because a phone lookup costs fifty times an email lookup and five hundred times a validation, and a team that does not model its endpoint mix will misjudge a plan by an order of magnitude. |
| Platforms | Web application, Chrome extension for LinkedIn and Sales Navigator, HubSpot app, Bulk file upload, REST API | REST API, Web application, Bulk processing, No-code integrations |
| Compliance | GDPR as a French-established company under CNIL supervision, Published data rights request route, Exclusion list opt-out for individuals, Thirty day deletion of retrieved phone data | Not certified to SOC 2 or ISO 27001 publicly, GDPR position not clearly documented on public pages |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Dubai, United Arab Emirates |
| Ownership | Privately held and bootstrapped | Venture-backed (early stage) |
Strengths and limitations
Datagma
Strengths
- The published thirty-credit exchange rate for a mobile number is the clearest phone pricing in this category, and it is buyable without a sales call.
- One shared credit pool for email and phone means you can flex between channels rather than stranding two separate allowances.
- Ten team seats on every plan including Free removes the per-seat multiplier that dominates the cost of RocketReach and ContactOut.
- Twelve month credit rollover on monthly plans is unusually generous at this price point.
Limitations
- No published match rate for phones or emails, and because lookups are brokered to partner providers at request time, coverage varies by geography and over time in ways the vendor cannot commit to.
- The vendor does not state clearly whether a failed lookup consumes a credit, which is the most consequential unanswered question on the pricing page.
- Annual billing is cheaper per credit but resets the balance at cycle end, so the discount comes at the cost of the rollover that makes the monthly plan attractive.
- No prospecting database, so it cannot tell you who to contact, only how to reach someone you have already identified.
Enrich
Strengths
- The cheapest published rates in this batch: roughly half a cent per email lookup and around 15 to 25 cents per phone number, well below single-source and waterfall competitors alike.
- Per-endpoint credit pricing means validation at one credit costs a tenth of a lookup, which makes bulk list hygiene nearly free rather than a second subscription.
- No per-seat fees and no contract, so a twelve-person team pays the same as one person and the monthly price needs no annual commitment to unlock.
- Genuinely API-first, with structured responses across emails, phones, titles, company data, and social profiles rather than an API bolted onto a web app.
Limitations
- Credit expiry and rollover terms are not published, so you cannot tell whether an unused balance carries forward before you buy.
- Whether a failed lookup consumes credits is not stated, and at 500 credits per phone attempt that omission has real financial consequences.
- API rate limits are not prominently documented, which is a problem for anyone planning a high-throughput pipeline.
- The operating entity is registered in Dubai rather than in the EEA, which is a materially weaker starting point for a European data protection review than Dropcontact, Icypeas, or BetterContact.
Pricing compared
Datagma
Freemium monthly or annual subscription drawing on a single credit pool, where one credit buys a verified email and thirty credits buy a verified mobile number, with ten team seats included on every tier.
- Free$0
- Regular$49
- Popular$99
- Expert$249
- EnterpriseCustom
For email alone Datagma is competitive but not exceptional, at roughly 1.6 cents per verified address at 1,000 to 3,000 a month and about 1.1 cents at 22,500. Icypeas is cheaper and Anymail Finder is comparable. The reason to buy is the phone number: at 30 credits a mobile costs about 49 cents on Regular and 33 cents on Expert, published openly and buyable without a call, where FullEnrich and BetterContact charge ten credits that work out similar or higher and where RocketReach and ContactOut wrap phones in per-seat annual plans. Add ten included seats and twelve month rollover on monthly billing and Datagma is the cheapest legitimate way for a small team to get dialable numbers. The risk you are pricing is coverage variance and a three-person vendor.
Enrich
Monthly credit packs with per-endpoint credit costs drawn from one pool, no per-seat fees and no contract, plus a pay-as-you-go option for infrequent use.
- Free credits$0
- Growth Pack$49
- Scale Pack$149
- Pro Pack$499
- Pay as you goFrom about $20
On published numbers Enrich is the cheapest option in this batch by a wide margin: about half a cent per email lookup at the Growth Pack, roughly a tenth of what Hunter charges and a twentieth of what a waterfall charges, with phone numbers at around 15 to 25 cents against 33 to 55 cents elsewhere. Validation at one credit makes bulk hygiene almost free. The value is real for an API consumer with no need for a workspace. The reason to be careful is that two of the variables that determine actual cost, whether failed lookups burn credits and whether credits expire, are not published, and a single unanswered 500-credit phone miss policy could move the true cost per number by a large multiple. Test both on the free credits, get the answers in writing, and if they come back the way the pricing implies, this is the best price per record here.
Editorial verdict on each
Datagma
Datagma exists to solve one problem cheaply: getting a mobile phone number without signing an annual contract or sitting through a demo. Thirty credits per mobile, published openly, works out at 33 to 49 cents a number, with ten seats included, twelve month rollover on monthly plans, and an API on every tier including the free one. For a small sales team that has decided to start calling, that is the least painful entry point in this market. The offsetting realities are that Datagma is a broker rather than a database, publishes no match rate, does not say clearly whether a failed lookup burns credits, and is run by about three people. Use it as a cheap phone source inside a waterfall or as a two-person team's dialling budget. Do not make it the single dependency underneath a revenue-critical outbound machine.
Read the full Datagma profileEnrich
Enrich is the cheapest way to get contact data by the request, and it is honest about what it is: an API with a website attached. Half a cent per email lookup, one credit for a validation, phones at around 15 to 25 cents, no seat fees, and no contract make it the obvious first test for any developer building enrichment into a pipeline or a product. Two things stop it being an unqualified recommendation. The vendor does not publish whether credits expire or whether a failed lookup is charged, and at 500 credits per phone attempt that second omission could change the real cost by a large multiple. And an operating entity in Dubai with no documented GDPR position is a weak place to start if you are contacting people in Europe. Test it on the free credits, get both answers in writing, and if they come back clean it is the best price per record in this category.
Read the full Enrich profileDatagma profile last reviewed 2026-08-22; Enrich last reviewed 2026-08-22. Pricing is compiled from public sources and can change without notice. See our methodology.